Skip to main content Accessibility help

Defining the Social Capital of the Board of Directors: An Exploratory Study

  • Gavin J. Nicholson (a1), Malcolm Alexander (a2) and Geoffrey C. Kiel (a3)


This paper advances the resource dependence and social networks literature by investigating a board's structural social capital created as a consequence of interlocking directorates. Using approaches and measures developed by social network analysis we compare the interpersonal directorship networks of the top 250 companies in the United States and Australia. We find that the smaller, sparser Australian network is only marginally less compact and connected than the larger US network at the firm level of analysis. However, at the director level of analysis the US network is much larger and more connected than its Australian counterpart. As a result, we argue that scholars studying the resource dependence role of boards should consider using measures of interpersonal links as well as traditional measures of inter-firm links.



Hide All
Adams, MA 2002a, ‘The convergence of international corporate governance systems – Where is Australia heading?’, Keeping Good Companies, vol. 54, pp 114.
Adams, MA 2002b, ‘The convergence of international corporate governance systems – Where is Australia heading? Part 2’, Keeping Good Companies, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 8287.
Adams, MA 2002c, ‘The convergence of international corporate governance systems – Where is Australia heading? Part 3’, Keeping Good Companies, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 144147.
Adler, PS & Kwon, S 2002, ‘Social capital: Prospects for a new concept’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 27, pp. 1740.
Albert, R & Barabási, A-L 2002, ‘Statistical mechanics of complex networks’, Reviews of Modem Physics, vol. 74, pp. 4797.
Aldrich, HE 1976, ‘Resource dependence and interorganizational relations: Local employment services sector organizations’, Administration and Society, vol. 7, pp. 419454.
Aldrich, HE 1979, Organizations and environments, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.
Aldrich, HE & Pfeffer, J 1976, ‘Environments of organizations’, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 2, pp. 79105.
Allen, MP 1974, ‘The structure of interorganizational elite cooptation: Interlocking corporate directorates’, American Sociological Review, vol. 39, pp. 393406.
Allen, MP 1976, ‘Management control in the large corporation: Comment on Zeitlin’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 81, pp. 885894.
Barabási, A-L 2002, Linked: The new science of networks. Perseus Pub., Cambridge, MA.
Baty, GB, Evan, WM & Rothermcl, TW 1971, ‘Personnel flows as interorganizational relations’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 16, pp. 430443.
Baysinger, BD & Butler, HN 1985, ‘Corporate governance and the board of directors: Performance effects of changes in board composition’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, vol. 1, pp. 101124.
Bazerman, MH & Schoorman, FD 1983, ‘A limited rationality model of interlocking directorates’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 8, pp. 206217.
Boeker, W & Goodstein, J 1991, ‘Organizational performance and adaptation: Effects of environment and performance on changes in board composition’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 34, pp. 805826.
Bollobás, B 2001, Random graphs, 2nd edn, Cambridge and New York, Cambridge University Press.
Borgatti, SP, Everett, MG & Freeman, LC 1999, ‘UCINET 5 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis’, Analytic Technologies and the University of Greenwich.
Boyd, BK 1990, ‘Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 11, pp. 419430.
Buchanan, M 2002, Nexus: Small worlds and the groundbreaking science of networks, New York, W.W. Norton.
Burt, RS 1979, ‘A structural theory of interlocking corporate directorates’, Social Networks, vol. 1, pp. 415435.
Burt, RS 1980a, ‘Autonomy in a social topology’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 85, pp. 892925.
Burt, RS 1980b, ‘Cooptive corporate actor networks: A reconsideration of interlocking directorates involving American manufacturing’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 25, pp. 557582.
Burt, RS 1983, Corporate profits and cooptation: Networks of market constraints and directorate ties in the American economy, New York, Academic Press.
Burt, RS 1992, Structural holes: The social structure of competition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Certo, ST 2003, ‘Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 432446.
Certo, ST, Daily, CM & Dalton, DR 2001, ‘Signaling firm value through board structure: An investigation of initial public offerings’, Entrepreneur ship Theory and Practice, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 3350.
Coleman, JS 1988, ‘Social capital in the creation of human capital’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 94, pp. S95S120.
Coleman, JS 1990, Foundations of social theory, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Crouse, T 1972, The boys on the bus: Riding with the campaign press corps, Random House, New York.
Daily, CM & Schwenk, C 1996, ‘Chief executive officers, top management teams, and boards of directors: Congruent or countervailing forces?’, Journal of Management, vol. 22, pp. 185208.
Dalton, DR, Daily, CM, Johnson, JL & Ellstrand, AE 1999, ‘Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 42, pp. 674686.
D'Aveni, RA 1990, ‘Top managerial prestige and organizational bankruptcy’, Organization Science, vol. 1, pp. 121142.
Davis, GF 1991, ‘Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 36, pp. 583613.
Davis, GF & Greve, HR 1997, ‘Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 103, pp. 137.
Davis, GF & Mizruchi, MS 1999, ‘The money center cannot hold: Commercial banks in the US system of corporate governance’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 44, pp. 215239.
