Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T11:12:15.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of alumina on densification of binary borosilicate glass composite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Jau-Ho Jean
Affiliation:
Alcoa Electronic Packaging, Inc., Alcoa Center, Pennsylvania 15069
Tapan K. Gupta
Affiliation:
Alcoa Electronic Packaging, Inc., Alcoa Center, Pennsylvania 15069
Get access

Abstract

The effect of alumina on densification of the binary borosilicate glass composite, containing low-softening borosilicate glass (BSG) and high-softening high silica (HSG) glass, has been investigated. It is found that with a small amount of alumina, 2-10 vol. %, present as a dopant in the binary glass mixture of BSG and HSG, both densification and densification rate are significantly reduced, but the activation energy of densification at a given densification is dramatically increased. However, no significant change in densification behavior with increasing alumina content from 2 to 10 vol. % is observed. These results are attributed to a chemical reaction taking place at the interface of alumina/BSG, forming a reaction layer adjacent to alumina. Since the composition of the reaction layer is known to be rich in aluminum and alkali ions and poor in silicon, the alkali ions content in BSG is continuously decreased during sintering. Accordingly, the resultant loss of alkali ions from BSG causes a rise in viscosity of BSG, thus slowing down the densification kinetics and increasing the activation energy of densification.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Jean, J-H. and Gupta, T. K., J. Mater. Res. 7, 3103 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Jean, J-H. and Gupta, T. K., J. Mater. Res. 9, 486 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Jean, J-H. and Lin, C. H., J. Mater. Sci. 24, 500 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4German, R. M., Liquid Phase Sintering (Plenum Press, New York, 1985), Chap. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Jean, J-H. and Gupta, T. K., J. Mater. Res. 8, 356 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Cannon, H. S. and Lenel, F. V., Proc. Plansee Semin., edited by Benesovsky, F. (Metallwerk Plansee, Reutte, 1953), p. 106.Google Scholar
7Jean, J-H. and Gupta, T. K., J. Mater. Res. 7, 2514 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Kingery, W. D., J. Appl. Phys. 30, 301 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Espe, W., Materials of High Vacuum Technology (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1968), Vol. 2, Chap. 10.Google Scholar
10Frischat, G. H., Ionic Diffusion in Oxide Glasses (Trans Tech, Bay Village, OH, 1975), p. 147.Google Scholar
11Frischat, G. H., Ionic Diffusion in Oxide Glasses (Trans Tech, Bay Village, OH, 1975), p. 138.Google Scholar
12Frischat, G. H., Ionic Diffusion in Oxide Glasses (Trans Tech, Bay Village, OH, 1975), p. 137.Google Scholar
13Doremus, R. H., Glass Science (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1973), Chap. 6.Google Scholar
14Kingery, W. D., Bowen, H. K., and Uhlmann, D. R., Introduction to Ceramics, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1976), Chap. 4.Google Scholar