Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T07:19:14.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Impermeable Boundaries on the Propagation of Rayleigh Waves in an Unsaturated Poroelastic Half-Space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2011

Y.-S. Chen ,
W.-C. Lo ,
J.-M. Leu  and
Alexander H.-D. Cheng
Y.-S. Chen*
Affiliation:
Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan 70101, R.O.C. Southern Region Water Resources Office, WRA, MOEA, Tainan County, Taiwan 71544, R.O.C.
W.-C. Lo*
Affiliation:
Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan 70101, R.O.C.
J.-M. Leu*
Affiliation:
Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan 70101, R.O.C.
Alexander H.-D. Cheng*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, U.S.A.
*
* Graduate student and Junior Engineer
** Associate Professor
** Associate Professor
*** Professor
Get access

Abstract

This study presents an analytical model for describing propagation of Rayleigh waves along the impermeable surface of an unsaturated poroelastic half-space. This model is based on the existence of the three modes of dilatational waves which employ the poroelastic equations developed for a porous medium containing two immiscible viscous compressible fluids (Lo, Sposito and Majer, [13]). In a two-fluid saturated medium, the three Rayleigh waves induced by the three dilatational waves can be expressed as R1, R2, and R3 waves in descending order of phase speed magnitude. As the excitation frequency and water saturation are given, the dispersion equation of a cubic polynomial can be solved numerically to obtain the phase speeds and attenuation coefficients of the R1, R2, and R3 waves. The numerical results show the phase speed of the R1 wave is frequency independent (non-dispersive). Comparatively, the R1 wave speed is 93 ∼ 95% of the shear wave speed, and 28% to 49% of the first dilatational wave speed for selected frequencies between 50Hz & 200Hz and relative water saturation ranging from 0.01 to 0.99. However, the R2 and R3 waves are dispersive at the frequencies examined. The ratios of R2 and R3 wave phase speeds to the second and third dilatational wave speeds fall between 56% and 90%. The R1 wave attenuates the least while the R3 wave has the highest attenuation coefficient. Furthermore, the phase speed of the R1 wave under an impermeable surface approaches 1.01 ∼ 1.37 times of the R1 wave under a permeable boundary. Impermeability has significant influence on the phase speeds and attenuation coefficients of the R1 and R2 waves at high water saturation due to the existence of confined fluids.

Keywords

Rayleigh waveImpermeabilityUnsaturationPoroelasticity
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 501 - 511
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Rayleigh, L., ‘On Waves Propagating along the Plane Surface of an Elastic Solid,’ Proceedings London Mathematical Society, 17, pp. 4–11 (1885).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Biot, M. A., ‘Theory of Propagation of Elastic Waves in a Fluid-Saturated Porous Solid: I. Low-Frequency Range, II Higher Frequency Range,’ Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 28, pp. 168–191 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Deresiewicz, H., ‘The Effect of Boundaries on Wave Propagation in a Liquid Filled Porous Media: I. Reflection of Plane Waves at a Free Plane Boundary (Non-dissipative Case),’ Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 50, pp. 599–607 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Jones, J. P., ‘Rayleigh Wave in a Porous Elastic Saturated Solid,’ Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33, pp. 959–962 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Deresiewicz, H., ‘The Effect of Boundaries on Wave Propagation in a Liquid-filled Porous Solid: IV. Surface Waves in a Half-space,’ Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 52, pp. 627–638 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Tajuddin, M., ‘Rayleigh Waves in a Poroelastic Half-space,’ Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75, pp. 682–684 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Yang, J., ‘A Note on Rayleigh Wave Velocity in Saturated Soils with Compressible Constitutes,’ Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 38, pp. 1360–1365 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. de Boer, R. and Liu, Z., ‘Plane Waves in a Semi-infinite Fluid Saturated Porous Medium,’ Transport in Porous Media, 16, pp. 147–173 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Liu, Z. and de Boer, R., ‘Dispersion and Attenuation of Surface Waves in a Fluid-Saturated Porous Medium,’ Transport in Porous Media, 29, pp. 207–223 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Dai, Z. J., Kuang, Z. B. and Zhao, S. X., ‘Rayleigh Waves in a Double Porosity Half-space,’ Journal of Sound and Vibration, 298, pp. 319–332 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Yang, J., ‘Rayleigh Surface Waves in an Idealised Partially Saturated Soil,’ Geotechnique, 55, pp. 409–414 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Lo, W. C., ‘Propagation and Attenuation of Rayleigh Waves in a Semi-infinite Unsaturated Poroelastic Medium,’ Advances in Water Resources, 31, pp. 1399–1410 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Lo, W. C., Sposito, G. and Majer, E., ‘Wave Propagation through Elastic Porous Media Containing Two Immiscible Fluids,’ Water Resources Research, 41, p. W02025 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Deresiewicz, H. and Skalak, R., ‘On Uniqueness in Dynamic Poroelasticity,’ Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 53, pp. 783–789 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Tuncay, K. and Corapcioglu, M. Y., ‘Wave Propagation in Poroelastic Media Saturated by Two Fluids,’ Journal of Applied Mechanics, 64, pp. 313–320 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Yang, J. and Sato, T., ‘Influence of Viscous Coupling on Seismic Reflection and Transmission in Saturated Porous Media,’ Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 88, pp. 1289–1299 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Richart, F. E., Hall, J. R. and Woods, R. D., Vibration of Soils and Foundations, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1970).Google Scholar
18. van Genuchten, M. T., ‘A Closed-Form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils,’ Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44, pp. 892–898 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Mualem, Y., ‘A New Model for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Porous Media,’ Water Resources Research, 12, pp. 513–522 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar