Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T10:36:16.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anodic dissolution of diamondlike carbon film-coated type 301 stainless steel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

C. Srividya
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials Processing and Department of Chemical Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York 13699
I. Moskowitz
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials Processing and Department of Chemical Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York 13699
S. V. Babu
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials Processing and Department of Chemical Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York 13699
Get access

Abstract

The resistance of thin diamondlike carbon (DLC) films to anodic breakdown in aqueous electrolytes was investigated using voltammetry. The films were less than 0.5 μm thick and were deposited on type 301 stainless steel substrates using plasma-assisted chemical vapor deposition (PACVD) from either methane, acetylene, or 1,3-butadiene precursors with argon or hydrogen as diluent. A 10 nm thick polysilicon (PS) film was plasma-deposited prior to DLC film deposition to improve adhesion. The electrolytes used for corrosion testing were mixtures of 0.1 M NaCl and 0.1 M Na2SO4 and 0.1 M HCl and 0.1 M Na2SO4 in de-ionized water. The measured anodic current was lowest for the films deposited from butadiene and highest for those deposited from methane. The anodic current also increased with an increase in the hydrogen content in the feed gas mixture. In addition, the DLC films deposited at higher gas flow rates offered more resistance to anodic dissolution than those deposited at lower gas flow rates. Annealing improved the film performance. There appears to be an optimum DLC film thickness which provides the maximum resistance to anodic dissolution. In the best case, the DLC films reduced the anodic dissolution of bare stainless steel by about 4 orders of magnitude in the passive region. Atomic force microscopy studies of coated and uncoated stainless steel showed that the DLC films conformed to the steel substrate surface and had no effect on surface roughness, while DLC coated silicon substrates showed no evidence of pores.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Angus, J. C., Thin Solid Films 142, 145 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Grill, A. and Meyerson, B.S., in Synthetic Diamond: Emerging CVD Science and Technology, edited by Spear, K.E. and Dismukes, J. P. (Wiley & Sons, New York, 1994).Google Scholar
3.Namura, K., Ota, H., Inanaga, K., and Ohmae, N., in Tribology and Mechanics of Magnetic Storage Media, edited by Bhushan, B. (Society of Tribologists and Lubrication Eng., Park Ridge, IL 1989), p. 81.Google Scholar
4.Miyoshi, K., Surf. Coatings Technol. 44, 799 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Jacob, W., Thin Solid Films 326, 1 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Kwiatek, S.E., Desai, V., Moran, P. J., and Natishan, P. M., J. Mater. Sci. 32, 3123 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Haruyama, S., Asari, M., and Tsuru, T., Proc. Electrochem. Soc. 87, 197 (1987).Google Scholar
8.Yeomans, S. R., Corrosion 50, 72 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Baumvol, I. J.R, Nuclear Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. B 85, 230 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Atik, M., De Lima Neto, P., Avaca, L. A., Aegerter, M.A., and Zarzycki, J., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 13, 1081 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Weamer, K.R. and McGarian, T., Proc. Automotive Coating Systems '94, Livonia, MI, 1994.Google Scholar
12.Jones, D.A., in Principles and Prevention of Corrosion, 2nd ed. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1996).Google Scholar
13.Liu, C., Leyland, A., Lyon, S., and Matthews, A., Surf. Coat. Technol. 76–77, 615 (1995).Google Scholar
14.Ronkainen, H., Ehrnstén, U., Zilliacus, R., Saarilahti, J., Mahiout, A., and Hannula, S-P., Thin Solid Films 220, 160 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Bellucci, F., Nicodemo, L., Monetta, T., Kloppers, M. J., and Latanision, R. M., Corrosion Sci. 33, 1203 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Aisenberg, S. and Stein, M., Proc. of the 15th International Technical Symp. of the Society of Photo and Electro-Optic Engineers (SPIE), August, 1981.Google Scholar
17.Sella, C., Lecoeur, J., Sampeur, Y., and Catania, P., Surf. Coat. Technol. 60, 577583 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Hirvonen, J-P., Koskinen, J., Anttila, A., and Lappalainen, R., Mater. Sci. Forum 52–53, 197 (1990).Google Scholar
19.Srividya, C. and Babu, S. V., Chem. Mater. 8, 25282533 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Srividya, C., Sunkara, M., and Babu, S. V., J. Mater. Res. 12, 20992103 (1997); J. Mater. Eng. Performance 6, 586–590 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Ulrich, R. K., Yi, D., Brown, W. D., and Ang, S. S., Thin Solid Films 209, 7379 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Ulrich, R. K., Yi, D., Brown, W.D., and Ang, S. S., Corrosion Sci. 33, 403412 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Visser, S., unpublished data.Google Scholar
24.David, M., Rasmussen, D.H., and Babu, S.V., AIChE J. 36, 871 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Singh, A., Lavigne, P., and Elboujdaini, M., Proc. Metallurgical Society of the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy, and Petroleum 25, 85 (1991).Google Scholar
26.David, M., Padiyath, R., and Babu, S. V., AIChE J. 37, 367 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Grill, A. and Patel, V., Diamond Related Mater. 2, 1519 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Grill, A. and Patel, V., Diamond Related Mater. 4, 6268 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Koskinen, J., Ehrnstén, U., Mahiout, A., Lahtinen, R., Hirvonen, J-P., and Hannula, S-P., Surf. Coat. Technol. 62, 356360 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar