Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T10:55:51.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fretting wear rate of sulphur deficient MoSx coatings based on dissipated energy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Xiaoling Zhang*
Affiliation:
Department MTM, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium, and State Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Xi'an Jiaotong University, 710049 Xi'an, People's Republic of China
W. Lauwerens
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Research, Limburgs Universitair Centrum, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium, and Center for Scientific and Research in Metal Manufacturing, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
L. Stals
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Research, Limburgs Universitair Centrum, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
Jiawen He
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Xi'an Jiaotong University, 710049 Xi'an, People's Republic of China
J-P. Celis
Affiliation:
Department Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author.
Get access

Abstract

The fretting wear of sulphur-deficient MoSx coatings with different crystallographic orientations has been investigated in ambient air of controlled relative humidity. The coefficient of friction and the wear rate of MoSx coatings sliding against corundum depend not only on fretting parameters like contact stress, fretting frequency, and relative humidity, but also strongly on the crystallographic orientation of the coatings. For randomly oriented MoSx coatings, the coefficient of friction and the wear rate increased significantly with increasing relative humidity. In contrast, basal-oriented MoSx coatings were less sensitive to relative humidity. The coefficient of friction of both types of MoSx coatings decreased on sliding against corundum with increasing contact stress and decreasing fretting frequency. A correlation between dissipated energy and wear volume is proposed. This approach allows detection in a simple way of differences in fretting wear resistance between random- and basal-oriented MoSx coatings tested in ambient air of different relative humidity.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Hilton, M.R. and Fleischauer, P.D., Surf. Coat. Technol. 54–55, 435 (1982).Google Scholar
2.Pope, L.E. and Panitz, J.K.G., Surf. Coat. Technol. 36, 341 (1988).Google Scholar
3.Nabot, J.Ph., Aubert, A., Gillet, R., and Renaux, Ph., Surf. Coat. Technol. 43/44, 629 (1990).Google Scholar
4.Stupp, B.C., Thin Solid Films 84, 257 (1981).Google Scholar
5.Spalvins, T., Thin solid Films 118, 375 (1984).Google Scholar
6.Renevier, N.M., Fox, V.C., Teer, D.G., and Hampshire, J., Surf. Coat. Technol. 127, 24 (2000).Google Scholar
7.Hilton, M.R., Bauser, R., Didziulis, S.V., Dugger, M.T., Keem, J.M., and Scholhamer, J., Surf. Coat. Technol. 53, 13 (1992).Google Scholar
8.Kobs, K., Dimigen, H., Hubsch, H., Tolle, H.J., Leutenecker, R., and Ryssel, H., Mater. Sci. Eng. 90, 281 (1987).Google Scholar
9.Jervis, T.R., Hirvonen, J-P., and Nastasi, M., J. Mater. Res. 6, 1350 (1991).Google Scholar
10.Weise, G., Teresiak, A., Bacher, I., Markschlager, P., and Kampschulte, G., Surf. Coat. Technol. 76–77, 382 (1995).Google Scholar
11.Wang, D-Y., Chang, C-L., Chen, Z-Y., and Ho, W-Y., Surf. Coat. Technol. 120–121, 629 (1999).Google Scholar
12.Simmonds, M.C., Simmonds, A., Van Swyenhoven, H., Pfluger, E., and Mikhailov, S., Surf. Coat. Technol. 108–109, 340 (1998).Google Scholar
13.Gilmore, R., Baker, M.A., Gibson, P.N., Gissler, X., Stoiber, M., Losbichler, P., and Mitterer, C., Surf. Coat. Technol. 108–109, 345 (1998).Google Scholar
14.Rechberger, J. and Brunner, P., Surf. Coat. Technol. 62, 393 (1993).Google Scholar
15.Wahl, K.J., Belin, M., and Singer, I.L., Wear 214, 212 (1998).Google Scholar
16.Celis, J.P., Stals, L., Vancoille, E., and Mohrbacher, H., Surf. Eng. 14, 205 (1998).Google Scholar
17.Mohrbacher, H., Blanpain, B., Celis, J-P., and Roos, J.R., Wear 180, 43 (1995).Google Scholar
18.Zhang, X.L., Vitchev, R., Lauwerens, W., Stals, L., He, J.W., and Celis, J-P., Thin Solid Films 396, 69 (2001).Google Scholar
19.Singer, I.L., Bolster, R.N., Wegand, J., Fayeulle, S., and Stupp, B.C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 995 (1990).Google Scholar
20.Grosseau-Poussard, J.L., Moine, P., and Brendle, M., Thin Solid Films 307, 163 (1997).Google Scholar
21.Lancaster, J.K., ASLE Trans. 18, 187 (1975).Google Scholar
22.Roberts, E.W., Thin Solid Films 181, 461 (1989).Google Scholar
23.Zhuang, D. and Liu, J., Tribology 15, 341 (1995).Google Scholar
24.Barry, H.F. and Binkelman, J.P., Lubric. Eng. 22, 139 (1966).Google Scholar
25.Huq, M.Z. and Celis, J.P., Wear 225–229, 53 (1999).Google Scholar
26.Xu, G., Zhou, Z., Liu, J., and Ma, X., Wear 225–259, 46 (1999).Google Scholar
27.Muller, C., Menoud, C., Maillat, M., and Hintermann, H.E., Surf. Coat. Technol. 36, 351 (1988).Google Scholar
28.Hilton, M.R., Bauer, R., and Fleischauer, P.D., Thin Solid Films 188, 219 (1990).Google Scholar
29.Christy, R.I. and Ludwig, H.R., Thin Solid Films 64, 223 (1979).Google Scholar
30.Spalvins, T., Thin Solid Films 90, 17 (1982).Google Scholar
31.Singer, I.L., Fayeulle, S., and Ehni, P.D., Wear 195, 7 (1996).Google Scholar