Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-19T03:42:37.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Continuous hydrothermal crystallization of α–Fe2O3 and Co3O4 nanoparticles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Yalin Hao
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0100
Amyn S. Teja
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0100
Get access

Abstract

Iron oxide (α–Fe2O3) and cobalt oxide (Co3O4) were produced via precipitation reactions carried out in a continuous hydrothermal apparatus. The resulting particles were nanometer-sized because of the high supersaturations generated when metal nitrate solutions are combined with sodium hydroxide or with hot, compressed water. The average particle size increased with the metal nitrate feed concentration and with residence time. A logarithmic relationship was obtained between the particle size and feed concentration and between particle size and residence time in the apparatus. The production of nanoparticles with narrow size distribution was shown to require low metal nitrate feed concentrations and short residence times. In the range of temperatures studied in this work, temperature apparently had no effect on the size except when cobalt nitrate was contacted with supercritical water in the absence of sodium hydroxide. In this case, large cobalt oxide particles were obtained when the temperature was above the critical temperature of water.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Jocoby, M., Chem. Eng. News June 12, 37 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichinose, N., Ozaki, Y., and Kash, S., Superfine Particles Technology (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992).Google Scholar
Rosensweig, R.E., Sci. Am. 247, 136 (1982).Google Scholar
Sorensen, C.M., in Nanoscale Materials in Chemistry, edited by Klabunde, K.J. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001).Google Scholar
Gupta, P.K. and Huang, C.T, Life Sci. 44, 175 (1989).Google Scholar
Cote, L.J., Teja, A.S., Wilkinson, A., and Zhang, J., J. Mater. Res. 17, 2410 (2002).Google Scholar
Teja, A.S. and Holm, L.J., in Supercritical Fluid Technology in Materials Science and Engineering, edited by Sun, Y-P (Marcel Dekker, New York, 2002).Google Scholar
Adschiri, T., Hakuta, Y., and Arai, K., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 39, 4901 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matson, D.W., Lineban, J.C., Darab, J.G., Buehler, M.F., Phelps, M.R., and Neuenschwander, G.G., in Advanced Catalysts and Nanostructured Materials (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1996).Google Scholar
Adschiri, T., Kanazawa, K., and Arai, K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 75, 1019 (1992).Google Scholar
Hakuta, Y., Adschiri, T., Suzuki, T., Seino, K., and Arai, K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81, 2461 (1998).Google Scholar
Hakuta, Y., Adschiri, T., Hirakoso, H., and Arai, K., Fluid Phase Equilib. 158–160, 733 (1999).Google Scholar
Blesa, M.A. and Matijevic, E., Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 29, 173 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Söhnel, O. and Garside, J., Precipitation—Basic Principles and Industrial Applications (Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., Boston, MA, 1992).Google Scholar