Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T02:09:08.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Thermal Treatment on the Photocatalytic Activity of TiO2 Coatings for Photocatalytic Oxidation of Benzoic Acid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Alex H. C. Chan
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR), People's Republic of China
John F. Porter
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR), People's Republic of China
John P. Barford
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR), People's Republic of China
Chak K. Chan*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR), People's Republic of China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: keckchan@ust.hk
Get access

Abstract

The effects of thermal treatment on the properties and photoactivities of TiO2 catalysts supported on 316 stainless steel plates were examined. Degussa P-25 was immobilized on 316 stainless steel plates by electrophoretic deposition. These TiO2-coated plates were heated at 473, 673, and 873 K for 1 h. The photoactivities of these TiO2 coatings were determined based on the removal of benzoic acid as the model pollutant. In particular, the photoactivity decreased by 52% in the sample heated at 873 K compared with the unheated sample. The results of x-ray diffraction showed that the crystallinity and the crystallite sizes of the catalysts supported on the plates did not significantly vary with increasing temperature over the range examined. Negligible change in the catalyst phase (the anatase-to-rutile ratio) was indicated from x-ray diffraction and micro-Raman spectroscopy. However, it was found that the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area of the scraped catalysts heated at 873 K decreased by nearly 13% compared with the unheated sample. In addition, scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive x-ray and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analyses also detected the presence of Fe3+ ions at the surface of the supported catalysts heated at 873 K. The drop in surface area and the presence of Fe3+ ions at the catalyst surface, which were considered to function as electron–hole recombination centers, were possible factors leading to the drop in the photoactivity exhibited by the sample. A lower temperature for thermal treatment such as 473 K was proposed to ensure the coating stability and the catalyst photoactivity.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Wyness, P., Klausner, J.F., Goswami, D.Y., and Schanze, K.S., J. Solar Energy Eng. 116, 2 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenhammer, H., Bahnemann, D., Bousselmi, L., Geissen, S.U., Ghrabi, A., Saleh, F., Si-Salah, A., Siemon, U., and Vogelpohl, A., Water Sci. Technol. 35(4), 157 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goslich, R., Dillert, R., and Bahnemann, D., Water Sci. Technol. 35(4), 137 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sclafani, A., Sciascia, A., and Rizzuti, L., J. Adv. Oxidation Technol. 4, 91 (1999).Google Scholar
Ollis, D.F., Pelizzetti, E., and Serpone, N., Env. Sci. Technol. 25, 1523 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindner, F. and Feltz, A., Solid States Ionics 63–65, 13 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández, A., Lassaletta, G., V.M. Jime´nez, Justo, A., A.R. Gonza´lez-Elipe, Herrmann, J-M., Tahiri, H., and Ait-Ichou, Y., Appl. Catal. B: Env. 7, 49 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, J.A., Eggins, B.R., Brown, N.M.D., McKinney, B., and Rouse, M., Appl. Catal. B: Env. 17, 25 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahraa, O., Dorion, C., S.M. Ould-Mame, and Bouchy, M., J. Adv. Oxidation Technol. 4, 40 (1999).Google Scholar
Zhang, Y.H., Chan, C.K., Porter, J.F., and Guo, W., J. Mater. Res. 13, 2602 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, A.H.C., Porter, J.F., Barford, J.P., and Chan, C.K., Water Sci. Technol. 44(5), 187 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, A.H.C., MPhil. Thesis, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, 3-1-3-21 Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China (2001).Google Scholar
Pichat, P., in Proceedings of The Croucher Advanced Study Institute, edited by Yue, P.L. (Publishing Technology Center, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, 2000), pp. 1824.Google Scholar
Ding, X.Z. and Liu, X.H., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 15, 1789 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J.F., Li, Y.G., and Chan, C.C., J. Mater. Sci. 34, 1523 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, D.D. and Siegel, R.W., J. Mater. Res. 7, 2840 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickley, R.I., Lees, J.S., Palmisano, L., Schiavello, M., and Tilley, R.J.D., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 88, 377 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullity, B.D., Elements of X-ray diffraction, 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1978), pp. 81106.Google Scholar
Ha, H.Y. and Anderson, M.A., J. Env. Eng. 122, 217 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mu, W., Herrmann, J.M., and Pichat, P., Catal. Lett. 3, 73 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, J.C., Lin, J., Lo, D., and Lam, S.K., Langmuir 16, 7304 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, G.C., Heterogeneous Catalysis: Principles and Applications, 2nd ed. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1987), pp. 3847.Google Scholar
Gunter, P.L.J., Niemantsverdriet, J.W.H., Ribeiro, F.H., and Somorjai, G.A., Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 39, 77 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pichat, P., Guillard, C., Maillard, C., Amalric, L., J.C. D’Oliveira, in Photocatalytic Purification and Treatment of Water and Air, edited by Ollis, D.F. and Al-Ekabi, H. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, New York, 1993), pp. 207223.Google Scholar