Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T12:18:18.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elastoplastic load–depth hysteresis in pyramidal indentation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

M. Sakai  and
Y. Nakano
M. Sakai*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Toyohashi University of Technology, Tempaku-cho, Toyohashi 441–8580, Japan
Y. Nakano
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Toyohashi University of Technology, Tempaku-cho, Toyohashi 441–8580, Japan
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author.msakai@tutms.tut.ac.jp
Get access

Abstract

Extensive indentation tests were conducted for nineteen different engineering materials ranging from brittle to ductile materials, and including hard ceramics, ductile metals, and a soft organic polymer. Three tetrahedral pyramid indenters with specific face angles β [shallow pyramid (β = 10°), Vickers (β = 22°), and sharp pyramid (β = 40°) indenters] were used. All the materials tested were subjected to the quadratic load P and penetration depth h relationship P = k1h2 on loading, and most of the tested materials to the quadratic unloading relationship of P = k2(h − hr)2 with the residual depth hr after a complete unload. To determine the contact area at peak indentation load, a specially designed depth-sensing instrument was constructed, on which the contact behavior during loading/unloading was examined by through thickness observation of transparent specimens. All the characteristic indentation parameters were investigated on the basis of simple elastoplastic model, and correlated well with the nondimensional strain E′ tan β/H, in which the elastic modulus E′ was a measure for elasticity, true hardness H was a measure for plasticity, and the inclined face angle β characterized the indenter. The ratio of the conventional Meyer hardness HM to the true hardness H of the materials tested ranged from 0.2 to 0.9 as a function of E′ tan β/H. The cavity model suggested that true hardness H is expressed by the yield stress Y through a constraint factor C as H = C · Y with C ≈ 5.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 17 , Issue 8 , August 2002 , pp. 2161 - 2173
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Tabor, D., Hardness of Metals (Clarendon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1951), Chaps. 4–7.Google Scholar
2.Johnson, K.L, Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1985), Chaps. 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Stilwell, N.A. and Tabor, D., Proc. Phys. Soc. London 78, 169 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Bulychev, S.I., Alekhim, V.P., Shorshorov, M.Kh., Ternovskii, A.P., and Shnyrev, G.D., Zavod. Lab. 41, 1137 (1975).Google Scholar
5.Lawn, B.R. and Howes, V.R., J. Mater. Sci. 16, 2745 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Loubet, J.L., Georges, J.M., and Meille, G., in Microindentation Techniques in Materials Science and Engineering edited by Blay, P.J. and Lawn, B.R. (ASTM STP889, Philadelphia, PA, 1986), p. 72.Google Scholar
7.Doerner, M.F. and Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res. 1, 601 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Pharr, G.M., Oliver, W.C., and Brotzen, F.R., J. Mater. Res. 7, 613 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Field, J.S. and Swain, M.V., J. Mater. Res. 8, 297 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Sakai, M., Acta Metall. Mater. 41, 1751 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.E. Söderlund and Rowcliffe, D.J., J. Hard Mater. 5, 149 (1994).Google Scholar
13.Cook, R.F. and Pharr, G.M., J. Hard Mater. 5, 179 (1994).Google Scholar
14.Hainsworth, S.V., Chandler, H.W., and Page, T.F., J. Mater. Res. 11, 1987 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Sakai, M., Shimizu, S., and Ishikawa, T., J. Mater. Res. 14, 1471 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Cheng, Y-T. and Cheng, C-M., Int. J. Solids Struct. 36, 1231 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Sakai, M., J. Mater. Res. 14, 3630 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Shimizu, S., Yanagimoto, T., and Sakai, M., J. Mater. Res. 14, 4075 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Giannakopoulos, A.E. and Suresh, S., Scripta Mater. 40, 1191 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Cheng, Y-T. and Cheng, C-M., Surf. Coat. Technol. 133–134, 417 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Sakai, M. and Shimizu, S., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 282, 236 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Chen, X. and Vlassak, J.J., J. Mater. Res. 16, 2974 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Malzbender, J. and With, G. de, J. Mater. Res. 17, 502 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.JIS standard B-7735, Vickers hardness test—Calibration of the reference blocks (Japanese Standard Association, 1997).Google Scholar
25.JIS standard G-4805, High carbon chromium bearing steels (Japanese Standard Association, Tokyo, Japan, 1999).Google Scholar
26.JIS standard H-3100, Copper and copper alloy sheets, plates, and strips (Japanese Standard Association, 1992).Google Scholar
27.ISO standard 426-1, Wrought copper-zinc alloys—Chemical composition and forms of wrought products—Part 1: Non-leaded special copper-zinc alloys (International Standardization Organization, 1983).Google Scholar
28.ISO/DIS standard 683-17, Heat-treated steels, alloy steels and free-cutting steels—Part 17: Ball and roller bearing steels (Inter-national Standardization Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1997).Google Scholar
29.King, R.B., Int. J. Solids Struct. 23, 1657 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Hay, J.C., Bolshakov, A., and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 14, 2296 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar