Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:05:11.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intracrystalline Microstructure of Synthetic Merwinite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Koichiro Fukuda
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Nagoya 466–8555, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Crystals of merwinite were prepared at 1550 °C from chemical reagents, and their intracrystalline microstructures were examined by the combined use of x-ray diffraction and optical microscopy. The crystals were composed of pseudomerohedral twins. The adjacent twin domains were related by the pseudosymmetry two-fold axis parallel to ⟨011⟩with the composition surface {811} The overall twin structure was constructed by introducing the pseudo-symmetry three-fold axis normal to (100), which must originally be a symmetry element of the former high-symmetry phase. The transition from the primitive trigonal (point group 3m) to the primitive monoclinic (space group P21/a) was accompanied by the combination of reducing the order of the point group and the change in the size of the unit cell. The order of the point group was reduced from 12 to 4, resulting in three twin domains with six different interfaces. This accounted for the experimentally observed microstructure consisting of repeated lamella twins in several orientations. Because the unit lattice translation would be lost during the transition, the formation of antiphase domains was expected. The lost translation vectors were 1/2[011], 1/2[100], and 1/2[111] resulting in four antiphase domains. As a result, the total number of domains possible in the transition was 3 × 4 = 12.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Nord, G.L. Jr, in Minerals and Reactions at the Atomic Scale: Transmission Electron Microscopy: Imaging Transformation-Induced Microstructures, edited by Buseck, P.R. (Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, DC, 1992), pp. 455508.Google Scholar
2.Moore, P.B. and Araki, T., Am. Mineral. 57, 1355 (1972).Google Scholar
3.Moore, P.B., Am. Mineral. 58, 32 (1973).Google Scholar
4.Okada, K. and Ossaka, J., Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 36, 919 (1980).Google Scholar
5.Larsen, E.S. and Foshag, W.F., Am. Mineral. 6, 143 (1921).Google Scholar
6.Tilley, C.E., Mineral. Mag. 22, 77 (1929).Google Scholar
7.Nawaz, R. and Preston, J., Mineralogical Mag. 59, 1117 (1974).Google Scholar
8.Toraya, H., J. Appl. Crystallogr. 19, 440 (1986).Google Scholar
9.Izumi, F., in The Rietveld Method: Rietveld Analysis Programs RIETAN and PREMOS and Special Applications, edited by Young, R.A. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993), pp. 236253.Google Scholar
10.Salje, E.K.H, Phase Transitions in Ferroelastic and Coelastic Crystals (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1990).Google Scholar