Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T04:18:02.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biomimetic model of a sponge-spicular optical fiber—mechanical properties and structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

M. Sarikaya ,
H. Fong ,
N. Sunderland ,
B. D. Flinn ,
G. Mayer ,
A. Mescher  and
E. Gaino
M. Sarikaya*
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
H. Fong
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
N. Sunderland
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
B. D. Flinn
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
G. Mayer
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
A. Mescher
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
E. Gaino
Affiliation:
Instituto di Zoologia dell'Universita di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mial: sarikaya@u.washington.edu
Get access

Abstract

Nanomechanical properties, nanohardness and elastic modulus, of an Antarctic sponge Rosella racovitzea were determined by using a vertical indentation system attached to an atomic force microscope. The Rosella spicules, known to have optical waveguide properties, are 10–20 cm long with a circular cross section of diameter 200–600 μm. The spicules are composed of 2–10-μm-thick layers of siliceous material that has no detectable crystallinity. Measurements through the thickness of the spicules indicated uniform properties regardless of layering. Both the elastic modulus and nanohardness values of the spicules are about half of that of either fused silica or commercial glass optical fibers. The fracture strength and fracture energy of the spicules, determined by 3-point bend tests, are several times those of silica rods of similar diameter. These sponge spicules are highly flexible and tough possibly because of their layered structure and hydrated nature of the silica. The spicules offer bioinspired lessons for potential biomimetic design of optical fibers with long-term durability that could potentially be fabricated at room temperature in aqueous solutions.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 16 , Issue 5 , May 2001 , pp. 1420 - 1428
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Blyler, L.L. and DiMarcello, F.V., Optical Fibers, Drawing, and Coating, Encyclopedia of Technology Vol. 9 (Academic Press, New York, 1987) pp. 647–657.Google Scholar
2.Mathewson, M.J. and Yuce, D.H.H., SPIE 2290, 204 (1994).Google Scholar
3.Cattano-Vietti, R., Bavestrello, G., Cerrano, C., Sara, M., Nenatti, U., Glovine, M., and Giano, G., Nature 383, 397 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Rondinella, V.V., Matthewson, M.J., and Kurkjian, C.R., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 77, 73 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Mann, S., Science, 261, 1286 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Sarikaya, M., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 14183 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Simpson, T.L., Cell Biology of Sponges (Springer, New York, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Schultze, F.E., Rep. Scient. Results Challenger Zoology 21 (1887).Google Scholar
9.Arillo, A., Bavestrello, G., Burlando, G., and Sara, M., Mar. Biol. 117, 159 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Giano, E. and Sara, M., Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 108, 147 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Mescher, A., Fong, H., and Sarikaya, M. (unpublished data, 2000).Google Scholar
12.Rawson, E.G. and Murray, R.G., IEEE J., Quantum QE-9, 1114 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Ikada, M., Tadeda, M., and Yoshikiyo, H., Appl. Optics 14 (4), 814 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Doerner, M.F. and Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res. 1 (4), 601 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 4 (6), 1564 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Koehl, M.A.R., J. Exp. Biol. 98, 239 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Shimizu, K., Cha, J., Stucky, G.D., and Morse, D.E., Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 95, 6234 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Engineering Materials Handbook, Vol. 4: Ceramics and Glasses, Schneider, S. (Vol. Chair) (ASM International, Metals Park, OH, 1991).Google Scholar
19.Levi, C., Barton, J.L., Guilemet, C., Le-Bras, E., and Lehuede, P., J. Mater. Sc. Lett. 8, 337 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Clegg, W.J., Kendall, K., Alford, N.M., Button, T.W., and Birchall, J.D., Nature 347, 455 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Folsom, C.A., Zok, F.W., and Lang, F.F., in Proc. Ceramic Eng. and Sci., Vol. 13, No. 78 (American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 1992) pp. 467–474.Google Scholar
22.Nakayama, J., Japan. J. App. Phys. 3, 422 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Griffith, A.A., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A221, 163 (1920).Google Scholar
24.Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics, edited by Bradt, R.C. and Lang, F.F., Vols. 1 and 2 (Plenum, New York, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.He, M-Y. and Hutchinson, J.H., Int. J. Solids Str. 25, 1053 (1989).Google Scholar
26.Mechanical Design in Organisms, edited by Wainwright, S.A. et al. (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1976).Google Scholar