Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T18:33:41.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Grain boundary strengthening in copper/niobium multilayered foils and fine-grained niobium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

A.C. Lewis*
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
C. Eberl
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
K.J. Hemker
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University, Departments of Materials Science and Engineering, and Mechanical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
T.P. Weihs
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University, Departments of Materials Science and Engineering, and Mechanical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: alexis.lewis@nrl.navy.mil Present address: Naval Research Laboratory, Multifunctional Materials Branch, Washington, DC, 20375.
Get access

Abstract

Uniaxial tensile tests were performed on Cu/Nb multilayered foils to investigate yield strength and grain boundary strengthening in the layered foils at room temperature and in fine-grained Nb at 600 °C. At room temperature, yielding in Cu/Nb multilayered foils is controlled by deformation in both layers, and grain boundary strengthening is observed with a Hall–Petch slope (kRT) of 198 ± 56 MPa·μm1/2 at a strain rate of 10−4 s−1. At 600 °C, yielding in Cu/Nb multilayered foils is controlled by deformation in just the Nb layers. Hall–Petch strengthening is observed over a range of strain rates, but the Hall–Petch slope decreases from 197 ± 71 MPa·μm1/2 for a strain rate of 10−4 s−1 to only 25 ± 40 MPa·μm1/2 for a strain rate of 10−6 s−1. The significant drop in the Hall–Petch slope for Nb with decreasing strain rate indicates a change in the controlling deformation mechanism from dislocation glide to dislocation creep.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Ahuja, R.Fraser, H.L.: Microstructural transitions in titanium–aluminum thin-film multilayers. J. Electron. Mater. 23, 1027 1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Anderson, P.M., Bingert, J.F., Misra, A.Hirth, J.P.: Rolling textures in nanoscale Cu/Nb multilayers. Acta Mater. 51, 6059 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Cammarata, R.C., Schlesinger, T.E., Kim, C., Qadri, S.B.Edelstein, A.S.: Nanoindentation study of the mechanical properties of copper–nickel multilayered thin-films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 1862 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Dück, A., Gamer, N., Gesatzke, W., Griepentrog, M., Österle, W., Sahre, M.Urban, I.: Ti/TiN multilayer coatings: Deposition technique, characterization and mechanical properties. Surf. Coat. Technol. 142, 579 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Lehoczky, S.L.: Retardation of dislocation generation and motion in thin- layered metal laminates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1814 1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Mitchell, T.E., Lu, Y.C., Griffin, A.J., Nastasi, M.Kung, H.: Structure and mechanical properties of copper/niobium multilayers. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80, 1673 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Ruud, J.A., Jervis, T.R.Spaepen, F.: Nanoindentation of Ag/Ni multilayered thin-films. J. Appl. Phys. 75, 4969 1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Tambwe, M.F., Stone, D.S., Griffin, A.J., Kung, H., Lu, Y.C.Nastasi, M.: Haasen plot analysis of the Hall–Petch effect in Cu/Nb nanolayer composites. J. Mater. Res. 14, 407 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Tench, D.White, J.: Enhanced tensile strength for electrodeposited nickel–copper multilayer composites. Metall. Trans. A 15, 2039 1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Tixier, S., Boni, P.Van Swygenhoven, H.: Hardness enhancement of sputtered Ni3Al/Ni multilayers. Thin Solid Films 342, 188 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Genin, F.Y.: Effect of stress on grain boundary motion in thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 77, 5130 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Frost, H.J.Ashby, M.F.: Deformation-Mechanism Maps Pergamon Press New York 1982 20–42Google Scholar
13Misra, A., Hoagland, R.G.Kung, H.: Thermal stability of self-supported nanolayered Cu/Nb films. Philos. Mag. 84, 1021 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Lewis, A.C., Van Heerden, D., Josell, D.Weihs, T.P.: Creep deformation in multilayered and microlaminate materials. JOM 55, 34 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Eberl, C., Lewis, A.C., Weihs, T.P.Hemker, K.J.: Microstructural stability of Cu/Nb multilayers during high-temperature creep (unpublished research) 2007Google Scholar
16Lewis, A.C.: The Effect of Interfaces on the Stability and Mechanical Properties of Polycrystalline Multilayers Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD 2003Google Scholar
17Conrad, H., Feuerstein, S.Rice, L.: Effects of grain size on the dislocation density and flow stress of niobium. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2, 157 1967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Omar, A.M.Entwisle, A.R.: Effect of grain size on deformation of niobium. Mater. Sci. Eng. 5, 263 1969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Szkopiak, Z.C.: Hall–Petch parameters of niobium determined by grain-size and extrapolation methods. Mater. Sci. Eng. 9, 7 1972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Hansen, N.Ralph, B.: The strain and grain size dependence of the flow stress of copper. Acta Met. 30, 411 1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar