Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-kpmwg Total loading time: 0.298 Render date: 2021-12-07T07:05:25.461Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

How ambidextrous organizational culture affects job performance: A multilevel study of the mediating effect of psychological capital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2017

Jee Young Lee
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Defense Management, Korea National Defense University, Ko-Yang Si, Korea
Yumi Seo*
Affiliation:
College of Business Administration, University of Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea
Wonho Jeung
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Defense Management, Korea National Defense University, Ko-Yang Si, Korea
Joon-ho Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Business Administration, Sejong University, Ko-Yang Si, Korea
*
Corresponding author: ys263@uos.ac.kr

Abstract

Ambidexterity organization, which is defined as the ability of an organization to simultaneously pursues exploration and exploitation, has received attention by researchers who have examined its beneficial effect on organizational performance and success. This study attempted to examine the positive effect of ambidextrous organization culture (AOC), which is regarded as the core characteristic of ambidextrous organizations by using a multilevel model. Specifically, this study examined the effects of AOC on members’ job performance and the mediating role of psychological capital in the relationship between AOC and job performance. The results indicated that AOC had a significantly positive relationship with job performance even after controlling various organizational and individual variables. Moreover, we found that psychological capital fully mediated the relationship between AOC and members’ job performance. This study provides theoretical contributions by empirically examining the positive effect and mechanism of AOC. Furthermore, this study offers practical implications in how practitioners can manage their organizational culture, by helping shape the direction of organizational culture management.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, P. S., Goldoftas, B., & Levine, D. I. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 10(1), 4368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avey, J. B. (2014). The left side of psychological capital new evidence on the antecedents of PsyCap. Journal of Leadership & Organization Studies, 21(2), 141149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2010). The additive value of positive psychological capital in predicting work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(2), 430452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avey, J. B., Nimnicht, J. L., & Pigeon, N. G. (2010). Two field studies examining the association between positive psychological capital and employee performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(5), 384401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avey, J. B., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F., & Mhatre, K. H. (2011). Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(2), 127152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 11731182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, C. (2008). Talking Southwest culture. Southwest Airlines Spirit Magazine, 5, 6. San Antonio, TX: Pace.Google Scholar
Beckman, C. M. (2006). The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 741758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework (3rd Edition). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Y. S. (2014). The contextual factors on ambidextrous organizational culture. Korean Academy of Human Resource Management, 21(1), 6382.Google Scholar
Chang, Y. S., & Moon, H. G. (2011). Organizational culture fostering ambidexterity in organizations. Korean Academy of Management, 19(2), 169200.Google Scholar
Cho, S. S., & Huh, M. G. (2013). Leadership, culture, and organizational ambidexterity: Based on the competing values model. Korean Academy of Human Resource Management, 20(1), 1538.Google Scholar
Clapp-Smith, R., Vogelgesang, G. R., & Avey, J. B. (2009). Authentic leadership and positive psychological capital: The mediating role of trust at the group level of analysis. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(3), 227240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combs, G. M., Milosevic, I., Jeung, W., & Griffith, J. (2011). Ethnic identity and job attribute preferences: The role of collectivism and psychological capital. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19(1), 516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, J. M. & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555590.Google Scholar
Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). In Т. Deal & A. Kennedy (Eds), Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of organizational life (Chapter 5, Vol. 2, pp. 98–103). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Denison, D. R. (1990). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness. Wiley Series on organizational assessment and change. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Edgar, F., Gray, B., Browning, V., & Dwyer, K. (2014). Cultural drivers of high performing knowledge-intensive service organisations. Journal of Management & Organization, 20(1), 5678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209226.Google Scholar
Goodman, E. A., Zammuto, R. F., & Gifford, B. D. (2001). The Competing Values Framework: Understanding the impact of organizational culture on the quality of work life. Organization Development Journal, 19(3), 5868.Google Scholar
Gooty, J., Gavin, M., Johnson, P. D., Frazier, M. L., & Snow, D. B. (2009). In the eyes of the beholder transformational leadership, positive psychological capital, and performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(4), 353367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackman, J. R. (1992). Group influences on individuals in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Harman, H. H. (1967). ). Modem factor analysis . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Hartnell, C. A., Ou, A. Y., & Kinicki, A. (2011). Organizational culture and organizational effectiveness: A meta-analytic investigation of the Competing Values Framework’s theoretical suppositions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 677694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herscovitch, L., & Meyer, J. P. (2002). Commitment to organizational change: Extension of a three-component mode. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 474487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooijberg, R., & Petrock, F. (1993). On cultural change: Using the Competing Values Framework to help leaders execute a transformational strategy. Human Resource Management, 32(1), 2950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, M., Hughesw, P., & Morganz, R. E. (2007). Exploitative learning and entrepreneurial orientation alignment in emerging young firms: Implications for market and response performance. British Journal of Management, 18, 359375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, J. J. P., Tempelaar, M. P., van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4), 797811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, J., Nam, C., Lee, E., & Kim, S. (2016). Subculture by autonomy and group cohesion and its effect on job satisfaction of R&D professionals in an R&D organization. Journal of Management & Organization, 22(2), 154172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V. A. S., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalliath, T. J., Bluedorn, A. C., & Strube, M. J. (1999). A test of value congruence effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(7), 11751198.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, A. S., Wallis, J., & Cooke, R. A. (2013). The impact of leadership styles on organizational culture and firm effectiveness: An empirical study. Journal of Management & Organization, 19(3), 241254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. S., & Choi, Y. D. (2010). A study on antecedents and consequences of positive psychological capital in organizations. Korean Academic Society of Business Administration, 39(1), 128.Google Scholar
Leung, A., & Chaturvedi, S. (2011). Linking the fits, fitting the links: Connecting different types of PO fit to attitudinal outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 391402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(6), 695706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Norman, S. M., & Combs, G. M. (2006). Psychological capital development: Toward a micro‐intervention. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 387393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luthans, F., Norman, S. M., Avolio, B. J., & Avey, J. B. (2008). The mediating role of psychological capital in the supportive organizational climate—Employee performance relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(2), 219238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2007). Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of Management, 33(3), 321349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. C. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 7187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, R. G. (2001). Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 118131.Google Scholar
Newman, A., Ucbasaran, D., Zhu, F., & Hirst, G. (2014). Psychological capital: A review and synthesis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(1), 120138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA, England: Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487516.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, S. J., Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Zhang, Z. (2011). Psychological capital and employee performance: A latent growth modeling approach. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 427450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, R. E., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1991). The psychometrics of the competing values culture instrument and an analysis of the impact of organizational culture on quality of life. In Woodman, R. W. & Pasmore, W. A. (eds.), Research in Organizational Change and Development. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rego, A., Sousa, F., Marques, C., & Cunha, M. P. (2012). Authentic leadership promoting employees’ psychological capital and creativity. Journal of Business Research, 65(3), 429437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2000). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: London, New Delhi: SAGE Publication.Google Scholar
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schein, E. H. (1990). Organizational culture. American Psychologist, 45(2), 109119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 864894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(3), 339358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, T., Zhao, X. W., Yang, L. B., & Fan, L. H. (2012). The impact of psychological capital on job embeddedness and job performance among nurses: A structural equation approach. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(1), 6979.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, N., Swart, J., & Maylor, H. (2013). Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: a review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(3), 317332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VandeWalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 9951015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2004). Strategic leadership and organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 222240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C. L., & Rafiq, M. (2014). Ambidextrous organizational culture, contextual ambidexterity and new product innovation: A comparative study of UK and Chinese high‐tech firms. British Journal of Management, 25(1), 5876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77140.Google Scholar
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, W. M., & Yang, L. T. (1999). Organizational creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.), Handbook of creativity, pp. 373–391. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, J., Mossholder, K. W., & Peng, T. K. (2009). Supervisory procedural justice effects: The mediating roles of cognitive and affective trust. Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 143154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

How ambidextrous organizational culture affects job performance: A multilevel study of the mediating effect of psychological capital
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

How ambidextrous organizational culture affects job performance: A multilevel study of the mediating effect of psychological capital
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

How ambidextrous organizational culture affects job performance: A multilevel study of the mediating effect of psychological capital
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *