Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T16:24:12.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kinetics of Thermal Grain Boundary Grooving for Changing Dihedral Angles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

W. Zhang ,
P. Sachenko  and
J. H. Schneibel
W. Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan 48309
P. Sachenko
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Oakland University, Rochester, 48309
J. H. Schneibel
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831–6115
Get access

Abstract

In his classic paper on thermal grain boundary grooving Mullins [W.W. Mullins, J. Appl. Physics 28, 333 (1957)] assumes that the dihedral angle at the groove root remains constant and predicts that the groove width and depth grow αt0.25. Here, we derive models describing groove growth while the dihedral angle changes. In our grooving experiments with tungsten at 1350 °C in which the dihedral angle decreased, the growth exponent for the groove depth reached values as high as 0.44 while the growth exponent for the width decreased slightly from Mullins' value of 0.25. Hence groove width data alone are not sufficient for verifying Mullins' growth law unless the dihedral angle is constant. The observed changes in the dihedral angle are used as an input for numerical simulations. With the simulations we are able to extract the surface diffusion constants. Atomic force microscope observations of groove widths and depths in tungsten are in excellent agreement with the simulations.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 17 , Issue 6 , June 2002 , pp. 1495 - 1501
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Mullins, W.W., J. Appl. Phys. 28, 333 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Shin, W., Seo, W-S., and Koumoto, K., J. European Ceramic Soc. 18, 595 (1998).Google Scholar
3.Jin, M., Shimada, E., and Ikuma, Y.J., J. Mater. Res . 14, 2548 (1999).Google Scholar
4.Simon, C.J., Thesis, M.S., The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee (1999).Google Scholar
5.Herring, C., in The Physics of Powder Metallurgy, edited by Kinston, W.E. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1951), p. 143.Google Scholar
6.Lee, K-Y. and Case, E.D., Eur. Phys. J. AP 8, 197 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Sachenko, P., Schneibel, J.H., and Zhang, W., Philos. Mag. A 82, 815 (2002).Google Scholar
8.Sachenko, P., Ph.D. Thesis, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan (2001).Google Scholar
9.Elliott, C.M. and Garche, H., Adv. Math. Sci. Appl. 7, 467 (1997).Google Scholar
10.Robertson, W.M., J. Appl. Phys. 42, 463 (1971).Google Scholar
11.Zhang, W. and Schneibel, J.H., Comp. Mater. Sci. 3, 347 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Genin, F.Y., Mullins, W.W., and Wynblatt, P., Acta Metall. Mater. 40, 3239 (1992).Google Scholar
13.Sun, B. and Suo, Z., Acta Mater. 45, 4953 (1997).Google Scholar
14.Coleman, B.D., Falk, R.S., and Moakher, M., Siam J. Sci. Comput. 17, 1434 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Khenner, M., Averbuch, A., Israeli, M., and Nathan, M., J. Comp. Phys. 170, 764 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Numerical Algorithms Group, NAG Fortran Library (Mark 19, Downers Grove, IL, 1999), available from http//www.nag.comGoogle Scholar
17.Zhang, W. and Gladwell, I., in Numerical Treatment of Multiphase Flows in Porous Media, edited by Chen, Z., Ewing, R.E, and Shi, Z-C., p. 419. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin//Heidelberg, 1999).Google Scholar
18.Zhang, W. and Schneibel, J.H., Acta Metall. Mater. 43, 4377 (1995).Google Scholar
19.Brown, P.N., Byrne, G.D., and Hindmarsh, A.C., Siam J. Sci. Comput. 10, 1038 (1989).Google Scholar
20.German, R.M., Sintering Theory and Practice (Wiley, New York, 1996, p. 533).Google Scholar