Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T05:18:20.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does strategic planning help firms translate slack resources into better performance?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2018

Jinyu Guo ,
Bo Zhou ,
Haili Zhang ,
Chunjia Hu  and
Michael Song
Jinyu Guo
Affiliation:
School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
Bo Zhou
Affiliation:
School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
Haili Zhang*
Affiliation:
Institute of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Xi’an Technological University, Xi’an, China
Chunjia Hu
Affiliation:
School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
Michael Song
Affiliation:
School of Economics and Management, Xi’an Technological University, Xi’an City, Shannxi, China
*
Corresponding author: phoebe520@126.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Is organizational slack good or bad for firm performance? Research addressing this question has obtained mixed results. Such studies have focused mainly on the impact of environmental conditions on the slack–performance relationship. In this study, instead of focusing on the uncontrollable external environment, we consider actions determined by firms internally, in particular strategic planning. Using data from 183 US firms, we explore the connection between organizational slack and firm performance with different levels of strategic planning. The results suggest that at low levels of strategic planning the slack–performance relationship is linear, while at high levels of strategic planning this relationship is inverse U shaped. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.

Keywords

organizational slackfirm performancestrategic planning
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , July 2020 , pp. 395 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Arend, R. J., Zhao, Y. L., Song, M., & Im, S. (2017). Strategic planning as a complex and enabling managerial tool. Strategic Management Journal, 38(8), 1741–1752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, J. S. (1982). The value of formal planning for strategic decisions: Review of empirical research. Strategic Management Journal, 3(July/September), 197–211.Google Scholar
Arthurs, J. D., Hoskisson, R. E., Busenitz, L. W., & Johnson, R. A. (2008). Managerial agents watching other agents: Multiple agency conflicts regarding underpricing in IPO firms. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability—Rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azadegan, A., Patel, P. C., & Parida, V. (2013). Operational slack and venture survival. Production and Operations Management, 22(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. (2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 676–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, S. W., Shepherd, D. A., & Wiklund, J. (2011). The importance of slack for new organizations facing ‘tough’ environments. Journal of Management Studies, 48(5), 1071–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromiley, P. (1991). Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 37–59.Google Scholar
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 343–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, M. F., Chiaburu, D. S., Shapiro, D. L., & Li, N. (2015). Revisiting how and when perceived organizational support enhances taking charge an inverted U-shaped perspective. Journal of Management, 41(7), 1805–1826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. London, UK: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cheng, C.-F., Chang, M.-L., & Li, C.-S. (2013). Configural paths to successful product innovation. Journal of Business Research, 66(12), 2561–2573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, F., Lohrke, F. T., Fornaciari, C. J., & Turner, R. A. Jr (2004). Slack resources and firm performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 565–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, G. F., & Stout, S. K. (1992). Organization theory and the market for corporate control: A dynamic analysis of the characteristics of large takeover targets, 1980–1990. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 605–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys. New York, NY: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 484–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, G. (2005). Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 661–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2005). The impact of extent of telecommuting on job satisfaction: Resolving inconsistent findings. Journal of Management, 31(2), 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, A. (1997). The effect of project and process characteristics on product development cycle time. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(February), 24–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haans, R. F., Pieters, C., & He, Z. L. (2015). Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U‐and inverted U‐shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 1177–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J. S., & Coombs, J. E. (2012). The moderating effects from corporate governance characteristics on the relationship between available slack and community-based firm performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(4), 409–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hekman, D. R., Bigley, G. A., Steensma, H. K., & Hereford, J. F. (2009). Combined effects of organizational and professional identification on the reciprocity dynamic for professional employees. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 506–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendricks, K. B., & Singhal, V. R. (2009). Demand-supply mismatches and stock market reaction: Evidence from excess inventory announcements. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 11(3), 509–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latham, S. F., & Braun, M. (2009). Managerial risk, innovation, and organizational decline. Journal of Management, 35(2), 258–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, L. H., & Fang, S. C. (2013). Problematic search, slack search and institutional logic in corporate R&D strategy: An empirical analysis of Taiwanese electronics firms. Journal of Management & Organization, 19(6), 659–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlin, D., & Geiger, S. W. (2015). A reexamination of the organizational slack and innovation relationship. Journal of Business Research, 68(12), 2683–2690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menon, A., Bharadwaj, S. G., Adidam, P. T., & Edison, S. W. (1999). Antecedents and consequences of marketing strategy making. Journal of Marketing, 63(April), 18–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, C. C., & Cardinal, L. B. (1994). Strategic planning and firm performance: A synthesis of more than two decades of research. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1649–1665.Google Scholar
Miner, A. S., Bassoff, P., & Moorman, C. (2001). Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 304–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1990). The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(3), 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montoya-Weiss, M., & Calantone, R. (1994). Determinants of new product performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(November), 397–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorman, C., & Miner, A. S. (1998). The convergence of planning and execution: Improvisation in new product development. Journal of Marketing, 62(July), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1245–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’ Shannassy, T. (2010). Board and CEO practice in modem strategy-making: How is strategy developed, who is the boss and in what circumstances? Journal of Management & Organization, 16(2), 280–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’ Shannassy, T. F. (2016). Strategic intent: The literature, the construct and its role in predicting organization performance. Journal of Management and Organization, 22(5), 583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salomo, S., Weise, J., & Gemünden, H. G. (2007). NPD planning activities and innovation performance: The mediating role of process management and the moderating effect of product innovativeness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(4), 285–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1993). Strategy and organizational evolution. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, J. V. (1986). Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 29(3), 562–585.Google Scholar
Song, M., & Parry, M. E. (1997). A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes: Japan and the United States. Journal of Marketing, 61(April), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, M., Im, S., Bij, H. V. D., & Song, L. Z. (2011). Does strategic planning enhance or impede innovation and firm performance? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(4), 503–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, J., & Peng, M. W. (2003). Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1249–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadhwa, A., & Kotha, S. (2006). Knowledge creation through external venturing: Evidence from the telecommunications equipment manufacturing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 819–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wan, W. P., & Yiu, D. W. (2009). From crisis to opportunity: Environmental jolt, corporate acquisitions, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(7), 791–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H., Choi, J., Wan, G., & Dong, J. Q. (2016). Slack resources and the rent-generating potential of firm-specific knowledge. Journal of Management, 42(2), 500–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, C., & Floyd, S. W. (2013). Strategic planning research toward a theory-driven agenda. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, M.-L., Wang, A. M.-L., & Cheng, K.-C. (2009). The impact of quality of IS information and budget slack on innovation performance. Technovation, 29(8), 527–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar