Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T03:56:04.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental measurement and numerical simulation of the plastic strain during indentation and scratch tests on polymeric surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Hervé Pelletier*
Affiliation:
Institut Charles Sadron, UPR 22 CNRS F-67034 Strasbourg, Cedex 2, France
Christian Gauthier
Affiliation:
Institut Charles Sadron, UPR 22 CNRS F-67034 Strasbourg, Cedex 2, France
Robert Schirrer
Affiliation:
Institut Charles Sadron, UPR 22 CNRS F-67034 Strasbourg, Cedex 2, France
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: pelletier@ics.u-strasbg.fr
Get access

Abstract

For elastic–plastic contacts, we propose a complete description of the plastic strain field beneath the indenter during indentation and scratch with a spherical indenter (with R, the tip radius), as a function of the testing conditions, defined by the geometrical strain, noted a/R (with a, the contact radius), and the local friction coefficient μloc. The main parameter of the description is the level of the plastic deformation imposed during test into amorphous polymeric surfaces, related in first approximation to the ratio a/R. An equivalent average plastic strain, noted (εp)av, is calculated over a representative plastically deformed volume, both for indentation and scratch tests. The equivalent average plastic strain (εp)av, is observed to increase with the ratio a/R, as predicted by the empirical Tabor's rule, but also with the local friction coefficient μloc for a given ratio a/R, especially during scratching. The plastic zone dimensions and the plastic strain gradient developed beneath the moving tip are shown to depend both on the geometrical strain a/R and also on the friction coefficient μloc.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Gane, N. and Cox, J.M.: The micro-hardness of metals at very low loads. Philos. Mag. 22, 881 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Tabor, D.: Indentation hardness and its measurements in micro-indentation techniques, in Materials Science and Engineering, edited by Blau, P.J. and Lawn, B.R. (ASTM International, Warren-dale, PA, 1985), pp. 129159.Google Scholar
3.Gilormini, P. and Felder, E.: Theoretical and experimental study of the ploughing of a rigid plastic semi-infinite body by a rigid pyramidal indenter. Wear 88, 195 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Black, A.J., Koplainsky, E.M., and Oxley, P.L.B.: An investigation of the different regimes of deformation which can occur when a hard wedge slides over a soft surface: The influence of wedge angle, lubrification and prior plastic working of the surface. Wear 123, 97 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Gauthier, C. and Schirrer, R.: Time and temperature dependence of the scratch properties of poly(methylmethacrylate) surfaces. J. Mater. Sci. 35, 2121 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Pelletier, H., Mendibide, C., and Riche, A.: Mechanical characterization of polymeric films using depth sensing instrument: Correlation between visco-elasto-plastic properties and scratch resistance. Prog. Org. Coat. 62, 162 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Lafaye, S., Gauthier, C., and Schirrer, R.: A surface flow line model of a scratching tip: Apparent and true local friction coefficients. Tribol. Int. 38, 113 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Tabor, D.: The hardness of solids. Proc. Inst. Phys. F, Phys. Technol. 1, 145 (1970).Google Scholar
9.Gauthier, C., Lafaye, F., and Schirrer, R.: Elastic recovery of a scratch in a polymeric surface: Experiments and analysis. Tribol. Int. 34, 469 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Charrault, E., Gauthier, C., Marie, P., and Schirrer, R.: Structural recovery (physical ageing) of the friction coefficient of polymers. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 46, 1337 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Pelletier, H., Durier, A-L., Gauthier, C., and Schirrer, S.: Viscoelas-tic and elastic-plastic behavior of amorphous polymeric surfaces during scratch. Tribol. Int. 41, 975 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Pelletier, H., Gauthier, C., and Schirrer, R.: Experimental and finite element analysis of scratches on amorphous polymeric surfaces, in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J. J. Eng. Tribol. 222, 221 (2008).Google Scholar
13.Pelletier, H., Le Houerou, V., Gauthier, C., and Schirrer, R.: Experiments and finite element simulation of scratch: Friction and nonlinearity effects, in Tribology of Polymer, edited by Sinha, S.K. and Briscoe, B.J. (2008), Chap. 4, pp. 108140.Google Scholar
14.Gauthier, C., Durier, A-L., Fond, C., and Schirrer, R.: Scratching of a polymer and mechanical analysis of a scratch resistance solution, in Special Issue 180 Years of Scratch Testing, edited by Sinha, S.K.Tribol. Int. 39, 88 (2006).Google Scholar
15.Bucaille, J.L., Felder, E., and Hochstetter, G.: Mechanical analysis of the scratch test on elastic and perfectly plastic materials with the three-dimensional finite element modeling. Wear 249, 422 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Felder, E. and Bucaille, J.L.: Mechanical analysis of the scratching of metals and polymers with conical indenters at moderate and large strains, in Special Issue 180 Years of Scratch Testing, edited by S.K. Sinha. Tribol. Int. 39, 70 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Barge, M., Kermouche, G., Gilles, P., and Bergheau, J.M.: Experimental and numerical study of the ploughing part of abrasive wear. Wear 255, 30 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Bellemare, S.C., Dao, M., and Suresh, S.: Effects of mechanical properties and surface friction on elasto-plastique sliding contact. Mech. Mater. 40, 206 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Wredenberg, F. and Larsson, P.L.: On the numerics and correlation of scratch testing. J. Mech. Mater. Struct. 2, 573 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Bellemare, S.C., Dao, M., and Suresh, S.: The frictional sliding response of elasto-plastic materials in contact with a conical indenter. Int. J. Solids Struct. 44, 1970 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Bucaille, J.L., Gauthier, C., Felder, E., and Schirrer, R.: The influence of the strain hardening of polymers on the piling-up phenomenon during scratch tests: Experiments and numerical modeling. Wear 260, 803 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Subhash, G. and Zhang, W.: Investigation of the overall friction coefficient in single pass scratch test. Wear 252, 125 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Hamilton, G.M. and Goodman, L.E.: The stress field created by a circular sliding contact. J. Appl. Mech. 33, 371 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Hill, R.: The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity (Clanderon Press, Oxford, 1950).Google Scholar
25.Johnson, K.L.: The correlation of indentation experiments. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 18, 115 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Johnson, K.L.: Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, London, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Gao, X.L., Jing, X.N., and Subhash, G.: Two new expanding cavity models for indentation deformations of elastic strain hardening materials. Int. J. Solids Struct. 43, 2193 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Gao, X.L.: An new expanding cavity model incorporating strain-hardening and indentation size effects. Int. J. Solids Struct. 43, 6615 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Pane, I. and Blank, E.: Role of plasticity on indentation behavior: Relations between surface and subsurface responses. Int. J. Solids Struct. 43, 2014 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Jayaraman, S., Hahn, G.T., Oliver, W.C., Rubin, C.A., and Bastias, P.C.: Determination of monotonic stress-strain curve of hard materials from ultra-low-load indentation tests. Int. J. Solids Struct. 35, 365 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Ahn, J.H. and Kwon, D.: Derivation of plastic stress-strain relationship from ball indentations: Examination of strain definition and pileup effect. J. Mater. Res. 16, 3170 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar