Skip to main content Accessibility help

Translating models of organization: Can the Mittelstand move from Bavaria to Geelong?

  • Danielle M. Logue (a1), Walter P. Jarvis (a1), Stewart Clegg (a1) and Antoine Hermens (a1)


In this paper, we examine the increasing global attention being given to the German organizational form of the Mittelstand over the past decade. We do so, especially, in consideration of the construction of Australian analogues to the Mittelstand. Such translations have been posited as a solution to the current crisis facing Australian manufacturing. Translation out of context always poses problems: can a specifically national form of organization, such as the German Mittelstand, be something that can, potentially, be translated to other nations and industrial contexts? The Australian case offers an empirical setting in which to explore understandings of transnational translation of management innovations. Our findings demonstrate how globally theorized models subject to translation align abstract value orientations with local templates. Our discussion focuses on the translation of a Bavarian model of organization into very different locations, such as Geelong, Australia.


Corresponding author

Corresponding author:


Hide All
Ansari, S. M., Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. (2010). Made to fit: How practices vary as they diffuse. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 6792.
Atkins, R. (2012). Germany: The miraculous machine. Financial Times. Retrieved 19 April 2012 from
Australian Business Foundation (ABF). (2011). Manufacturing future. Australia: Australian Business Foundation and NSW Business Chamber.
Australian Business Foundation and NSW Chamber of Business (2011). Manufacturing Futures. April 2011. Retrieved from
Avery, G. & Bergsteiner, H. (2010). Honeybees and Locusts: The business case for sustainable leadership. Sydney: Allen & Unwinn.
Baum, J. A., & Powell, W. W. (1995). Cultivating an institutional ecology of organizations: Comment on Hannan, Carroll, Dundon, and Torres. American Sociological Review, 60(4), 529538.
Bauman, Z. (1988). Freedom. London: Routledge.
Bendix, R. (1956). Work and authority in industry: Ideologies of management in the course of industrialisation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Berkeley.
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611639.
Berghoff, H. (2006). The end of family business? The Mittelstand and German capitalism in transition, 1949-2000. Business History Review, 80, 263295.
Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33, 825845.
Blackbourn, D. (2003). History of Germany, 1780-1918: The long nineteenth century. Oxford: Blackwell.
Blasco, M., & Zølner, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Mexico and France: Exploring the role of normative institutions. Business and Society, 49(2), 216251.
Bryant, C. (2012). A model that everyone wants. Financial Times. Retrieved 6 August 2012 from
Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional change and globalization: Problems and prospects. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Chandler, J. (2012). New Polish on the factory floor. The Age, March 16. Retrieved from
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 125.
Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). Travel of ideas. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 1348). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Czarniawska, B., & Sevon, G. (1996). Translating organizational change. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Czarniawska, B., & Sevon, G. (Eds.) (2005). Global ideas: How ideas, objects, and practices travel in the global economy. Copenhagen: Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press.
Davis, G., Diekmann, K., & Tinsley, C. (1994). The decline of the conglomerate firm in the 1980s: The deinstitutionalization of an organizational form. American Sociological Review, 59(4), 547570.
Djelic, M.-L. (1998). Exporting the American model: The post-war transformation of European business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Djelic, M. L. (2008). Sociological studies of diffusion: Is history relevant? Socio-Economic Review, 6(3), 538557.
Djelic, M.-L., & Quack, S. (Eds.) (2003). Globalisation and institutions: Redefining the rules of the economic game. UK: Edward Elgar.
Djelic, M.-L., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (Eds.) (2006). Transnational governance: Institutional dynamics of regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drori, G., Meyer, J. W., & Hwang, H. (Eds.) (2006). Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change. USA: Oxford University Press.
Drori, G., Höllerer, M., & Walgenbach, P. (2014). Global themes and local variations in organization and management. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
Eberle, E. (2002). Dignity and liberty: Constitutional visions in Germany and the United States. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
Eberle, E. (2008). Equality in Germany and the United States. San Diego International Law Journal, 10, 63120.
Fioretos, O. (2011). Creative reconstructions: Multilateralism and European varieties of capitalism after 1950. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Gioia, D. A., Price, K. N., Hamilton, A. L., & Thomas, J. B. (2010). Forging an identity: An insider-outsider study of processes involved in the formation of organizational identity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 146.
Gittens, R. (2012). For true productivity gains, co-operate don’t fight. Sydney Morning Herald, August 8. Retrieved 19 April 2012 from
Glasman, M. (1996). Unnecessary suffering: Managing markets utopia. London: Verso.
Glossner, C. (2010). The making of the German post-war economy: Political communication and public reception of the social market economy after World War Two. London: Tauris.
Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 5880.
Guillen, M. (1994). Models of management. USA: University of Chicago Press.
Hamilton, G., & Biggart, N. (1988). Market, culture, and authority: A comparative analysis of management and organization in the far East. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement): Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure), S52S94.
Höllerer, M. A. (2013). From taken-for-granted to explicit commitment: The rise of CSR in a corporatist country. Journal of Management Studies, 50(4), 573606.
James, D. (2012). For want of a nail. Business Review Weekly. Retrieved 29 November 2012 from
Jarvis, W. P., & Logue, D. M. (2012). Is the Toyota way the only way? The Conversation. Retrieved 3 May 2012 from
Jones, D. (2012). Masters of the universe: Hayek, Friedman, and the birth of neoliberal politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jones, L. P., Sakong, I., & Jones, L. (1980). Government, business, and entrepreneurship in economic development: The Korean case. Cambridge, MA: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University.
Judt, T. (2005). Postwar: A history of Europe since 1945. Random House.
Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, M. T. (2008). Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 9941006.
Locke, R. (1996). The collapse of the American management mystique. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Locke, R., & Spender, J. C. (2011). Confronting managerialism: How the business elite and their schools threw our lives out of balance. London: Zed.
Logue, D. M. (2014). Adoption and abandonment: Global diffusion and local variation in university top management teams. In G. Drori, M. Höllerer & P. Walgenbach (Eds.), Global themes and local variations in organization and management (pp. 175188). New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
Lounsbury, M. (2007). A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalising of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 289307.
Lounsbury, M., & Crumley, E. T. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28(7), 9931012.
Marceau, J. (1997). The high road or the low road: Alternatives for Australia’s future. Sydney: Australian Business Foundation.
Marsh, P. (2012). China’s industries in Mittelstand-off. Financial Times. Retrieved 14 November 2012 from
Mazorol, T. (2012). The missing middle: What could Australia learn from Germany. The Conversation. Retrieved 19 May 2012 from
Meyer, R. E. (2014). ‘Re-localization’ as micro-mobilization of consent and legitimacy. In G. Drori, M. Höllerer & P. Walgenbach (Eds.), Global themes and local variations in organization and management (pp. 7989). New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
Meyer, R. E., & Höllerer, M. A. (2010). Meaning structures in a contested issue field: A topographic map of shareholder value in Austria. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 12411262.
Munir, K. A., & Phillips, N. (2005). The birth of the ‘kodak moment’: Institutional entrepreneurship and the adoption of new technologies. Organization Studies, 26(11), 16651687.
Nigam, A., & Occasio, W. (2010). Event attention, environmental sensemaking, and change in institutional logics: An inductive analysis of the effects of public attention to Clinton’s health care reform initiative. Organisation Science, 21(4), 823841.
Paster, T. (2012). The role of business in the development of the welfare state and labor markets in Germany: Containing social reforms. London: Routledge.
Powell, W., Gammal, D., & Simard, C. (2005). Close encounters: The circulation and reception of managerial practices in the San Francisco bay area nonprofit community. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevon (Eds.), Global ideas (pp. 233258). Copenhagen: Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press.
Prime Minister’s Manufacturing Task Force (2012). Report of Non-Government Members “Smarter Manufacturing for a Smarter Australia”. 16 August 2012. Retrieved from:
Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. The American Journal of Sociology, 108(4), 795843.
Reay, T. & Hinings, C. B. (2005). The recomposition of an organizational field: Health care in Alberta. Organization Studies, 26(3), 351384.
Riege, A., & Zulpo, M. (2007). Knowledge transfer process cycle: Between factory floor and middle management. Australian Journal of Management, 32(2), 293314.
Sahlin-Andersson, K. (1996). Imitating by editing success: The construction of organizational fields. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevon (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 6992). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Sahlin-Andersson, K., & Engwall, L. (Eds.) (2002). The expansion of management knowledge: Carriers, flows, and sources. USA: Stanford University Press.
Sandrock, O., & du Plessis, J. (2012). The German system of supervisory codetermination by employees. In J. du Plessis et al. (Eds.), German corporate governance in international and European context (2nd ed.). London: Springer.
Servan-Schreiber, J. (1967). The American challenge. New York, NY: Scribner.
Silvia, S. (2013). Holding the shop together: German industrial relations in the postwar era. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Simon, H. (1996). Hidden champions. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
Strang, D., & Meyer, J. W. (1993). Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22(4), 487511.
Strang, D., & Soule, S. A. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 265290.
Stout, L. (2012). The shareholder myth: how putting shareholders first harms investors, corporations, and the public. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2005), 3567.
Svejenova, S., Mazza, C., & Planellas, M. (2007). Cooking up change in haute cuisine: Ferran Adrià as an institutional entrepreneur. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(5), 539561.
Taylor, L. (2003). Facing up to change. Australian Financial Review, January 18. Retrieved from
The Economist (2012). Why doesn’t France have a Mittelstand? Envy of Germany’s medium-sized firms sparks a desire to emulate them. Published 20 October 2012, accessed at’s-medium-sized-family-firms-sparks-desire-emulate-them.
Tipler, C. (2012). German elixir for our Dutch disease. Business Spectator. Retrieved 29 February 2012 from
Tolbert, P., & Zucker, L. (1996). Institutionalization of institutional theory. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organizational studies. London: Sage, pp. 175190.
Van Maanen, J. (1979). Reclaiming qualitative methods for organizational research: A preface. Administrative Science Quarterly, 520526.
Venohr, B., & Meyer, K. (2007). The German miracle keeps running: How Germany’s hidden champions stay ahead in the global economy, Working Paper No. 30, Institute of Management, Berlin School of Economics, Berlin.
Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission, Victorian Government, Australia (2011). Victorian manufacturing: Meeting the Challenges. June 2011. Retrieved from
Walker, M. (1971/1998). German home towns: Community, state, and general estate. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. pp. 16481871.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Zilber, T. B. (2006). The work of the symbolic in institutional processes: Translations of rational myths in Israeli high tech. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 281303.



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed