Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:02:41.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Formation of eutectic RuAl/Ru nanocomposite by mechanical alloying and subsequent annealing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

K. W. Liu ,
F. Mücklich  and
R. Birringer
K. W. Liu*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Functional Materials, Building 22, Saarland University, P.O. Box 151150, Saarbrücken, D-66041, Germany
F. Mücklich
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Functional Materials, Building 22, Saarland University, P.O. Box 151150, Saarbrücken, D-66041, Germany
R. Birringer
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Building 43, Saarland University, P.O. Box 151150, Saarbrücken, D-66041, Germany
*
a)Address correspondence to this author.wf11fmkl@mail.rz.uni-sb.de
Get access

Abstract

No abrupt reaction was observed during mechanical alloying (MA) of Ru and Al powder mixtures with an eutectic composition (Ru70Al30). As-milled powders constitute mainly a Ru(Al) solid solution and/or mixture (matrix), and a very small quantity of RuAl. The complete reaction between Ru and Al during MA was speculated to be hampered by excess Ru in Ru70Al30. No exothermic heat release was detected in differential scanning calorimetry for as-milled powders. Precipitation of RuAl from as-milled Ru(Al) matrix was observed after annealing at various temperatures. The phase fraction of Ru and RuAl reaches an approximately equilibrium value after annealing at 1173 K.

Type
Rapid Communications
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 16 , Issue 9 , September 2001 , pp. 2459 - 2462
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Fleischer, R.L., Metall. Trans. 24A, 227 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Fleischer, R.L., Field, R.D., and Briant, C.L., Metall. Trans. 22A, 403 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Wolff, I.M., J. Metals 49, 34 (1997).Google Scholar
4Wolff, I.M. and Sauthoff, G., Acta Mater. 45, 2949 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, edited by Massalski, T.B. (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1986), p. 158.Google Scholar
6Snow, D.W. and Breedis, J.F., Acta Mater. 22, 419 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Wolff, I.M. and Sauthoff, G., Metall. Trans. 27A, 2642 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8K, Lu, Prog. Mater. Sci. Eng. R16, 161 (1996).Google Scholar
9Gleiter, H., Prog. Mater. Sci. 33, 223 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Murty, B.S. and Ranganathan, S., Int. Mater. Rev. 43, 101 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Koch, C.C., Nanostruct. Mater. 2, 109 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Liu, K.W., Mücklich, F., and Birringer, R., Intermetallics 9, 81 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Klug, H.P. and Alexander, L., X-ray Diffraction Procedures for Polycrystalline and Amorphous Materials, 2nd ed. (John Wiley, New York, 1974), p. 661.Google Scholar
14Jung, W.J. and Kleppa, O.J., Metall. Trans. 23B, 53 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar