Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:36:02.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Solid-state reaction mechanism for the formation of Ba6−xLn8+2 x/3Ti18O54 (Ln = Nd, Sm) solid solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Anatolii G Belous
Affiliation:
V.I. Vernadskii Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of Ukrainian National Academy of Sciences, Kiev, Ukraine
Oleg V. Ovchar
Affiliation:
V.I. Vernadskii Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of Ukrainian National Academy of Sciences, Kiev, Ukraine
Matjaz Valant
Affiliation:
“Jozef Stefan” Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Danilo Suvorov
Affiliation:
“Jozef Stefan” Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Get access

Abstract

A solid-state reaction mechanism for the formation of Ba6−xLn8+2x /3Ti18O54 (Ln = Nd, Sm) solid solutions has been studied using x-ray powder diffraction, thermal analyses, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). During the interaction of the starting reagents, Ln2Ti2O7, BaTi4O9, and BaTiO3 are formed. In the next sequence, these three phases react together to form a high-x end member of the Ba6−xLn8+2x /3Ti18O54 homogeneity region (Ba3.9Nd9.4Ti18O54 and Ba3.9Sm9.4Ti18O54). Subsequently, the reaction of Ba3.9Nd9.4Ti18O54 and Ba3.9Sm9.4Ti18O54 with the residual BaTiO3 takes place. TEM investigations revealed that compositional inhomogeneities and structural defects existed in the Ba4Sm9.33Ti18O54 sample heated at 1370 °C for 1 h. Sintering times, prolonged to ≥3 h, eliminated the structural defects and increased the homogeneity of the sample.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Fukuda, K., Fujii, I., Kitoh, R., Cho, Y., and Awai, I., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 1712 (1993).Google Scholar
2Ohsato, H., Imaeda, M., Takagi, Y., Komura, A., Okuda, T., and Nishigaki, S., edited by Colla, E. and Damjanovic, D. (Proc. 11th IEEE Int. Symp. Appl. Ferroelectr., Montreux, Switzerland, 1998), p. 509.Google Scholar
3Belous, A.G., Ovchar, O.V., Valant, M., and Suvorov, D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 1707 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Negas, T. and Davies, P.K., Ceram. Trans. 53, 179 (1995).Google Scholar
5Suvorov, D., Valant, M., and Kolar, D., J. Mater. Sci. 32, 6483 (1997).Google Scholar
6Matveeva, R.G., Varfolomev, M.B., and Il’yuhchenko, L.S., Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 29, 17 (1984).Google Scholar
7Azough, F., Setaswuwon, P., and Freer, R., Ceram. Trans. 53, 215 (1995).Google Scholar
8Rawn, C.J., Birnie, D.P., Bruck, M.A., Enemark, J.H., and Roth, R.S., J. Mater. Res. 13, 187 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Ohsato, H., Ohhashi, T., Nishigaki, S., Okuda, T., Sumia, K., and Suzuki, S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 4323 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Takahashi, J., Ikegami, T., and Kageyama, K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 1868 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Wu, J.M., Chang, M.C., and Yao, P.C., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 1599 (1990).Google Scholar
12Templeton, L.K. and Pask, J.A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 42, 212 (1959).Google Scholar
13Abe, M. and Uchino, K., Mater. Res. Bull. 9, 147 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar