Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T08:43:59.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Few Words in Answer to Dr. Edgar Sheppard

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

Extract

I am very loth again to take up the time of the readers of this Journal on the subject of the “treatment of a certain class of destructive patients,” but Dr. Sheppard, in the last number,* has in many places so misunderstood my meaning, and consequently so misrepresented my facts, that I cannot allow his paper to pass without endeavouring briefly to rectify some of the more glaring discrepancies.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1868 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* “Some further Observations in reply to Certain Strictures upon the Treatment of a certain class of Destructive Patients.” By Edgar Sheppard, M.D., Medical Superintendent of the Male Department of Colney Hatch.Google Scholar

* Since the above translation went to press, the following annotation appeared in the ‘British Medical Journal;’ a paper which is always in advance in information concerning insanity.Google Scholar

“the treatment of lunatics at colney hatch asylum.Google Scholar

“The following statement occurs in the first number of Professor Griesinger's new and excellent journal, ‘Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten.’ It is signed ‘W.’Google Scholar

“‘When I visited Colney Hatch early in July last, I was conducted through the asylum by Dr. Sheppard's assistant, he himself being unfortunately prevented from accompanying me. Notwithstanding the instructions of the committee, I saw several patients, some of whom (maniacal) were shut up in cells perfectly naked, while others (quiet paralytics) lay in bed without shirts. The gentleman who accompanied me neither blamed the attendant nor gave any directions for clothing the patients: the practice seemed to be the usual one. He readily entered into my arguments against it, but evidently shared Dr. Sheppard's views; and I did not succeed in convincing him by the discussion of the impropriety of such a procedure…. The adversaries of non-restraint will not fail to claim the case of Dr. Sheppard in the interest of restraint. ‘See,’ it will be said, ‘what your boasted non-restraint leads to! Instead of properly restraining the patient, you prefer letting him rave naked in his cell!’Google Scholar

“The writer goes on to point out that his experience at Colney Hatch was quite exceptional, and attributes what he saw there to the impossibility of properly managing so vast an asylum with its present staff of medical officers. Nevertheless, he heads his paper, ‘The Fruits of Non-restraint.’”—British Medical Journal, November 30.Google Scholar

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.