Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T13:54:29.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Planar oxidation of strained silicon substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2012

M-T. Lin ,
R. J. Jaccodine  and
T. J. Delph
M-T. Lin
Affiliation:
Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
R. J. Jaccodine
Affiliation:
Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
T. J. Delph
Affiliation:
Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
Get access

Abstract

We report here on a series of experiments in which relatively low levels of in-plane bending strain were applied to oxidizing silicon substrates. These were found to result in significant decreases in oxide thickness in the ultrathin oxide regime. Both tensile and compressive bending resulted in roughly the same degree of thickness retardation, although compressive bending typically led to somewhat thinner oxides than did tensile bending. An examination of the experimental data indicate that the principal effect seems to occur in the very early stages of oxidation, with only minor effects on subsequent oxide growth. We hypothesize that the observed oxide thickness retardation is related to straining of the underlying silicon lattice at the oxidation front.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , March 2001 , pp. 728 - 733
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Mihalyi, A., Jaccodine, R.J., and Delph, T.J., Appl. Phys. Let. 74, 1981 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Ravindra, N.M., Narayan, H., Fathy, D., Srivastava, J.K., and Irene, E.A., J. Mater. Res. 2, 216 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Carim, A.H. and Sinclair, R., J. Electrochem. Soc. 134, 741 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Kao, S-C. and Doremus, R.H., J. Electrochem. Soc. 141, 1832 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Hebert, K.J., Labayen, T., and Irene, E.A., in Physics and Chemistry of SiO2 and the Si-SiO2 Interface, edited by Massoud, H.Z., Helms, C.R., and Poindexter, E.H. (Plenum Press, NY, 1996).Google Scholar
6.Yasutake, K., Murakami, J., Umeno, M., and Kawabe, H., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 21, L288 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Deal, B.E. and Grove, A.S., J. Appl. Phys. 36, 3770 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Stoneham, A.M., Szymanski, M.A., and Shluger, A.L., in Structure and Electronic Properties of Ultrathin Dielectric Films on Silicon and Related Structures, edited by Buchanan, D.A., Edwards, A.H., von Bardeleben, H.J., and Hattori, T. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 592, Warrendale, PA, 2000), pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
9.Marcus, R.B. and Sheng, T.T., J. Electrochem. Soc. 129, 1278 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Kao, D-B., McVittie, J.P., Nix, W.D., and Sarasat, K.C., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices ED-34, 1008 (1987).Google Scholar
11.Delph, T.J. and Lin, M-T., J. Mater. Res. 14, 4508 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Sutardja, P. and Oldham, W.G., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices ED-36, 2328 (1989).Google Scholar
13.Rafferty, C.S., Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Elect. Eng., Stanford Univ. (1991).Google Scholar
14.Senez, V., Collard, D., Baccus, B., Brault, M., and Lebailly, J., J. Appl. Phys. 76, 3286 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Tersoff, J., Tu, Y., and Grinstein, G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2328 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar