Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T22:47:50.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three-dimensional study of twin boundaries in conventional and grain boundary-engineered 316L stainless steels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2018

Tingguang Liu ,
Shuang Xia ,
Bangxin Zhou ,
Qin Bai  and
Gregory S. Rohrer
Tingguang Liu
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China; and National Center for Materials Service Safety, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
Shuang Xia*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Advanced Special Steel, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China; and Shanghai Xinmin (Dongtai) Duty Forging Co., Ltd., Dongtai 224200, China
Bangxin Zhou
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China
Qin Bai
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China
Gregory S. Rohrer
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: xs@shu.edu.cn, xiashuang14@sohu.com
Get access

Abstract

The three-dimensional microstructures of two conventional 316L stainless steels and a grain boundary (GB)-engineered version of the same steel have been characterized by using serial sectioning and electron backscatter diffraction mapping. The morphologies, area fractions, and number fractions of twin boundaries (TBs) were measured and compared, and the random boundary connectivity was evaluated. Although two-dimensional observations suggest that TBs are planar, occluded twin-grains and tunnel-shaped TBs were also observed. In addition, some large and morphologically complex TBs were observed in the GB-engineered sample, and these TBs were responsible for the increase in the twin area fraction that has been reported in past studies. While GB engineering increased the boundary area fraction, the TB number fraction was almost unchanged. Because the GB engineering process changed only the area fraction and not the number fraction, the connectivity of random boundaries was not disrupted.

Keywords

grain boundariessteelscanning electron microscopy
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 33 , Issue 12 , 28 June 2018 , pp. 1742 - 1754
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carpenter, H.C.H. and Tamura, S.: The formation of twinned metallic crystals. Proc. R. Soc. London 113, 161 (1926).Google Scholar
Mahajan, S., Pande, C.S., Imam, M.A., and Rath, B.B.: Formation of annealing twins in f.c.c. crystals. Acta Mater. 45, 2633 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H., Xia, S., Zhou, B., Chen, W., and Hu, C.: The dependence of carbide morphology on grain boundary character in the highly twinned alloy 690. J. Nucl. Mater. 399, 108 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, P., Palumbo, G., Erb, U., and Aust, K.T.: Influence of grain boundary character distribution on sensitization and intergranular corrosion of alloy 600. Scr. Metall. Mater. 33, 1387 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michiuchi, M., Kokawa, H., Wang, Z.J., Sato, Y.S., and Sakai, K.: Twin-induced grain boundary engineering for 316 austenitic stainless steel. Acta Mater. 54, 5179 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, L., Allen, T.R., and Busby, J.T.: Grain boundary engineering for structure materials of nuclear reactors. J. Nucl. Mater. 441, 661 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, C.L., Xi, S., Li, H., Liu, T.G., Zhou, B.X., Chen, W.J., and Wang, N.: Improving the intergranular corrosion resistance of 304 stainless steel by grain boundary network control. Corros. Sci. 53, 1880 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xia, S., Li, H., Liu, T.G., and Zhou, B.X.: Appling grain boundary engineering to alloy 690 tube for enhancing intergranular corrosion resistance. J. Nucl. Mater. 416, 303 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, E.A. and Was, G.S.: IGSCC of grain boundary engineered 316L and 690 in supercritical water. J. Nucl. Mater. 392, 264 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertsman, V.Y. and Bruemmer, S.M.: Study of grain boundary character along intergranular stress corrosion crack paths in austenitic alloys. Acta Mater. 49, 1589 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelberg, D.L., Marrow, T.J., Newman, R.C., and Babouta, L.: Grain boundary engineering for crack bridging: A new model for intergranular stress corrosion crack (IGSCC) propagation. In Environment-Induced Cracking of Materials, Shipilov, S.A., Jones, R.H., Olive, J.-M., and Rebak, R.B., eds. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2008); pp. 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, T.: Approch to grain boundary design for strong and ductile polycrystals. Res Mech. 11, 47 (1984).Google Scholar
Liu, T.G., Xia, S., Li, H., Zhou, B.X., Bai, Q., Su, C., and Cai, Z.G.: Effect of initial grain sizes on the grain boundary network during grain boundary engineering in alloy 690. J. Mater. Res. 28, 1165 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, T.G., Xia, S., Li, H., Zhou, B.X., and Bai, Q.: Effect of the pre-existing carbides on the grain boundary network during grain boundary engineering in a nickel based alloy. Mater. Charact. 91, 89 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randle, V. and Coleman, M.: A study of low-strain and medium-strain grain boundary engineering. Acta Mater. 57, 3410–3421 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randle, V.: Mechanism of twinning-induced grain boundary engineering in low stacking-fault energy materials. Acta Mater. 47, 4187 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, S., Kobayashi, R., and Watanabe, T.: Control of grain boundary connectivity based on fractal analysis for improvement of intergranular corrosion resistance in SUS316L austenitic stainless steel. Acta Mater. 102, 397 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X., Dallemagne, A., Hou, Y., and Yang, S.: Effect of thermomechanical processing on grain boundary character distribution of Hastelloy X alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 669, 95 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xia, S., Zhou, B.X., and Chen, W.J.: Grain cluster microstructure and grain boundary character distribution in alloy 690. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 40, 3016 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, W., Xia, S., Bai, Q., Zhang, W., Zhou, B., Li, Z., and Jiang, L.: Effects of initial microstructure on the grain boundary network during grain boundary engineering in Hastelloy N alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 704, 724 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelberg, D.L., Newman, R.C., and Marrow, T.J.: Effect of thermomechanical process history on grain boundary control in an austenitic stainless steel. Scripta Mater. 59, 554 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katnagallu, S.S., Mandal, S., Nagaraja, A.C., De Boer, B., and Vadlamani, S.S.: Role of carbide precipitates and process parameters on achieving grain boundary engineered microstructure in a Ni-based superalloy. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 46, 4740 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertsman, V.Y. and Henager, C.H.: Grain boundary junctions in microstructure generated by multiple twinning. Interface Sci. 11, 403 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, T.G., Xia, S., Li, H., Zhou, B.X., and Bai, Q.: The highly twinned grain boundary network formation during grain boundary engineering. Mater. Lett. 133, 97 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, T., Xia, S., Wang, B., Bai, Q., Zhou, B., and Su, C.: Grain orientation statistics of grain-clusters and the propensity of multiple-twinning during grain boundary engineering. Mater. Des. 112, 442 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lind, J., Li, S.F., and Kumar, M.: Twin related domains in 3D microstructures of conventionally processed and grain boundary engineered materials. Acta Mater. 114, 43 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, C.M., Leff, A.C., Demott, R.W., Doherty, R.D., and Taheri, M.L.: Unraveling the origin of twin related domains and grain boundary evolution during grain boundary engineering. Acta Mater. 144, 281 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, M., King, W.E., and Schwartz, A.J.: Modifications to the microstructural topology in f.c.c. materials through thermomechanical processing. Acta Mater. 48, 2081 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palumbo, G., King, P.J., Aust, K.T., Erb, U., and Lichtenberger, P.C.: Grain boundary design and control for intergranular stress-corrosion resistance. Scr. Metall. Mater. 25, 1775 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsurekawa, S., Nakamichi, S., and Watanabe, T.: Correlation of grain boundary connectivity with grain boundary character distribution in austenitic stainless steel. Acta Mater. 54, 3617 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tokita, S., Kokawa, H., Sato, Y.S., and Fujii, H.T.: In situ EBSD observation of grain boundary character distribution evolution during thermomechanical process used for grain boundary engineering of 304 austenitic stainless steel. Mater. Charact. 131, 31 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frary, M. and Schuh, C.A.: Connectivity and percolation behaviour of grain boundary networks in three dimensions. Philos. Mag. 85, 1123 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, T., Xia, S., Zhou, B., Bai, Q., and Rohrer, G.S.: Three-dimensional characteristics of the grain boundary networks of conventional and grain boundary engineered 316L stainless steel. Mater. Charact. 133, 60 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, M.A. and Murr, L.E.: A model for the formation of annealing twins in F.C.C. metals and alloys. Acta Metall. 26, 951 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bystrzycki, J. and Przetakiewicz, W.: 3-Dimensional reconstruction of annealing twins shape in FCC metals by serial sectioning. Scr. Metall. Mater. 27, 893 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telang, A., Gill, A.S., Kumar, M., Teysseyre, S., Qian, D., Mannava, S.R., and Vasudevan, V.K.: Iterative thermomechanical processing of alloy 600 for improved resistance to corrosion and stress corrosion cracking. Acta Mater. 113, 180 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, M.N., Glowinski, K., Nuhfer, N.T., and Rohrer, G.S.: The five parameter grain boundary character distribution of α-Ti determined from three-dimensional orientation data. Acta Mater. 111, 22 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konrad, J., Zaefferer, S., and Raabe, D.: Investigation of orientation gradients around a hard Laves particle in a warm-rolled Fe3Al-based alloy using a 3D EBSD-FIB technique. Acta Mater. 54, 1369 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchic, M.D., Groeber, M.A., Dimiduk, D.M., and Simmons, J.P.: 3D microstructural characterization of nickel superalloys via serial-sectioning using a dual beam FIB-SEM. Scr. Mater. 55, 23 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, A.C., Bingert, J.F., Rowenhorst, D.J., Gupta, A., Geltmacher, A.B., and Spanos, G.: Two- and three-dimensional microstructural characterization of a super-austenitic stainless steel. Mat. Sci. Eng., A 418, 11 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowenhorst, D.J., Lewis, A.C., and Spanos, G.: Three-dimensional analysis of grain topology and interface curvature in a beta-titanium alloy. Acta Mater. 58, 5511 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, F.X., Godfrey, A., Jensen, D.J., and Winther, G.: 3D EBSD characterization of deformation structures in commercial purity aluminum. Mater. Charact. 61, 1203 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spowart, J.E.: Automated serial sectioning for 3-D analysis of microstructures. Scr. Mater. 55, 5 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groeber, M. and Jackson, M.: DREAM.3D: A digital representation environment for the analysis of microstructure in 3D. Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov. 3, 1 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayachit, U.: The ParaView Guide: A Parallel Visualization Application (Published by Kitware, Clifton Park, NY, 2015); pp. 1–276.Google Scholar
Groeber, M., Ghosh, S., Uchic, M.D., and Dimiduk, D.M.: A framework for automated analysis and simulation of 3D polycrystalline microstructures: Part 1: Statistical characterization. Acta Mater. 56, 1257 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groeber, M., Ghosh, S., Uchic, M., and Dimiduk, D.: A framework for automated analysis and simulation of 3d polycrystalline microstructures. Part 2: Synthetic structure generation. Acta Mater. 56, 1275 (2008).Google Scholar
Bhandari, Y., Sarkar, S., Groeber, M., Uchic, M.D., Dimiduk, D.M., and Ghosh, S.: 3D polycrystalline microstructure reconstruction from FIB generated serial sections for FE analysis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 41, 222 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandon, D.G.: The structure of high-angle grain boundaries. Acta Metall. 14, 1479 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, M.A.: Basic Topology (Published by Springer, Berlin, 2010); pp. 115–161.Google Scholar
Randle, V.: Twinning-related grain boundary engineering. Acta Mater. 52, 4067–4081 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fullman, R.L. and Fisher, J.C.: Formation of annealing twins during grain growth. J. Appl. Phys. 22, 1350 (1951).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dash, S. and Brown, N.: An investigation of the origin and growth of annealing twins. Acta Metall. 11, 1067 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodhew, P.J.: Annealing twin formation by boundary dissociation. Met. Sci. 13, 108 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haasen, P.: How are new orientations generated during primary recrystallization? MTA 24, 1001 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, D.P., Bradford, L.T., Nowell, M.M., and Lillo, T.M.: The role of annealing twins during recrystallization of Cu. Acta Mater. 55, 4233 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleiter, H.: The formation of annealing twins. Acta Metall. 17, 1421 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottstein, G.: Annealing texture development by multiple twinning in f.c.c. crystals. Acta Metall. 32, 1117 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, B.W. and Kumar, M.: Mathematical methods for analyzing highly-twinned grain boundary networks. Scr. Mater. 54, 1029 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cayron, C.: Quantification of multiple twinning in face centred cubic materials. Acta Mater. 59, 252 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deepak, K., Mandal, S., Athreya, C.N., Kim, D-I., Boer, B.d., and Subramanya Sarma, V.: Implication of grain boundary engineering on high temperature hot corrosion of alloy 617. Corros. Sci. 106, 293 (2016).Google Scholar
Randle, V. and Jones, R.: Grain boundary plane distributions and single-step versus multiple-step grain boundary engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 524, 134 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, L., Sridharan, K., and Allen, T.R.: Effect of thermomechanical processing on grain boundary character distribution of a Ni-based superalloy. J. Nucl. Mater. 371, 171 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimada, M., Kokawa, H., Wang, Z.J., Sato, Y.S., and Karibe, I.: Optimization of grain boundary character distribution for intergranular corrosion resistant 304 stainless steel by twin-induced grain boundary engineering. Acta Mater. 50, 2331 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Liu et al. supplementary material

Figures S1-S9

Download Liu et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 29.6 MB