Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:48:15.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Defining the Social Capital of the Board of Directors: An Exploratory Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Gavin J. Nicholson ,
Malcolm Alexander  and
Geoffrey C. Kiel
Gavin J. Nicholson
Affiliation:
School of Business, University of Queensland Brisbane, Australia Phone:+61 7 3510 8111, Fax: +61 7 3510 8181, Email: g.nicholson@competitivedynamics.com.au
Malcolm Alexander
Affiliation:
School of Humanities, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia Phone: +61 7 3875 7169, Fax: +61 7 3875 7730, Email: M.Alexander@mailbox.gu.edu.au
Geoffrey C. Kiel
Affiliation:
School of Business, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia Phone: +61 7 3365 6758, Fax: +61 7 3365 6988, Email: g.kiel@gsm.uq.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper advances the resource dependence and social networks literature by investigating a board's structural social capital created as a consequence of interlocking directorates. Using approaches and measures developed by social network analysis we compare the interpersonal directorship networks of the top 250 companies in the United States and Australia. We find that the smaller, sparser Australian network is only marginally less compact and connected than the larger US network at the firm level of analysis. However, at the director level of analysis the US network is much larger and more connected than its Australian counterpart. As a result, we argue that scholars studying the resource dependence role of boards should consider using measures of interpersonal links as well as traditional measures of inter-firm links.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , January 2004 , pp. 54 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, MA 2002a, ‘The convergence of international corporate governance systems – Where is Australia heading?’, Keeping Good Companies, vol. 54, pp 1–14.Google Scholar
Adams, MA 2002b, ‘The convergence of international corporate governance systems – Where is Australia heading? Part 2’, Keeping Good Companies, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 82–87.Google Scholar
Adams, MA 2002c, ‘The convergence of international corporate governance systems – Where is Australia heading? Part 3’, Keeping Good Companies, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 144–147.Google Scholar
Adler, PS & Kwon, S 2002, ‘Social capital: Prospects for a new concept’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 27, pp. 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, R & Barabási, A-L 2002, ‘Statistical mechanics of complex networks’, Reviews of Modem Physics, vol. 74, pp. 47–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, HE 1976, ‘Resource dependence and interorganizational relations: Local employment services sector organizations’, Administration and Society, vol. 7, pp. 419–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, HE 1979, Organizations and environments, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Aldrich, HE & Pfeffer, J 1976, ‘Environments of organizations’, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 2, pp. 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, MP 1974, ‘The structure of interorganizational elite cooptation: Interlocking corporate directorates’, American Sociological Review, vol. 39, pp. 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, MP 1976, ‘Management control in the large corporation: Comment on Zeitlin’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 81, pp. 885–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barabási, A-L 2002, Linked: The new science of networks. Perseus Pub., Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Baty, GB, Evan, WM & Rothermcl, TW 1971, ‘Personnel flows as interorganizational relations’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 16, pp. 430–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baysinger, BD & Butler, HN 1985, ‘Corporate governance and the board of directors: Performance effects of changes in board composition’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, vol. 1, pp. 101–124.Google Scholar
Bazerman, MH & Schoorman, FD 1983, ‘A limited rationality model of interlocking directorates’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 8, pp. 206–217.Google Scholar
Boeker, W & Goodstein, J 1991, ‘Organizational performance and adaptation: Effects of environment and performance on changes in board composition’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 34, pp. 805–826.Google ScholarPubMed
Bollobás, B 2001, Random graphs, 2nd edn, Cambridge and New York, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, SP, Everett, MG & Freeman, LC 1999, ‘UCINET 5 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis’, Analytic Technologies and the University of Greenwich.Google Scholar
Boyd, BK 1990, ‘Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 11, pp. 419–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, M 2002, Nexus: Small worlds and the groundbreaking science of networks, New York, W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Burt, RS 1979, ‘A structural theory of interlocking corporate directorates’, Social Networks, vol. 1, pp. 415–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, RS 1980a, ‘Autonomy in a social topology’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 85, pp. 892–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, RS 1980b, ‘Cooptive corporate actor networks: A reconsideration of interlocking directorates involving American manufacturing’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 25, pp. 557–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, RS 1983, Corporate profits and cooptation: Networks of market constraints and directorate ties in the American economy, New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Burt, RS 1992, Structural holes: The social structure of competition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Certo, ST 2003, ‘Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 432–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Certo, ST, Daily, CM & Dalton, DR 2001, ‘Signaling firm value through board structure: An investigation of initial public offerings’, Entrepreneur ship Theory and Practice, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, JS 1988, ‘Social capital in the creation of human capital’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 94, pp. S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, JS 1990, Foundations of social theory, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Crouse, T 1972, The boys on the bus: Riding with the campaign press corps, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
Daily, CM & Schwenk, C 1996, ‘Chief executive officers, top management teams, and boards of directors: Congruent or countervailing forces?’, Journal of Management, vol. 22, pp. 185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, DR, Daily, CM, Johnson, JL & Ellstrand, AE 1999, ‘Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 42, pp. 674–686.Google Scholar
D'Aveni, RA 1990, ‘Top managerial prestige and organizational bankruptcy’, Organization Science, vol. 1, pp. 121–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, GF 1991, ‘Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 36, pp. 583–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, GF & Greve, HR 1997, ‘Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 103, pp. 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, GF & Mizruchi, MS 1999, ‘The money center cannot hold: Commercial banks in the US system of corporate governance’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 44, pp. 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, L 1995, American anti-management theories of organization: A critique of paradigm proliferation, Cambridge and New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dooley, PC 1969, ‘The interlocking directorate’, American Economic Review, vol. 59, pp. 314–323.Google Scholar
Dun & Bradstreet Marketing 1997, The business who's who of Australia, Dun & Bradstreet Marketing, Sydney.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, KM 1989, ‘Agency theory: An assessment and review’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 14, pp. 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, KM & Schoonhoven, CB 1996, ‘Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms’, Organization Science, vol. 7, pp. 136–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, RM 1972, ‘Exchange theory, Part I: A psychological basis for social exchange’, in Berger, J, Zelditch, M & Anderson, B (eds), Sociological theories in progress, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, pp. 58–87.Google Scholar
Fligstein, N 1996, ‘Markets as politics: a political-cultural approach to market institutions’, American Sociological Review, vol. 61, pp. 656–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, LC 1978/1979, ‘Centrality in social networks I: conceptual clarification’, Social Networks, vol. 1, pp. 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabbay, SM & Leenders, RTAJ 1999, ‘CSC: The structure of advantage and disadvantage’ in Leenders, RTAJ & Gabbay, SM (eds), Corporate social capital and liability, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Galaskiewicz, J 1979, Exchange networks and community politics, Beverly Hills, CA, Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Gales, LM & Kesner, IF 1994, ‘An analysis of board of director size and composition in bankrupt organizations’, Journal of Business Research, vol. 30, pp. 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geletkanycz, MA & Hambrick, DC 1997, ‘The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 42, pp. 654–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, MS 1973, ‘The strength of weak ties’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 78, pp. 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulati, R, Nohria, N & Zaheer, A 2000, ‘Strategic networks’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 21, pp. 203–215.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulati, R & Westphal, JD 1999, ‘Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO-board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 44, pp. 473–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambrick, DC & D'Aveni, RA 1992, ‘Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies’, Management Science, vol. 38, pp. 1445–1466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haunschild, PR 1993, ‘Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 38, pp. 564–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haunschild, PR & Beckman, CM 1998, ‘When do interlocks matter?: Alternate sources of information and interlock influence’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 43, pp. 815–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heracleous, L & Murray, J 2001, ‘Networks, interlocking directors and strategy: Toward a theoretical framework’, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, vol. 18, pp. 137–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, AJ, Cannella, AA Jr. & Paetzold, RL 2000, ‘The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change’, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 37, pp. 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, AJ, Keim, GD & Luce, RA 2001, ‘Board composition and stakeholder performance: Do stakeholder directors make a difference?’, Business and Society, vol. 40, pp. 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, AJ, Zardkoohi, A & Bierman, L 1999, ‘Corporate political strategies and firm performance: Indications of firm-specific benefits from personal service in the U.S. government’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 67–81.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, MC & Meckling, WH 1976, ‘Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 3, pp. 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, JL, Daily, CM & Ellstrand, AE 1996, ‘Boards of directors: A review and research Agenda’, Journal of Management, vol. 22, pp. 409–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, D & Kahn, RL 1978, The social psychology of organizations, 2nd edn, New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Kilduff, M & Krackhardt, D 1994, ‘Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 37, pp. 87–108.Google Scholar
Kono, C, Palmer, D, Friedland, R & Zafonte, M 1998, ‘Lost in space: The geography of corporate interlocking directorates’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 103, pp. 863–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krackhardt, D & Porter, LW 1985, ‘When friends leave: A structural analysis of the relationship between turnover and stayers' attitudes’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 30, pp. 242–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, N 2001, Social capital: A theory of social structure and action, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Means, GC (ed.) 1939, The structure of the American economy, Part 1, Basic characteristics, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Miles, RE & Snow, CC 1993, ‘Internal markets and network organizations’ in Halal, WE, Geranmayeh, A & Pourdehnad, J (eds), Internal markets, John Wiley, New York, pp. 67–86.Google Scholar
Mintz, B & Schwartz, M 1981, ‘Interlocking directorates and interest group formation’, American Sociological Review, vol. 46, pp. 851–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizruchi, MS 1989, ‘Similarity of political behavior among large American corporations’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 95, pp. 401–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizruchi, MS 1996, ‘What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates’, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 22, pp. 271–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizruchi, MS & Stearns, LB 1988, ‘A longitudinal study of the formation of interlocking directorates’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 33, pp. 194–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizruchi, MS & Stearns, LB 1994, ‘A longitudinal study of borrowing by large American corporations’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 39, pp. 118–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nahapiet, J & Ghoshal, S 1998, ‘Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 23, pp. 242–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Reilly, CA III, Main, BG & Crystal, GS 1988, ‘CEO compensation as tournament and social comparison: A tale of two theories’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 33, pp. 257–274.Google Scholar
Palmer, D 1983, ‘Broken ties: Interlocking directorates and intercorporate coordination’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 28, pp. 40–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, D, Jennings, PD & Zhou, X 1989, ‘From growth strategies to institutional prescription: Adoption of the multidivisional form by large US corporations, 1962-1968’, paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Partnoy, F 2003, Infectious greed. Great Britain: Henry Holt & CO.Google Scholar
Patman, W (Chairman of the Subcommittee on Domestic Finance) 1968, Commercial banks and their trust activities: emerging influence on the American economy, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Pennings, JM 1980, Interlocking directorates: Origins and consequences of connections among organizations' boards of directors, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Pennings, JM 1981, ‘Strategically interdependent organizations’, in Nystrom, PC & Starbuck, WH (eds), Handbook of organizational design, vol. 1, Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 433–455.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, AM 1992, ‘On studying managerial elites’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 13, pp. 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J 1972a, ‘Merger as a response to organizational interdependence’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 17, pp. 382–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J 1972b, ‘Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 17, pp. 218–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J 1991, ‘Organization theory and structural perspectives on management’, Journal of Management, vol. 17, pp. 789–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J & Leblebici, H 1973, ‘Executive recruitment and the development of interfirm organizations’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 18, pp. 449–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J & Nowak, P 1976, ‘Joint ventures and interorganizational interdependence’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 21, pp. 398–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J & Salancik, GR 1978, The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective, Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
Price, JL 1963, ‘The impact of governing boards on organizational effectiveness and morale’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 8, pp. 361–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provan, KG 1980, ‘Board power and organizational effectiveness among human service agencies’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 23, pp. 221–236.Google ScholarPubMed
Reese, SD, Danielian, LH & Grant, A 1994, ‘The structure of news sources on television: A network analysis of “CBS News,” “Nightline,” “MacNeil/Lehrer,” and “This Week with David Brinkley”’, Journal of Communication, vol. 44, pp. 84–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, RJ 1987, ‘Directorship interlocks and corporate profitability’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 32, pp. 367–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstein, S & Wyatt, JG 1994, ‘Shareholder wealth effects when an officer of one corporation joins the board of directors of another’, Managerial and Decision Economics, vol. 15, pp. 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J 2000, Social network analysis: A handbook, 2nd edn, London and Thousands Oaks, CA, SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Selznick, P 1949, TVA and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization, Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sigal, LV 1973, Reporters and officials, D.C. Heath, Lexington, MA.Google Scholar
Stearns, LB & Mizruchi, MS 1993, ‘Board composition and corporate financing: The impact of financial institution representation on borrowing’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 36, pp. 603–618.Google Scholar
Stokman, FN, Ziegler, R & Scott, J 1985, Networks of corporate power, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thompson, JD 1967, Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory, New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Thompson, JD & McEwen, WJ 1958, ‘Organizational goals and environment: Goal-setting as an interaction process’, American Sociological Review, vol. 23, pp. 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolbert, PS 1985, ‘Institutional environments and resource dependence: Sources of administrative structure in institutions of higher education’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 30, pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Useem, M 1984, The inner circle: Large corporations and the rise of business political activity in the US and UK, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Valente, TW & Foreman, RK 1998, ‘Integration and radiality: Measuring the extent of an individual's connectedness and reachability in a network’, Social Networks, vol. 20, pp. 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, WL & Unwalla, DB 1967, ‘The system of interlocking directorates’, in Warner, WL, Unwalla, DB & Trimm, JH (eds), The emergent American society: Large-scale organizations, New Haven, Yale University Press, pp. 121–157.Google Scholar
Warren, RL 1967, ‘The interorganizational field as a focus for investigation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 12, pp. 396–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, DJ 1999, Small worlds: The dynamics of networks between order and randomness, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, JD 1999, ‘Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 42, pp. 7–24.Google Scholar
Westphal, JD & Milton, LP 2000, ‘How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards’. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 45, pp. 366–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, OE 1984, ‘Corporate governance’, Yale Law Journal, vol. 93, pp. 1197–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahra, SA & Pearce, JA II 1989, ‘Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model’, Journal of Management, vol. 15, pp. 291–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajac, EJ 1988, ‘Interlocking directorates as an interorganizational strategy: A test of critical assumptions’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 31, pp. 428–438.Google Scholar
Zald, MN 1967, ‘Urban differentiation, characteristics of boards of directors, and organizational effectiveness’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 73, pp. 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zald, MN 1969, ‘The power and the functions of boards of directors: A theoretical synthesis’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 75, pp. 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar