Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-16T12:27:32.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructure of entrained air voids in concrete, Part II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Ahmed I. Rashed
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
Robert Brady Williamson
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
Get access

Abstract

The microstructure of air voids in both air-entrained and non air-entrained paste, mortar, and concrete containing silica fume has been studied at different ages (5 min to 60 days) in order to understand how air-entrained voids form in portland cement–silica fume systems. Scanning electron micrographs of air voids are presented for many different ages. The solidification process of portland cement–paste and mortar was frozen at different ages using both a low-temperature scanning electron microscope and freeze drying. During the course of these experiments, it was discovered that air voids can be considered “windows” in the microstructure in which one can observe early hydration features that give insight into the nature of portland-cement systems. A well-developed sheaf of wheat morphology has been observed in concretes incorporating silica fume, and a new interpretation of the microstructure of silica fume concrete is presented.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Fédération Internationale de la Précontrainte (FIP), “Condensed Silica Fume in Concrete”, State of the Art Report, London, Thomas Telford, 1938, 37 p.Google Scholar
2.Sakar, S. L. and Aitcin, P. C., Cement and Concrete Res. 17 (4), 591601 (1987).Google Scholar
3.Roy, D. M., in Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag, and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete, ACI SP-114 (American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI, 1989), pp. 117137.Google Scholar
4.Mehta, P. K., in Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag, and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete, ACI SP-114 (American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI, 1989), pp. 2443.Google Scholar
5.Traetteberg, A., in Durability of Building Materials and Components, ASTM Special Technical Publication STP 691 (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1980), pp. 536548.Google Scholar
6.Cheng-Yi, H. and Feldman, R. F., Cement and Concrete Res. 15 (2), 285294 (1985).Google Scholar
7.Feldman, R. F. and H. Cheng-Yi, Cement and Concrete Res. 15, 765774 (1985).Google Scholar
8.Buil, M. and Delage, P., Cement and Concrete Res. 17, 6569 (1987).Google Scholar
9.Philleo, R., “Frost Susceptibility of High Strength Concrete”, in Concrete Durability, Katharine and Bryant Mather Int. Conf., ACI SP-100(American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI, 1987), pp. 819842.Google Scholar
10.Foy, C., Pigeon, M., and Banthia, N., Cement and Concrete Res. 18 (4), 604614 (1988).Google Scholar
11.Berger, R. L. and McGregor, J. D., “Influence of Temperature and Water-Solid Ratio on Growth and Morphology of Calcium Hydroxide Formed During the Hydration of C3S”, presented at West Coast Meeting, The American Ceramic Society, Pasadena, CA, 1968.Google Scholar
12.Williamson, R. B., J. Cryst. Growth 34, 787794 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Buckley, H. E., Crystal Growth (John Wiley, New York, 1951), p. 500.Google Scholar
14.Keith, H. D. and Padden, F. J., J. Appl. Phys. 34 (8), 24092421 (1963).Google Scholar
15.Chalmers, B., Principles of Solidification (John Wiley, New York, 1964), p. 223.Google Scholar
16.Groves, G. W., Cement and Concrete Res. 11, 713718 (1981).Google Scholar
17.Williamson, R. B. and Rashed, A. I., in Very High Strength Cement-Based Materials, edited by Young, J. F. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 42, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985), pp. 295303.Google Scholar