Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T07:52:08.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The stability of Si1−xGex strained layers on small-area trench-isolated silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

K. Schonenberg
Affiliation:
IBM Research Division, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
Siu-Wai Chan
Affiliation:
Columbia University, 1136 S.W. Mudd, New York, New York 10027
D. Harame
Affiliation:
IBM Research Division, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
M. Gilbert
Affiliation:
IBM Research Division, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
C. Stanis
Affiliation:
IBM Research Division, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
L. Gignac
Affiliation:
IBM Research Division, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
Get access

Abstract

The combined effects of isolation stress, active area size, and SiGe misfit strain on dislocation generation in an advanced SiGe heterojunction bipolar transistor (HBT) process were studied. Eight-inch wafers were patterned with polysilicon-filled deep, and oxide-filled shallow trench isolation similar to that used in IBM's analog SiGe HBT technology. Half of the wafers were subjected to an additional stress-producing oxidation prior to SiGe growth. Si1−xGex films containing 0, 5.5, 9, and 13 at.% Ge were grown epitaxially by ultrahigh vacuum chemical vapor deposition (UHV CVD). The films were of constant thickness with an intrinsic Si cap. Some samples received an additional relaxation anneal following deposition. After the growth and anneal cycles, the dislocation density was determined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). On nonstressed samples, no dislocations were observed in the device areas, even at Ge concentrations which are not stable to misfit dislocation generation in blanket form. This small area effect has been observed on patterned substrates that do not have functional device isolation. On the stressed-isolation wafers, the compressive stress from the oxidation of the trench sidewalls was found to intensify stress in the SiGe films, and to lower the critical strain at which misfit dislocations appeared. In large active areas on these wafers, two distinct dislocation regions were observed. Defects at the edge resembled those caused by isolation stress, while the defects in the center were more typical of the misfit dislocations associated with lattice-mismatch epitaxial films. It is clear that isolation stress must be minimized when fabricating integrated circuits using SiGe epitaxial films. It is also evident that SiGe films grown on nonstressed isolation exhibit the same increase in critical thickness with decreasing lateral dimension that has been observed on much simpler patterned substrates.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Harame, D. L., Stork, J. M. C., Meyerson, B. S., Hsu, K. Y-J., Cotte, J., Jenkins, K. A., Cressler, J. D., Restle, P., Crabbé, E. F., Subbanna, S., Tice, T. E., Scharf, B. W., and Yasaitis, J. A., Int. Elec. Devices Meeting Tech. Dig., p. 71 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Glenn, J., Case, M., Harame, D., Meyerson, B., and Poisson, R., Bipolar Circuits Tech. Meeting Proc., p. 186 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Case, M., Knorr, S., Larson, L., Rensch, D., Harame, D., Meyerson, B., and Rosenbaum, S., Bipolar Circuits Tech. Meeting Proc., p. 121 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Harame, D., Schonenberg, K., Gilbert, M., Nguyen-Ngoc, D., Malinowski, J., Jeng, S-J., Meyerson, B., Cressler, J., Groves, R., Berg, G., Tallman, K., Stein, K., Hueckel, G., Kermarrec, C., Tice, T., Fitzgibbons, G., Walter, K., Colavito, D., Houghton, T., Greco, N., Kebede, T., Cunningham, B., Subbanna, S., Comfort, J., and Crabbé, E., Int. Elec. Devices Meeting Tech. Dig., p. 437 (1994).Google Scholar
5.van der Merwe, J. V., Single Crystal Films, edited by Francombe, M. H. and Sato, H. (Pergamon, Oxford, 1964), p. 139.Google Scholar
6.Matthews, J. W. and Blakeslee, A. E., J. Cryst. Growth 27, 118 (1974).Google Scholar
7.Stiffler, S. R., Comfort, J., Stanis, C. L., Harame, D. L., de Frésart, E., and Meyerson, B. S., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 1416 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Stiffler, S. R., Stanis, C. L., Goorsky, M., Chan, K. K., and de Frésart, E., J. Appl. Phys. 71, 4820 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Nishida, A., Nakagawa, K., Murakami, E., and Miyao, M., J. Appl. Phys. 71, 5913 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Vescan, L., Stoica, T., Dieker, C., and Luth, H., in Silicon-Based Optoelectronic Materials, edited by Tischler, M. A., Collins, R. T., Thewalt, M. L. W., and Abstreiter, G. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 298, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993), p. 45.Google Scholar
11.Fitzgerald, E. A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 7, 782 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Stiffler, S. R., Laskey, J. B., Koburger, C. W., and Berry, W. S., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 37, 1253 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Takano, Y. and Kozuka, H., in Proc. 14th Conf. (1982 Int.) on Solid State Devices (Tokyo, 1982); Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 22, suppl. 22–1, 553 (1983).Google Scholar
14.Fahey, P. M., Mader, S., Stiffler, S. R., Mohler, R. L., Mis, J. D., and Slinkman, J. A., IBM J. Res. Dev. 36, 158 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Harame, D. L., Comfort, J. H., Cressler, J. D., Crabbé, E. F., Sun, Y-C., Meyerson, B. S., and Tice, T., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 42, 455 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Meyerson, B. S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 48, 797 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Tsao, J. Y. and Dodson, B. W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 848 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Matsuda, S., Yoshino, C., Nakajima, H., Inou, K., Yoshitomi, S., Katsumata, Y., and Iwai, H., Int. Elec. Devices Meeting Tech. Dig. (1994), p. 885.Google Scholar