Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T20:07:17.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Robert P. Stockwell & Ronald K. S. Macaulay (eds), Linguistic change and generative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1972. Pp. xvii + 301.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Nigel Vincent
Affiliation:
Darwin College, Cambridge.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, C.-J. N. (1970). A new intonation theory to account for pan-English and idiom-particular patterns. Papers in linguistics 2. 522604.Google Scholar
Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word 14. 150177.Google Scholar
Bever, T. G. (1970a). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Hayes, J. (ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bever, T. G. (1970b). The influence of speech performance on linguistic competence. In D'Arcais, Flores G. & Levelt, W. (eds), Advances in psycholinguistics. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Bever, T. G. & Langendoen, D. T. (1971). A dynamic model of the evolution of language. Lin 2. 433465.Google Scholar
Cazden, C. B. (1968). The acquisition of noun and verb inflections. Child development 39. 433448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Cohen, V. B. (1971). Foleyology. In Papers from the seventh regional meeting of the Chicago linguistic society. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. & Langendoen, D. T. (eds) (1971). Studies in linguistic semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Fromkin, V. (1968). Speculations on performance models. JL 4. 4768.Google Scholar
Hall, R. A. (1968). An essay on language. New York: Chilton.Google Scholar
King, R. D. (1969). Historical linguistics and generative grammar. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1965). Phonological change. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1968). Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. T. (eds), Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Kurylowicz, J. (19451949). La nature des procès dits ‘analogiques’. In Hamp, E. P. et al. (eds) (1966), Readings in linguistics II. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. P. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Lg 45. 715762.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1972). How intrinsic is content? Markedness, sound change, and ‘family universals’. Edinburgh Working papers in linguistics 1. 4267.Google Scholar
Manczak, W. (1958). Tendances générales des changements analogiques. Lingua 7. 298325, 387420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reighard, J. (1971). Some observations on syntactic change in verbs. In Papers from the seventh regional meeting of the Chicago linguistic Society. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schachter, P. (1969). Natural assimilation rules in Akan. IJAL 35. 342355.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1966). The acquisition of Russian as a native language. In Smith, F. & Miller, G. A. (eds), The genesis of language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar