Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:43:29.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationship between the board of directors and firm performance in private family firms: A test of the demographic versus behavioral approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2015

Rodrigo Basco  and
Wim Voordeckers
Rodrigo Basco*
Affiliation:
Witten Institute for Family Business, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
Wim Voordeckers
Affiliation:
KIZOK Research Centre, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
*
Corresponding author: bascorodrigo@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research on corporate governance has attempted to investigate the added value of boards of directors through the lenses of both demographic and behavioral approaches. However, investigations into these two approaches, and the subsequent implications for firm performance, have thus far been mainly decoupled from one another. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to put both approaches to the test in the family business context. Using a sample of 567 Spanish family firms, we find that although both approaches can explain the performance of family firms, the behavioral approach explains a much higher proportion of the variation in the firm’s performance. Furthermore, our findings support our hypotheses that the relationship between the proportion of outside directors and firm performance follows an inverted U-shape in private family firms, and that both business-oriented and family-oriented board role performance are positively related with firm performance.

Keywords

board of directorsfamily businessdemographic approachbehavioral approachboard role performance
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , July 2015 , pp. 411 - 435
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2007). A theory of friendly boards. The Journal of Finance, 62(1), 217–250.Google Scholar
Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 58–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 209–237.Google Scholar
Arosa, B., Iturralde, T., & Maseda, A. (2010). Outsiders on the board of directors and firm performance: Evidence from Spanish non-listed family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(4), 236–245.Google Scholar
Arregle, J. L., Hitt, M. A., Sirmon, D. G., & Very, P. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagozzi, R. (2011). Measurement and meaning in information systems and organizational research: Methodological and philosophical foundations. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 261–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bammens, Y., Voordeckers, W., & Van Gils, A. (2008). Boards of directors in family firms: A generational perspective. Small Business Economics, 31(2), 163–180.Google Scholar
Bammens, Y., Voordeckers, W., & Van Gils, A. (2011). Boards of directors in family businesses: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(2), 134–152.Google Scholar
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.Google Scholar
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.Google Scholar
Basco, R. (2010). Tipo de orientación y prácticas de dirección y gobierno. Un estudio aplicado a las empresas familiares españolas. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 19(2), 129–144.Google Scholar
Basco, R., & Pérez Rodriguez, M. J. (2009). Studying the family enterprise holistically evidence for integrated family and business systems. Family Business Review, 22(1), 82–95.Google Scholar
Basco, R., & Pérez Rodríguez, M. J. (2011). Ideal types of family business management: Horizontal fit between family and business decisions and the relationship with family business performance. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2(3), 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (1998). The economics of small business finance: The roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22(6–8), 613–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gόmez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279.Google Scholar
Bettinelli, C. (2011). Boards of directors in family firms: An exploratory study of structure and group process. Family Business Review, 24(2), 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagat, S., & Black, B. S. (2002). The non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance. Journal of Corporation Law, 27, 231–273.Google Scholar
Brundin, E., Florin Samuelsson, E., & Melin, L. (2014). Family ownership logic: Framing the core characteristics of family businesses. Journal of Management & Organization, 20(1), 6–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgstahler, D. C., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2006). The importance of reporting incentives: Earnings management in European private and public firms. The Accounting Review, 81(5), 983–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, M. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Litz, R. A. (2004). Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship-Theory and Practice, 28(4), 335–354.Google Scholar
Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 555–575.Google Scholar
Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behaviour. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claver, E., Rienda, L., & Quer, D. (2009). Family firms’ international commitment the influence of family-related factors. Family Business Review, 22(2), 125–135.Google Scholar
Corbetta, G., & Salvato, C. (2004). The board of directors in family firms: One size fits all? Family Business Review, 17(2), 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbetta, G., & Tomaselli, S. (1996). Boards of directors in Italian family businesses. Family Business Review, 9(4), 403–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, J. B., Dibrell, C., & Davis, P. S. (2008). Leveraging family-based brand identity to enhance firm competitiveness and performance in family businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(3), 351–371.Google Scholar
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioural theory of the firm. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A. (2003). Introduction to special topic forum corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371–382.Google Scholar
Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269–290.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.Google Scholar
Dess, G. G., & Robinson, R. B. (1984). Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal, 5(3), 265–273.Google Scholar
Eddleston, K. A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 545–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.Google Scholar
Fiegener, M. K., Brown, B. M., Dreux, D. R., & Dennis, W. J. (2000). The adoption of outside boards by small private US firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12(4), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505.Google Scholar
Ford, R. H. (1988). Outside directors and the privately-owned firm: Are they necessary? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13(1), 49–57.Google Scholar
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 77–90.Google Scholar
Gabrielsson, J. (2007). Boards of directors and entrepreneurial posture in medium-size companies – Putting the board demography approach to a test. International Small Business Journal, 25(5), 511–537.Google Scholar
Gabrielsson, J., & Huse, C. (2005). Outside directors in SME board: A call for theoretical reflections. Corporate Board: Roles, Duties & Composition, 1(1), 28–37.Google Scholar
Gabrielsson, J., & Huse, M. (2004). Context, behavior, and evolution. International Studies of Management & Organization, 34(2), 11–36.Google Scholar
Gabrielsson, J., & Winlund, H. (2000). Boards of directors in small and medium-sized industrial firms: Examining the effects of the board's working style on board task performance. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12(4), 311–330.Google Scholar
Goel, S., Voordeckers, W., van Gils, A., & van den Heuvel, J. (2012). CEO’s empathy and salience of socioemotional wealth in family SMEs – The moderating role of external directors. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(3–4), 111–134.Google Scholar
Gόmez-Mejia, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653–707.Google Scholar
Gόmez-Mejia, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Nunez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1984). Business unit strategy, managerial characteristics, and business unit effectiveness at strategy implementation. The Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 25–41.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1986). Resource sharing among SBUs: Strategic antecedents and administrative implications. The Academy of Management Journal, 29(4), 695–714.Google Scholar
Gupta, V., & Levenburg, N. (2010). A thematic analysis of cultural variations in family businesses: The CASE project. Family Business Review, 23(2), 155–169.Google Scholar
Gutierrez, I., & Surroca, J. (2014). Revisiting corporate governance through the lens of the Spanish evidence. Journal of Management & Governance, 18 (4), 989–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habbershon, T. G., & Williams, M. L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.Google Scholar
Herath, T., & Rao, H. R. (2009). Encouraging information security behaviors in organizations: Role of penalties, pressures and perceived effectiveness. Decision Support Systems, 47(2), 154–165.Google Scholar
Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 235–255.Google Scholar
Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396.Google Scholar
Hoffman, J., Hoelscher, M., & Sorenson, R. (2006). Achieving sustained competitive advantage: A family capital theory. Family Business Review, 19(2), 135–145.Google Scholar
Huse, M. (2000). Boards of directors in SMEs: A review and research agenda. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12(4), 271–290.Google Scholar
Huse, M. (2005). Accountability and creating accountability: A framework for exploring behavioural perspectives of corporate governance. British Journal of Management, 16, S65–S79.Google Scholar
Igartua Arregui, F., & García, Á.-V. (2006). Principios de buen gobierno corporativo para empresas no cotizadas. Madrid: Instituto de Consejeros-Administradores.Google Scholar
Jaskiewicz, P., & Klein, S. (2007). The impact of goal alignment on board composition and board size in family businesses. Journal of Business Research, 60(10), 1080–1089.Google Scholar
Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256–282.Google Scholar
Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238–251.Google Scholar
Johannisson, B., & Huse, M. (2000). Recruiting outside board members in the small family business: An ideological challenge. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12(4), 353–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1996). Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22(3), 409–438.Google Scholar
Jones, C. D., Makri, M., & Gόmez-Mejia, L. R. (2008). Affiliate directors and perceived risk bearing in publicly traded, family-controlled firms: The case of diversification. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 1007–1026.Google Scholar
Kaczmarek, S., Kimino, S., & Pye, A. (2012). Board task-related faultlines and firm performance: A decade of evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(4), 337–351.Google Scholar
Kellermanns, F. W., Eddleston, K. A., Barnett, T., & Pearson, A. (2008). An exploratory study of family member characteristics and involvement: Effects on entrepreneurial behavior in the family firm. Family Business Review, 21(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Kellermanns, F. W., Eddleston, K. A., & Zellweger, T. M. (2012). Extending the socioemotional wealth perspective: A look at the dark side. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1175–1182.Google Scholar
Klein, P., Shapiro, D., & Young, J. (2005). Corporate governance, family ownership and firm value: The Canadian evidence. Corporate Governance – An International Review, 13(6), 769–784.Google Scholar
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Kotlar, J., & De Massis, A. (2012). Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family-centered goals. Paper presented at the Theories of Family Enterprise Conference Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. May 11–13. Retrieved from http://www.business.ualberta.ca/en/Conferences/TheoriesOfFamilyEnterprise.Google Scholar
Lai, J., Chen, L., & Chen, I. (2014). The value of outside director experience to firm strategies: Evidence from joint ventures. Journal of Management & Organization, 20(3), 387–409.Google Scholar
Lane, S., Astrachan, J., Keyt, A., & McMillan, K. (2006). Guidelines for family business boards of directors. Family Business Review, 19(2), 147–167.Google Scholar
Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325–340.Google Scholar
Lester, R. H., & Cannella, A. A. (2006). Interorganizational familiness: How family firms use interlocking directorates to build community-level social capital. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 755–775.Google Scholar
Li, J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. The Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 794–813.Google Scholar
Linck, J., Netter, J., & Yang, T. (2008). The determinants of board structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 87, 308–328.Google Scholar
Lind, J. T., & Mehlum, H. (2010). With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-Shaped relationship*. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 72(1), 109–118.Google Scholar
Ling, Y., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2010). The effect of family firm specific sources of TMT diversity: The moderating role of information exchange frequency. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 232–344.Google Scholar
Lubatkin, M. H., Schulze, W. S., Ling, Y., & Dino, R. N. (2005). The effects of parental altruism on the governance of family-managed firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(3), 313–330.Google Scholar
Machold, S., Huse, M., Minichilli, A., & Nordqvist, M. (2011). Board leadership and strategy involvement in small firms: A team production approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(4), 368–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahto, R. V., Davis, P. S., Pearce, J. A. II, & Robinson, R. B. Jr. (2010). Satisfaction with firm performance in family businesses. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(5), 985–1001.Google Scholar
Mathieu, J. E., DeShon, R. P., & Bergh, D. D. (2008). Mediational inferences in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 203–223.Google Scholar
Mazzola, P., Sciascia, S., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2013). Non-linear effects of family sources of power on performance. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 568–574.Google Scholar
Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Scholnick, B. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 51–78.Google Scholar
Minichilli, A., Corbetta, G., & MacMillan, I. C. (2010). Top management teams in family-controlled companies: ‘Familiness’, ‘Faultlines’, and their impact on financial performance. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 205–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minichilli, A., Zattoni, A., Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2012). Board task performance: An exploration of micro- and macro-level determinants of board effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 193–215.Google Scholar
Minichilli, A., Zattoni, A., & Zona, F. (2009). Making boards effective: An empirical examination of board task performance. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 55–74.Google Scholar
Molly, V., Laveren, E., & Jorissen, A. (2012). Intergenerational differences in family firms: Impact on capital structure and growth behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 703–725.Google Scholar
Morck, R. K., & Yeung, B. (2003). Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 367–382.Google Scholar
Murray, M. (2006). Avoiding invalid instruments and coping with weak instruments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(4), 111–132.Google Scholar
Mustakallio, M., Autio, E., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). Relational and contractual governance in family firms: Effects on strategic decision making. Family Business Review, 15(3), 205–222.Google Scholar
Neubauer, F., & Alden, G. L. (1998). The family business in governance for susainability. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ng, W., & Roberts, J. (2007). ‘Helping the family’: The mediating role of outside directors in ethnic Chinese family firms. Human Relations, 60(2), 285–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Núñez-Cacho Utrilla, P., & Grande Torraleja, F. A. (2013). The importance of mentoring and coaching for family businesses. Journal of Management & Organization, 19(4), 386–404.Google Scholar
Payne, G. T., Benson, G. S., & Finegold, D. L. (2009). Corporate board attributes, team effectiveness and financial performance. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 704–731.Google Scholar
Pérez Rodríguez, M. J., & Basco, R. (2011). The cognitive legitimacy of the family business field. Family Business Review, 24(4), 322–342.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, A. M. (1992). On studying managerial elites. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S2), 163–182.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. (1983). Organizational demography. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependecy perspective. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.Google Scholar
Pugliese, A., & Wenstøp, P. Z. (2007). Board members’ contribution to strategic decision-making in small firms. Journal of Management and Governance, 11(4), 383–404.Google Scholar
Quintana, J. (2012). Guía practica para el buen gobierno de las empresas familiares. Barcelona: Instituto de la Empresa Familiar España.Google Scholar
Richard, P. J., Devinney, T. M., Yip, G. S., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35(3), 718–804.Google Scholar
Sacristan-Navarro, M., & Gómez Ansón, S. (2009). Do family shape corporate governance structures? Journal of Management & Organization, 15(3), 327–345.Google Scholar
Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2003a). Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 179–194.Google Scholar
Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2003b). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 473–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99–116.Google Scholar
Schwartz, M. A., & Barnes, L. B. (1991). Outside boards and family businesses: Another look. Family Business Review, 4(3), 269–285.Google Scholar
Shanker, M. C., & Astrachan, J. H. (1996). Myths and realities: Family businesses’ contribution to the US Economy – a framework for assessing family business statistics. Family Business Review, 9(2), 107–123.Google Scholar
Siggelkow, N., & Rivkin, J. W. (2009). Hiding the evidence of valid theories: How coupled search processes obscure performance differences among organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(4), 602–634.Google Scholar
Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 339–358.Google Scholar
Steijvers, T., & Voordeckers, W. (2009). Private family ownership and the agency costs of debt. Family Business Review, 22(4), 333–346.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. (2009). Attitudes and expectations of shareholders: The case of the multi-generation family business. Journal of Management & Organization, 15(3), 346–362.Google Scholar
Tuggle, C. S., Schnatterly, K., & Johnson, R. A. (2010). Attention patterns in the boardroom: How board composition and processes affect discussion of entrepreneurial issues. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 550–571.Google Scholar
Van den Berghe, L. A. A., & Carchon, S. (2002). Corporate governance practices in Flemish family businesses. Corporate Governance – An International Review, 10(3), 225–245.Google Scholar
Van den Heuvel, J., Van Gils, A., & Voordeckers, W. (2006). Board roles in small and medium-sized family businesses: Performance and importance. Corporate Governance – An International Review, 14(5), 467–485.Google Scholar
Van Ees, H., Gabrielsson, J., & Huse, M. (2009). Toward a behavioral theory of boards and corporate governance. Corporate Governance-an International Review, 17(3), 307–319.Google Scholar
Vandewaerde, M., Voordeckers, W., Lambrechts, F., & Bammens, Y. (2011). Board team leadership revisited: A conceptual model of shared leadership in the boardroom. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 403–420.Google Scholar
Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1987). Measurement of business economic performance: An examination of method convergence. Journal of Management, 13(1), 109–122.Google Scholar
Voordeckers, W., Van Gils, A., & Van den Heuvel, J. (2007). Board composition in small and medium-sized family firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 45(1), 137–156.Google Scholar
Wallace, J. C., Little, L. M., Hill, A. D., & Ridge, J. W. (2010). CEO regulatory foci, environmental dynamism, and small firm performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(4), 580–604.Google Scholar
Ward, J. L. (1988). The active board with outside directors and the family firm. Family Business Review, 1(3), 223–229.Google Scholar
Ward, J. L., & Handy, J. L. (1988). A survey of board practices. Family Business Review, 1(3), 289–308.Google Scholar
Westhead, P., & Howorth, C. (2006). Ownership and management issues associated with family firm performance and company objectives. Family Business Review, 19(4), 301–316.Google Scholar
Westphal, J. D. (1999). Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-Board social ties. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 7–24.Google Scholar
Whetten, D. A. (2009). An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management and Organization Review, 5(1), 29–55.Google Scholar
Williams, K. Y., & O`Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demographic and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cumming (Eds.), Research in organization behavioral (Vol. 20, pp. 77–140). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, J. M. (2012). Introductory Econometrics. A modern approach (5th ed.). Southwestern Ohio: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291.Google Scholar
Zattoni, A., Gnan, L., & Huse, M. (2013). Does family involvement influence firm performance? Exploring the mediating effects of board processes and tasks. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1214–1243.Google Scholar
Zellweger, T. M., Eddleston, K. A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2010). Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(1), 54–63.Google Scholar
Zellweger, T. M., & Nason, R. S. (2008). A stakeholder perspective on family firm performance. Family Business Review, 21(3), 203–216.Google Scholar
Zhang, P., Voordeckers, W., Gabrielsson, J., & Huse, M. (2009). From value assembler to value creator – An integrative perspective on board information. In S. Young (Ed.), Contemporary issues in international corporate governance (pp. 43–57). Melbourne: Tilde University Press.Google Scholar
Zona, F., & Zattoni, A. (2007). Beyond the black box of demography: Board processes and task effectiveness within Italian firms. Corporate Governance – An International Review, 15(5), 852–864.Google Scholar