Donaldson, L 1995, American anti-management theories of organization: A critique of paradigm proliferation, Cambridge and New York, Cambridge University Press.
Dooley, PC 1969, ‘The interlocking directorate’, American Economic Review, vol. 59, pp. 314323.
Dun & Bradstreet Marketing 1997, The business who's who of Australia, Dun & Bradstreet Marketing, Sydney.
Eisenhardt, KM 1989, ‘Agency theory: An assessment and review’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 14, pp. 5774.
Eisenhardt, KM & Schoonhoven, CB 1996, ‘Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms’, Organization Science, vol. 7, pp. 136150.
Emerson, RM 1972, ‘Exchange theory, Part I: A psychological basis for social exchange’, in Berger, J, Zelditch, M & Anderson, B (eds), Sociological theories in progress, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, pp. 5887.
Fligstein, N 1996, ‘Markets as politics: a political-cultural approach to market institutions’, American Sociological Review, vol. 61, pp. 656673.
Freeman, LC 1978/1979, ‘Centrality in social networks I: conceptual clarification’, Social Networks, vol. 1, pp. 215239.
Gabbay, SM & Leenders, RTAJ 1999, ‘CSC: The structure of advantage and disadvantage’ in Leenders, RTAJ & Gabbay, SM (eds), Corporate social capital and liability, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 114.
Galaskiewicz, J 1979, Exchange networks and community politics, Beverly Hills, CA, Sage Publications.
Gales, LM & Kesner, IF 1994, ‘An analysis of board of director size and composition in bankrupt organizations’, Journal of Business Research, vol. 30, pp. 271282.
Geletkanycz, MA & Hambrick, DC 1997, ‘The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 42, pp. 654681.
Granovetter, MS 1973, ‘The strength of weak ties’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 78, pp. 13601380.
Gulati, R, Nohria, N & Zaheer, A 2000, ‘Strategic networks’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 21, pp. 203215.
Gulati, R & Westphal, JD 1999, ‘Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO-board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 44, pp. 473506.
Hambrick, DC & D'Aveni, RA 1992, ‘Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies’, Management Science, vol. 38, pp. 14451466.
Haunschild, PR 1993, ‘Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 38, pp. 564592.
Haunschild, PR & Beckman, CM 1998, ‘When do interlocks matter?: Alternate sources of information and interlock influence’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 43, pp. 815844.
Heracleous, L & Murray, J 2001, ‘Networks, interlocking directors and strategy: Toward a theoretical framework’, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, vol. 18, pp. 137160.
Hillman, AJ, Cannella, AA Jr. & Paetzold, RL 2000, ‘The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change’, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 37, pp. 235255.
Hillman, AJ, Keim, GD & Luce, RA 2001, ‘Board composition and stakeholder performance: Do stakeholder directors make a difference?’, Business and Society, vol. 40, pp. 295314.
Hillman, AJ, Zardkoohi, A & Bierman, L 1999, ‘Corporate political strategies and firm performance: Indications of firm-specific benefits from personal service in the U.S. government’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 6781.
Jensen, MC & Meckling, WH 1976, ‘Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 3, pp. 305360.
Johnson, JL, Daily, CM & Ellstrand, AE 1996, ‘Boards of directors: A review and research Agenda’, Journal of Management, vol. 22, pp. 409438.
Katz, D & Kahn, RL 1978, The social psychology of organizations, 2nd edn, New York, Wiley.
Kilduff, M & Krackhardt, D 1994, ‘Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 37, pp. 87108.
Kono, C, Palmer, D, Friedland, R & Zafonte, M 1998, ‘Lost in space: The geography of corporate interlocking directorates’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 103, pp. 863911.
Krackhardt, D & Porter, LW 1985, ‘When friends leave: A structural analysis of the relationship between turnover and stayers' attitudes’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 30, pp. 242261.
Lin, N 2001, Social capital: A theory of social structure and action, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Means, GC (ed.) 1939, The structure of the American economy, Part 1, Basic characteristics, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office.
Miles, RE & Snow, CC 1993, ‘Internal markets and network organizations’ in Halal, WE, Geranmayeh, A & Pourdehnad, J (eds), Internal markets, John Wiley, New York, pp. 6786.
Mintz, B & Schwartz, M 1981, ‘Interlocking directorates and interest group formation’, American Sociological Review, vol. 46, pp. 851869.
Mizruchi, MS 1989, ‘Similarity of political behavior among large American corporations’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 95, pp. 401424.
Mizruchi, MS 1996, ‘What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates’, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 22, pp. 271298.
Mizruchi, MS & Stearns, LB 1988, ‘A longitudinal study of the formation of interlocking directorates’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 33, pp. 194210.
Mizruchi, MS & Stearns, LB 1994, ‘A longitudinal study of borrowing by large American corporations’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 39, pp. 118140.
Nahapiet, J & Ghoshal, S 1998, ‘Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 23, pp. 242266.
O'Reilly, CA III, Main, BG & Crystal, GS 1988, ‘CEO compensation as tournament and social comparison: A tale of two theories’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 33, pp. 257274.
Palmer, D 1983, ‘Broken ties: Interlocking directorates and intercorporate coordination’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 28, pp. 4055.
Palmer, D, Jennings, PD & Zhou, X 1989, ‘From growth strategies to institutional prescription: Adoption of the multidivisional form by large US corporations, 1962-1968’, paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco.
Partnoy, F 2003, Infectious greed. Great Britain: Henry Holt & CO.
Patman, W (Chairman of the Subcommittee on Domestic Finance) 1968, Commercial banks and their trust activities: emerging influence on the American economy, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office.
Pennings, JM 1980, Interlocking directorates: Origins and consequences of connections among organizations' boards of directors, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Pennings, JM 1981, ‘Strategically interdependent organizations’, in Nystrom, PC & Starbuck, WH (eds), Handbook of organizational design, vol. 1, Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 433455.
Pettigrew, AM 1992, ‘On studying managerial elites’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 13, pp. 163182.
Pfeffer, J 1972a, ‘Merger as a response to organizational interdependence’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 17, pp. 382394.
Pfeffer, J 1972b, ‘Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 17, pp. 218228.
Pfeffer, J 1991, ‘Organization theory and structural perspectives on management’, Journal of Management, vol. 17, pp. 789803.
Pfeffer, J & Leblebici, H 1973, ‘Executive recruitment and the development of interfirm organizations’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 18, pp. 449461.
Pfeffer, J & Nowak, P 1976, ‘Joint ventures and interorganizational interdependence’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 21, pp. 398418.
Pfeffer, J & Salancik, GR 1978, The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective, Harper & Row, New York.
Price, JL 1963, ‘The impact of governing boards on organizational effectiveness and morale’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 8, pp. 361378.
Provan, KG 1980, ‘Board power and organizational effectiveness among human service agencies’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 23, pp. 221236.
Reese, SD, Danielian, LH & Grant, A 1994, ‘The structure of news sources on television: A network analysis of “CBS News,” “Nightline,” “MacNeil/Lehrer,” and “This Week with David Brinkley”’, Journal of Communication, vol. 44, pp. 84107.
Richardson, RJ 1987, ‘Directorship interlocks and corporate profitability’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 32, pp. 367386.
Rosenstein, S & Wyatt, JG 1994, ‘Shareholder wealth effects when an officer of one corporation joins the board of directors of another’, Managerial and Decision Economics, vol. 15, pp. 317327.
Scott, J 2000, Social network analysis: A handbook, 2nd edn, London and Thousands Oaks, CA, SAGE Publications.
Selznick, P 1949, TVA and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization, Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.
Sigal, LV 1973, Reporters and officials, D.C. Heath, Lexington, MA.
Stearns, LB & Mizruchi, MS 1993, ‘Board composition and corporate financing: The impact of financial institution representation on borrowing’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 36, pp. 603618.
Stokman, FN, Ziegler, R & Scott, J 1985, Networks of corporate power, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Thompson, JD 1967, Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory, New York, McGraw-Hill.
Thompson, JD & McEwen, WJ 1958, ‘Organizational goals and environment: Goal-setting as an interaction process’, American Sociological Review, vol. 23, pp. 2331.
Tolbert, PS 1985, ‘Institutional environments and resource dependence: Sources of administrative structure in institutions of higher education’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 30, pp. 113.
Useem, M 1984, The inner circle: Large corporations and the rise of business political activity in the US and UK, Oxford University Press, New York.
Valente, TW & Foreman, RK 1998, ‘Integration and radiality: Measuring the extent of an individual's connectedness and reachability in a network’, Social Networks, vol. 20, pp. 89105.
Warner, WL & Unwalla, DB 1967, ‘The system of interlocking directorates’, in Warner, WL, Unwalla, DB & Trimm, JH (eds), The emergent American society: Large-scale organizations, New Haven, Yale University Press, pp. 121157.
Warren, RL 1967, ‘The interorganizational field as a focus for investigation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 12, pp. 396419.
Watts, DJ 1999, Small worlds: The dynamics of networks between order and randomness, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
Westphal, JD 1999, ‘Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 42, pp. 724.
Westphal, JD & Milton, LP 2000, ‘How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards’. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 45, pp. 366398.
Williamson, OE 1984, ‘Corporate governance’, Yale Law Journal, vol. 93, pp. 11971229.
Zahra, SA & Pearce, JA II 1989, ‘Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model’, Journal of Management, vol. 15, pp. 291334.
Zajac, EJ 1988, ‘Interlocking directorates as an interorganizational strategy: A test of critical assumptions’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 31, pp. 428438.
Zald, MN 1967, ‘Urban differentiation, characteristics of boards of directors, and organizational effectiveness’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 73, pp. 261272.
Zald, MN 1969, ‘The power and the functions of boards of directors: A theoretical synthesis’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 75, pp. 97111.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Management & Organization
  • ISSN: 1833-3672
  • EISSN: 1839-3527
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-management-and-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed