Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T22:41:18.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Model for the temperature dependent transmission of optically transparent poly(methyl methacrylate) composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Hongy Lin
Affiliation:
Department of Ceramic Engineering, Graduate Center for Materials Research, University of Missouri–Rolla, Rolla, Missouri 65401-0249
Delbert E. Day
Affiliation:
Department of Ceramic Engineering, Graduate Center for Materials Research, University of Missouri–Rolla, Rolla, Missouri 65401-0249
James O. Stoffer
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Graduate Center for Materials Research, University of Missouri–Rolla, Rolla, Missouri 65401-0249
Get access

Abstract

An infinite cylinder model was used to predict the optical transmission of transparent composites containing unidirectionally aligned glass fibers. The parameters used in the model are the volume content and diameter of the glass fibers, the refractive index of the fiber and matrix, the nonwet fiber content, the thickness of the composite, and the temperature coefficient of the refractive index of the matrix. The transmission calculated from the model agreed well with the measured temperature-dependent transmission of a composite from 20 to 70 °C for thin specimen (<1.0 mm) containing fiber less than 10 vol. %. The model showed that a small amount of nonwet fiber (0.7% of fiber content) could cause a substantial reduction in the maximum transmission. The content of nonwet fibers should be as small as possible for making a highly transparent composite.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Marcuse, D.Light Transmission Optics (Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc., New York, 1982).Google Scholar
2Lin, H.Day, D.E. and Staffer, J.O.Polym. Eng. Sci. 32, 344 (1992).Google Scholar
3Robinson, H. A.Ruggy, R. and Slantz, E.J. Appl. Phys. 15, 343 (1944).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Michel, P.Dugas, J.Cariou, J. M. and Martin, L.J. Macromol. B 25, 379 (1986).Google Scholar
5Polymer Handbook, 2nd ed., edited by Brandrup, J. and Immergut, E. H. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1975).Google Scholar
6Cariou, J. M.Dugas, J.Martin, L. and Michel, P.Appl. Opt. 25, 334 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Optical Glass, Schott Glass Technologies Inc., Duryea, PA (1982).Google Scholar
8Hulst, H. C. van de, Light Scattering by Small Particles (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1957).Google Scholar
9Bohren, C. F. and Huffman, D. R.Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1983).Google Scholar
10Born, M. and Wolf, E.Principles of Optics (Pergamon Press, New York, 1959).Google Scholar
11Chistyakov, Ye.V.Arkhireyev, O. S. and Zetev, B.M.Polym. Sci. U.S.S.R. 26, 2116 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Read, B.E.J. Polym. Sci. C 16, 1887 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar