Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T02:32:06.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of stability of a planar solid-liquid interface in a dilute binary alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

V. Laxmanan
Affiliation:
Metallurgy Department, General Motors Research Laboratories, Warren, Michigan 48090
Get access

Abstract

The question of stability of a planar solid-liquid interface in undercooled pure and alloy melts has been reconsidered without the restrictive assumption of no heat flow in the solid made in earlier works. The modified analysis indicates that provided the thermal gradient on the solid side of the interface, Gs, is positive, stability can be achieved in an undercooled alloy melt for growth rates R>Ra, whereas a recent analysis by Trivedi and Kurz, which assumes Gs = 0, suggests that stability is possible only if R>Ra + Rat. Here Ra is the familiar absolute stability limit of Mullins and Sekerka and Rat, is the absolute stability limit in an undercooled pure melt, as identified by Trivedi and Kurz. The absolute stability criterion for steady-state planar growth in an undercooled alloy melt is thus the same as derived earlier by Mullins and Sekerka for directional solidification. Relaxing the restrictive assumption of Gs = 0 also reveals that there is a regime of stability for low growth rates and low supercoolings. Stability is possible under these conditions if Gs>0, and the bath undercooling ΔTb < ΔTO + ΔTh/2, where ΔTO is the freezing range of the alloy and ΔTh is the hypercooling limit for the pure melt. For large supercoolings, Gs < 0, and the interface will be unstable with respect to large wavelength perturbations, even if R > Ra + Rat.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Mullins, W. W. and Sekerka, R. F., J. Appl. Phys. 35, 444451 (1964). See also R. F. Sekerka, J. Appl. Phys.36, 264–268 (1965) and R. F. Sekerka, in Crystal Growth, edited by H. S. Peiser, 691 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Coriell, S. R. and Sekerka, R. F., in Proc. of Rapid Solidification Processing: Principles and Technologies III, edited by Mehrabian, R. and Cohen, M. (Claitor Publishers, Baton Rouge, LA, 1980), pp. 3549.Google Scholar
3 Trivedi, R. and Kurz, W., Acta Metall. 34, 16631670 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Langer, J. S., Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 129 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Huang, S. C. and Glicksman, M. E., Acta Metall. 29, 701715 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Glicksman, M. E., Schaefer, R. J., and Ayers, J. D., Metall. Trans. A 7A, 17471759 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Laxmanan, V., Acta Metall. 37, 11091119 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Cahn, J. W., Coriell, S. R., and Boettinger, W. J., in Laser and Electron Beam Processing of Materials, edited by White, C. W. and Peercy, P. S. (Academic Press, New York, 1980), p. 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar