Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T11:23:22.485Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Career calling climate: The development and validation of a scale for a new construct

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2023

Jiatian Chen Open the ORCID record for Jiatian Chen [Opens in a new window] ,
Douglas R. May  and
Catherine E. Schwoerer
Jiatian Chen*
Affiliation:
School of Business and Public Administration, California State University, Bakersfield, 9001 Stockdale Highway, BDC 228A, Bakersfield, CA 93311, USA
Douglas R. May
Affiliation:
School of Business, The University of Kansas, 1654 Naismith Drive, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA
Catherine E. Schwoerer
Affiliation:
School of Business, The University of Kansas, 1654 Naismith Drive, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA
*
Corresponding author: Jiatian Chen, E-mail: jchen34@csub.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Having a sense of calling toward one's work has key benefits for both the employee and the employer. Yet, little is known about whether and what kind of work climate facilitates employees' senses of calling, hindering efforts toward positive changes from managers and organizations. This research introduces the concept of ‘career calling climate’ and describes the development of a scale (i.e., Career Calling Climate Scale) to measure the level of support that a work unit provides for its employees' pursuit of a calling. We established the scale's validity and reliability using survey responses from participants of various occupations and age. To provide evidence of its predictive validity, we examined career calling climate's relation with career callings using a sample of 189 healthcare employees nested in 34 work units. Results suggested that career calling climate predicted individuals' career callings. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

Keywords

Career calling climatecareer callingscale developmentwork climate
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , First View , pp. 1 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Culpepper, S. A. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1490–1528. doi: 10.1177/0149206313478188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1991). Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 732–740. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartko, J. J. (1976). On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients. Psychological bulletin, 83(5), 762–765. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.83.5.762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 65–122). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Biemann, T., Cole, M. S., & Voelpel, S. (2012). Within-group agreement: On the use (and misuse) of rWG and rWG (J) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 66–80. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bott, E. M., Duffy, R. D., Borges, N. J., Braun, T. L., Jordan, K. P., & Marino, J. F. (2017). Called to medicine: Physicians’ experiences of career calling. The Career Development Quarterly, 65(2), 113–130. doi: 10.1002/cdq.12086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on psychological science, 6(1), 3–5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buis, B. C., Ferguson, A. J., & Briscoe, J. P. (2019). Finding the “I” in “Team”: The role of groups in an individual's pursuit of calling. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 114, 88–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2019.02.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunderson, J. S., & Thompson, J. A. (2009). The call of the wild: Zookeepers, callings, and the double-edged sword of deeply meaningful work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 32–57. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234–246. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J., May, D. R., Schwoerer, C. E., & Augelli, B. (2018). Exploring the boundaries of career calling: The moderating roles of procedural justice and psychological safety. Journal of Career Development, 45(2), 103–116. doi: 10.1177/0894845316671214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Y., & Jiang, W. Y. (2021). If you do what you love, will the money follow? How work orientation impacts objective career outcomes via managerial (Mis) perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 65(4), 1353–1382. doi: 10.5465/amj.2020.0841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullen, J. B., Victor, B., & Bronson, J. W. (1993). The ethical climate questionnaire: An assessment of its development and validity. Psychological Reports, 73(2), 667–674. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1993.73.2.667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological bulletin, 125(6), 627–668. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dik, B. J., & Duffy, R. D. (2009). Calling and vocation at work definitions and prospects for research and practice. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(3), 424–450. doi: 10.1177/0011000008316430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dik, B. J., Eldridge, B. M., Steger, M. F., & Duffy, R. D. (2012). Development and validation of the calling and vocation questionnaire (CVQ) and brief calling scale (BCS). Journal of Career Assessment, 20(3), 242–263. doi: 10.1177/1069072711434410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrow, S. R. (2013). Dynamics of calling: A longitudinal study of musicians. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(4), 431–452. doi: 10.1002/job.1808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrow, S., & Heller, D. (2015). Follow your heart or your head? A longitudinal study of the facilitating role of calling and ability in the pursuit of a challenging career. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 695–712. doi: 10.1037/a0038011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrow, S. R., & Tosti-Kharas, J. (2011). Calling: The development of a scale measure. Personnel Psychology, 64(4), 1001–1049. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01234.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, R. D., & Autin, K. L. (2013). Disentangling the link between perceiving a calling and living a calling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60, 219–227. doi: 10.1037/a0031934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, R. D., Dik, B. J., & Steger, M. F. (2011). Calling and work-related outcomes: Career commitment as a mediator. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78(2), 210–218. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2010.09.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, R. D., Douglass, R. P., Gensmer, N. P., England, J. W., & Kim, H. J. (2018). An initial examination of the work as calling theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 65(4), 423–439. doi: 10.1037/cou0000276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J. K., MacCallum, R. C., & Tait, M. (1986). The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis. Personnel Psychology, 39(2), 291–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00583.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382–388. doi: 10.2307/3150980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. doi: 10.1002/job.322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Romá, V., Peiró, J. M., & Tordera, N. (2002). An examination of the antecedents and moderator influences of climate strength. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 465–473. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.465CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, A. M., & Berg, J. M. (2011). Prosocial motivation at work: When, why, and how making a difference makes a difference. In Cameron, K. & Spreitzer, G. (Eds.), Handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 28–44). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, D. T., & Chandler, D. E. (2005). Psychological success: When the career is a calling. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(2), 155–176. doi: 10.1002/job.301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, D. A., & McLaughlin, M. E. (1993). Cognitive processes in self-report responses: Tests of item context effects in work attitude measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 129–140. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.129CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendrickson, A. E., & White, P. O. (1964). Promax: A quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 17(1), 65–70. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1964.tb00244.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21(5), 967–988. doi: 10.1177/014920639502100509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104–121. doi: 10.1177/109442819800100106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinkin, T. R., & Tracey, J. B. (1999). An analysis of variance approach to content validation. Organizational Research Methods, 2(2), 175–186. doi: 10.1177/109442819922004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschi, A. (2012). Callings and work engagement: Moderated mediation model of work meaningfulness, occupational identity, and occupational self-efficacy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59(3), 479–485. doi: 10.1037/a0028949CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirschi, A., Keller, A. C., & Spurk, D. M. (2018). Living one's calling: Job resources as a link between having and living a calling. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 106, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2017.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2), 219–229. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.67.2.219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85–98. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. P., & James, L. R. (1979). Psychological climate: Dimensions and relationships of individual and aggregated work environment perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23(2), 201–250. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(79)90056-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Klein, K. J., Conn, A. B., Smith, D. B., & Sorra, J. S. (2001). Is everyone in agreement? An exploration of within-group agreement in employee perceptions of the work environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 3–16. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 195–229. doi: 10.5465/amr.1994.9410210745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2000). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W., & Doherty, M. L. (1989). Integration of climate and leadership: Examination of a neglected issue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 546–553. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreft, I. G., & De Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuenzi, M., & Schminke, M. (2009). Assembling fragments into a lens: A review, critique, and proposed research agenda for the organizational work climate literature. Journal of Management, 35(3), 634–717. doi: 10.1177/0149206308330559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852. doi: 10.1177/1094428106296642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, J. S. (1983). Confirmatory factor analysis: A preface to LISREL. Beverly Hills: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011). Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 293–334. doi: 10.2307/23044045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, K. D., & Cullen, J. B. (2006). Continuities and extensions of ethical climate theory: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 175–194. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9084-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11–37. doi: 10.1348/096317904322915892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohring, K. (2012). The fixed effects approach as alternative to multilevel models for crossnational analyses (Working paper series). Cologne, Germany. GK SOCLIFE University.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Pandey, A., Gupta, R. K., & Arora, A. (2009). Spiritual climate of business organizations and its impact on customers’ experience. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 313–332. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9965-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawat, A., & Nadavulakere, S. (2015). Examining the outcomes of having a calling: Does context matter? Journal of Business and Psychology, 30, 499–512. doi: 10.1007/s10869-014-9378-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91–127. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schabram, K., & Maitlis, S. (2017). Negotiating the challenges of a calling: Emotion and enacted sensemaking in animal shelter work. Academy of Management Journal, 60(2), 584–609. doi: 10.5465/amj.2013.0665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 361–388. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143809CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, B., Salvaggio, A. N., & Subirats, M. (2002). Climate strength: A new direction for climate research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 220–229. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.87.2.220CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwab, D. P. (1980). Construct validity in organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 3–43.Google Scholar
Seibert, S. E., Silver, S. R., & Randolph, W. A. (2004). Taking empowerment to the next level: A multiple-level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 332–349. doi: 10.5465/20159585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seong, J. Y., & Kristof-Brown, A. L. (2012). Testing multidimensional models of person-group fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(6), 536–556. doi: 10.1108/02683941211252419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straub, D., Boudreau, M.-C., & Gefen, D. (2004). Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. The Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13(1), 380–427. doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.01324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tay, L., Woo, S. E., & Vermunt, J. K. (2014). A conceptual and methodological framework for psychometric isomorphism: Validation of multilevel construct measures. Organizational Research Methods, 17(1), 77–106. doi: 10.1177/1094428113517008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J. A., & Bunderson, J. S. (2019). Research on work as a calling… and how to make it matter. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 421–443. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 101–125. doi: 10.2307/2392857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201. doi: 10.5465/amr.2001.4378011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, G., Wu, C. H., & Yang, C. T. (2008). Examining the content validity of the WHOQOL-BREF from respondents’ perspective by quantitative methods. Social Indicators Research, 85(3), 483–498. doi: 10.1007/s11205-007-9112-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Y., Chen, T., Wang, J., Wang, M., Johnson, R. E., & Jin, Y. (2021). How critical activities within COVID-19 intensive care units increase nurses’ daily occupational calling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(1), 4–14. doi: doi:10.1037/apl0000853CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Chen et al. supplementary material

Appendices A-B

Download Chen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 18.5 KB