Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T00:00:23.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

W. P. Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic typology: studies in the phenomenology of language. Austin and London: University of Texas Press, 1978. Pp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

N. V. Smith
N. V. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Phonetics and LinguisticsUniversity College London.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , March 1980 , pp. 150 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adelung, J. C. (1806–1817). Mithridates, vols. 1–3. Berlin: Voss.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, D. (1977). Word order universals and the existence of OVS languages. Lln 8. 590–598.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, D. (1979). Hixkaryana. Lingua Descriptive Studies 1.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, D. & Pullum, G. (1978). Object-initial languages. Paper presented at the Summer Meeting of Linguistic Society of America at Urbana, Illinois. To appear.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. (1972). The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, (ed), Universals language. Cambridge, Mass: MIT press. 73113.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. (1974). Targets and syntactic change. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, J. (1974). Is Dyirbal ergative? Linguistics. 17. 401–63.Google Scholar
Koch, M. (1974). A demystification of syntactic drift. Montreal Working Papers in Linguistics 3. 63–114.Google Scholar
Kuno, S. (1973). The structure of the Japanese language. MIT press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, W. (1973). A structural principle of language and its implications. Lg 49, 47–66.Google Scholar
Lehmann, W. (1974). Proto–Indo-European syntax. University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Li, C. N. & Thompson, S. (1976a). Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In Li, (ed), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press. 457–489.Google Scholar
Lingua Descriptive Series Questionnaire. Lingua (1977), 1–72.Google Scholar
Maling, J. (1972). On ‘gapping and the order of constituents’. Lln 3. 101–108.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. (1971). English as a VSO language. Lg 46. 286–299.Google Scholar
Osgood, C. & Tanz, C. (1977). Will the real direct object in bitransitive sentences please stand up? In Juilland, A. (ed.), Linguistic studies offered to Joseph Greenberg. Saratoga, California: Anma Libri, Vol. III, 537–590.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. (1971). Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Pullum, G. K. (1979). Syntactic relations and linguistic universals. To appear in TPhS.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Dixon, (ed), Grammatical categories in Australian languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Smith, N. V. (1969). The Nupe verb. AfrLS 10. 90–160.Google Scholar
Smith, N. V. (forthcoming). On the notion ‘consistent language’. To appear inJL.Google Scholar
Vattuone, B. (1975). Notes on Genoese syntax. University College London Mimeo.Google Scholar