Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

The range of linguistic units: Distance effects in English mandative subjunctive constructions

  • THOMAS BERG (a1), TIM ZINGLER (a2) and ARNE LOHMANN (a3)
  • Please note a correction has been issued for this article.

Abstract

This study examines the role of distance in the decision among grammatical variants. The empirical test case is the English mandative subjunctive construction, which co-occurs with an embedded modal auxiliary, a subjunctive or an indicative verb form. The fact that the subjunctive is triggered by specific lexical items allows one to measure the distance between the triggering unit and the target verb. This distance is found to play a significant role in the grammatical decision process. With increasing distance between trigger and target, the probability of selecting a modal auxiliary increases and the probability of selecting the subjunctive decreases. The theoretical account hinges on the range and strength of linguistic units. Syntactic units (i.e. modals) are claimed to have a wider range than morphological units (i.e. indicative and subjunctive). Furthermore, the indicative is claimed to have a wider range than the subjunctive. Varying ranges are interpreted as varying decay rates. The lower decay rate of syntactic as compared to morphological units results from the syntactic level being superordinated to the morphological level in language production. The inclusion of the semantic and the phonological levels confirms that the position of a level in the structural hierarchy determines its range.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Author’s address: Department of English, University of Hamburg, Überseering 35, 22297 Hamburg, Germanythomas_berg@uni-hamburg.de
Author’s address: Department of Linguistics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USAtimzingler@unm.edu
Author’s address: Department of English, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Universitätsstrasse 1, 40225 Düsseldorf, GermanyArne.Lohmann@uni-duesseldorf.de

Footnotes

Hide All

A foretaste of the final product was given in a pleasant atmosphere at the University of Bamberg in June 2016. Our heartfelt thanks go to Tayo Takada, Gonca Bakir and André Geisler who invested much effort in the data coding procedure, to Julia Schlüter for helpful comments and to Benedikt Szmrecsanyi for sharing some of his data with us. We would have liked to have seen Tayo’s name at the top of the page, but unfortunately things do not always turn out the way they should. The final version has greatly benefited from the suggestions of the three Journal of Linguistics referees, to whom we gladly express our gratitude.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Arnold, Jennifer E., Wasow, Thomas, Losongco, Anthony & Ginstrom, Ryan. 2000. Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language 76, 2855.
Auer, Anita. 2008. Lestthe situation deteriorates: A study of lest as trigger of the inflectional subjunctive. In Locher, Miriam A. & Strässler, Jürg (eds.), Standards and norms in the English language, 149173. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Barr, Dale J., Levy, Roger, Scheepers, Christoph & Tily, Harry J.. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68, 255278.
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4 . Journal of Statistical Software 67, 148.
Begg, Ian & Wickelgren, Wayne A.. 1974. Retention functions for syntactic and lexical vs. semantic information in sentence recognition memory. Memory & Cognition 2, 353359.
Behaghel, Otto. 1909. Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern. Indogermanische Forschungen 25, 110142.
Belnap, R. Kirk. 1999. A new perspective on the history of Arabic variation in marking agreement with plural heads. Folia Linguistica 33, 169185.
Berg, Thomas. 2008. On the complementary nature of consonant and vowel harmony in child and adult language. Word 59, 241256.
Berg, Thomas. 2019. Adjective phrases with doubly modified heads: How lexical information influences word order and constituent structure. English Language & Linguistics 23, 341361.
Berlage, Eva. 2014. Noun phrase complexity in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bock, J. Kathryn. 1986. Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18, 355387.
Bock, J. Kathryn & Cutting, J. Cooper. 1992. Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production. Journal of Memory and Language 31, 99127.
Branigan, Holly P., Pickering, Martin J. & Cleland, Alexandra A.. 1999. Syntactic priming in written production: Evidence for rapid decay. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 6, 633640.
Bresnan, Joan, Cueni, Anna, Nikitina, Tatiana & Baayen, R. Harald. 2007. Predicting the dative alternation. In Bouma, Gerlof, Krämer, Irene & Zwarts, Joost (eds.), Cognitive foundations of interpretation, 6994. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The evolution of grammar. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Cheung, Lawrence & Zhang, Longtu. 2016. Determinants of the synthetic: Analytic variation across English comparatives and superlatives. English Language & Linguistics 20, 559583.
Clogg, Clifford C., Petkova, Eva & Haritou, Adamantios. 1995. Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American Journal of Sociology 100, 12611293.
Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crawford, William J. 2009. The mandative subjunctive. In Rohdenburg, Günter & Schlüter, Julia (eds.), One language, two grammars? Differences between British and American English, 257276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Curzan, Anne. 2003. Gender shifts in the history of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Donahue, Mavis. 1986. Phonological constraints on the emergence of two-word utterances. Journal of Child Language 13, 209218.
Erdmann, Peter. 1981. Der Konjunktiv im britischen und amerikanischen Englisch. In Kunsmann, Peter & Kuhn, Ortwin (eds.), Weltsprache Englisch in Forschung und Lehre, 110131. Berlin: Schmidt.
Ferreira, Fernanda. 1991. Effects of length and syntactic complexity on initiation times for prepared utterances. Journal of Memory and Language 30, 210233.
Ferreira, Victor S. 2003. The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying that is not saying that at all. Journal of Memory and Language 48, 379398.
Futrell, Richard, Mahowald, Kyle & Gibson, Edwin. 2015. Large-scale evidence of dependency length minimization in 37 languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 1033610341.
Gibson, Edward. 2000. The Dependency Locality Theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Marantz, Alec, Miyashita, Yasushi & O’Neil, Wayne (eds.), Image, language, brain, 95126. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gildea, Daniel & Temperley, David. 2010. Do grammars minimize dependency length? Cognitive Science 34, 286310.
Gillespie, Maureen & Perlmutter, Neal J.. 2011. Hierarchy and scope of planning in subject–verb agreement production. Cognition 118, 377397.
Givón, Talmy. 1994. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Greenbaum, Sidney & Quirk, Randolph. 1990. A student’s grammar of the English language. Harlow: Longman.
Gries, Stefan Th. 2002. Preposition stranding in English: Predicting speakers’ behaviour. In Samiian, Vida (ed.), Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics, vol. XII (WECOL 12), 230241. Fresno, CA: Department of Linguistics, California State University.
Gries, Stefan Th. 2003. Multifactorial analysis in corpus linguistics: A study of particle placement. London: Continuum.
Gries, Stefan Th. 2005. Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34, 365399.
Gries, Stefan Th. & Hilpert, Martin. 2010. Modeling diachronic change in the third person singular: A multifactorial, verb- and author-specific exploratory approach. English Language & Linguistics 14, 293320.
Gurevich, Olga, Johnson, Matthew A. & Goldberg, Adele E.. 2010. Incidental verbatim memory for language. Language and Cognition 2, 4578.
Hanson, Gunnar Ólafur. 2010. Consonant harmony: Long-distance interaction in phonology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2011. The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica 45, 3180.
Hawkins, John A. 1994. A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hawkins, John A. 1999. The relative order of prepositional phrases in English: Going beyond manner-place-time. Language Variation and Change 11, 231266.
Hawkins, John A. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hay, Jennifer. 2001. Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative? Linguistics 39, 10411070.
Hilpert, Martin. 2008. The English comparative: Language structure and language use. English Language & Linguistics 12, 395417.
Hinrichs, Lars, Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Bohmann, Axel. 2015. Which-hunting and the Standard English relative clause. Language 91, 806836.
Hoffmann, Sebastian. 1997. Mandative sentences: A study of variation on the basis of the British National Corpus. MA thesis, University of Zurich.
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2011. Preposition placement in English: A usage-based approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Horn, George M. 1986. The minimal distance principle revisited. In Kastovsky, Dieter & Szwedek, Aleksander (eds.), Linguistics across historical and geographical boundaries, vol. 2, 909934. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Content clauses and reported speech. In Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum et al. The Cambridge grammar of the English language, 947–1030. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hundt, Marianne. 1998a. It is important that this study (should) bebased on the analysis of parallel corpora: On the use of the mandative subjunctive in four major varieties of English. In Lindquist, Hans, Klintberg, Staffan, Levin, Magnus & Estling, Maria (eds.), The major varieties of English, 159175. Växjö: Acta Wexioniensia.
Hundt, Marianne. 1998b. New Zealand English grammar: Fact or fiction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hundt, Marianne & Gardner, Anne-Christine. 2017. Corpus-based approaches: Watching English change. In Brinton, Laurel (ed.), English historical linguistics, 96130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hundt, Marianne, Hoffmann, Sebastian & Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2012. The hypothetical subjunctive in South Asian Englishes. English World-Wide 33, 147164.
Jaeger, T. Florian & Snider, Neal. 2008. Implicit learning and syntactic persistence: Surprisal and cumulativity. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 10611066.
Jeschull, Liane. 2004. Coordination in Chechen. In Haspelmath, Martin (ed.), Coordinating constructions, 241265. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Johansson, Stig & Norheim, Else Helene. 1988. The subjunctive in British and American English. ICAME Journal 12, 2736.
Kaisse, Ellen. 2017. The domain of stress assignment: Word-boundedness and frequent collocation. In Bowern, Claire, Horn, Lawrence & Zanuttini, Raffaela (eds.), On looking into words (and beyond), 1740. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Kastronic, Laura & Poplack, Shana. 2014. The (North) American English mandative subjunctive in the 21st century: Revival or remnant? University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20.2, Article 9. http://www.sociolinguistics.uottawa.ca/shanapoplack/pubs/articles/KastronicPoplack2014.pdf (accessed 21 March 2019).
Klein, Barbara. 2009. Ongoing grammatical change in spoken British English: Real-time studies based on the DCPSE. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 34, 2948.
Köpcke, Klaus-Michael, Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Zubin, David. 2009. Motivating grammatical and conceptual agreement in German. In Schmid, Hans-Jörg & Handl, Susanne (eds.), Cognitive foundations of linguistic usage patterns, 171194. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Leech, Geoffrey & Culpeper, Jonathan. 1997. The comparison of adjectives in recent British English. In Nevalainen, Terttu & Kahlas-Tarkka, Leena (eds.), To explain the present: Studies in the changing English language in honour of Matti Rissanen, 353373. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas. 2009. Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leko, Nedžad. 2000. Syntactic vs. semantic agreement in the Oslo Corpus of Bosnian texts. In King, Tracy Holloway & Sekerina, Irina A. (eds.), Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 8: The Philadelphia Meeting 1999, 259278. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Levin, Magnus. 1998. On concord with collective nouns in English. In Renouf, Antoinette (ed.), Explorations in corpus linguistics, 99112. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Levin, Magnus. 2001. Agreement with collective nouns in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Lindquist, Hans. 2000. Livelieror more lively? Syntactic and contextual factors influencing the comparison of disyllabic adjectives. In Kirk, John M. (ed.), Corpora galore: Analyses and techniques in describing English, 125132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lohmann, Arne & Takada, Tayo. 2014. Order in NP conjuncts in spoken English and Japanese. Lingua 152, 4864.
Lohse, Barbara, Hawkins, John A. & Wasow, Thomas. 2004. Domain minimization in English verb–particle constructions. Language 80, 238261.
Marslen-Wilson, William, Tyler, Lorraine K., Waksler, Rochelle & Older, Lianne. 1994. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review 101, 333.
Moessner, Lilo. 2007. The mandative subjunctive in Middle English. In Mazzon, Gabriela (ed.), Studies in Middle English forms and meanings, 209226. Frankfurt a.M.: Lang.
Mondorf, Britta. 2009. More support for more-support. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Morgan, James L. 1972. Verb agreement as a rule of English. In Peranteau, Paul M., Levi, Judith N. & Phares, Gloria C. (eds.), Papers from the 8th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 8), 278286. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Övergaard, Gerd. 1995. The mandative subjunctive in American and British English in the 20th century. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Pérez-Guerra, Javier. 2016. Do you investigate word order in detail or do you investigate in detail word order? On word order and headedness in the recent history of English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12, 103128.
Peters, Pam. 2009. The mandative subjunctive in spoken English. In Peters, Pam, Collins, Peter & Smith, Adam (eds.), Comparative studies in Australian and New Zealand English, 125137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pietsch, Lukas. 2005. Variable grammars: Verbal agreement in northern dialects of English. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Plank, Frans. 1985. Die Ordnung der Personen. Folia Linguistica 19, 111176.
Poplack, Shana. 1992. The inherent variability of the French subjunctive. In Laeufer, Christiane & Morgan, Terrell A. (eds.), Theoretical analyses in Romance linguistics, 235263. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Poplack, Shana, Lealess, Allison & Dion, Nathalie. 2013. The evolving grammar of the French subjunctive. Probus 25, 139195.
R Development Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://cran.r-project.org/.
Reitter, David, Moore, Johanna D. & Keller, Frank. 2006. Priming of syntactic rules in task-oriented dialogue and spontaneous conversation. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 16.
Roelofs, Ardi. 2002. Syllable structure effects turn out to be word length effects: Comment on Santiago et al. (2000). Language and Cognitive Processes 17, 113.
Rohdenburg, Günter. 1996. Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 7, 149182.
Rohdenburg, Günter. 1999. Clausal complementation and cognitive complexity in English. In Neumann, Fritz-Wilhelm & Schülting, Sabine (eds.), Anglistentag 1998, 101112. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
Rohdenburg, Günter. 2018. The use of optional complement markers in present-day English. In Kaunisto, Mark, Höglund, Mikko & Rickman, Paul (eds.), Changing structures: Studies in construction and complementation, 129149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rose, Sharon & Walker, Rachel. 2004. A typology of consonant agreement as correspondence. Language 80, 475531.
Rosemeyer, Malte & Schwenter, Scott A.. 2017. Entrenchment and persistence in language change: The Spanish past subjunctive. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 13, 138.
Rosenbaum, Peter S. 1970. A principle governing deletion in English sentential complementation. In Jacobs, Roderick A. & Rosenbaum, Peter S. (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 2029. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
Ruohonen, Juko. 2018. 21st-century trends in BrE mandative constructions: A statistical multivariate analysis. Presented at the 5th Conference of the International Society for the Linguistics of English, London.
Sachs, Jacqueline S. 1967. Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception & Psychophysics 2, 437442.
Santiago, Julio, MacKay, Donald G. & Palma, Alfonso. 2002. Length effects turn out to be syllable structure effects: Response to Roelofs (2002). Language and Cognitive Processes 17, 1529.
Santiago, Julio, MacKay, Donald G., Palma, Alfonso & Rho, Christine. 2000. Sequential activation processes in producing words and syllables: Evidence from picture naming. Language and Cognitive Processes 15, 144.
Schlüter, Julia. 2009. The conditional subjunctive. In Rohdenburg, Günter & Schlüter, Julia (eds.), One language, two grammars? Differences between British and American English, 277305. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schneider, Edgar W. 2005. The subjunctive in Philippine English. In Dayag, Danilo T. & Quakenbush, J. Stephen (eds.), Linguistics and language education in the Philippines and beyond, 2740. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
Serpollet, Noelle. 2001. The mandative subjunctivein British English seems to be alive and kicking…Is this due to the influence of American English? In Rayson, Paul, Wilson, Andrew, McEnery, Tony, Hardie, Andrew & Khoja, Shereen (eds.), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2001 Conference, 531542. Lancaster: University Centre for Computer Corpus Research on Language.
Sridhar, Shikaripur N. 1990. Kannada. London: Routledge.
Stassen, Leon. 1997. Intransitive predication. Oxford: Clarendon.
Stoel-Gammon, Carol & Stemberger, Joseph P.. 1994. Consonant harmony and phonological underspecification in child speech. In Yavas, Mehmet (ed.), First and second language phonology, 6380. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing.
Sullivan, Keren. 2013. Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Swinney, David A. 1979. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18, 645659.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt M. 2004. On operationalizing syntactic complexity. In Purnelle, Gérard, Fairon, Cédrick & Dister, Anne (eds.), Le poids des mots, 10321039. Louvain-La-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt M. 2006. Morphosyntactic persistence in spoken English: A corpus study at the intersection of variationist sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, and discourse analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt M., Grafmiller, Jason, Heller, Benedikt & Röthlisberger, Melanie. 2016. Around the world in three alternations: Modeling syntactic variation in varieties of English. English World-Wide 27, 109137.
Tarallo, Fernando. 1986. Functional and structural properties in a variable system. In Sankoff, David (ed.), Diversity and diachrony, 249260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thompson, Sandra A. 1988. A discourse approach to the cross-linguistic category ‘adjective’. In Hawkins, John A. (ed.), Explaining language universals, 167185. London: Blackwell.
Thurmair, Maria. 2006. Das Modell und ihr Prinz. Kongruenz und Texteinbettung bei Genus-Sexus-Divergenz. Deutsche Sprache 34, 191220.
Trotta, Joe. 2000. Wh-clauses in English: Aspects of theory and description. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
van der Hulst, Harry & van der Weijer, Jeroen. 1995. Vowel harmony. In Goldsmith, John (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 495534. Oxford: Blackwell.
Vigliocco, Gabriella & Nicol, Janet. 1998. Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production: Is proximity concord syntactic or linear? Cognition 68, B13B29.
Vlasova, Olga. 2010. The mandative subjunctive in American English. MA thesis, University of Oslo.
Waller, Tim. 2017. The subjunctive in present-day English. Ph.D. thesis, University College London.
Wasow, Thomas. 1997. Remarks on grammatical weight. Language Variation and Change 9, 81105.
Wasow, Thomas & Arnold, Jennifer. 2003. Post-verbal constituent ordering in English. In Rohdenburg, Günter & Mondorf, Britta (eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation in English, 119154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wiechmann, Daniel & Lohmann, Arne. 2013. Domain minimization and beyond: Modelling prepositional phrase ordering. Language Variation and Change 25, 6588.
Yaruss, J. Scott. 1999. Utterance length, syntactic complexity, and childhood stuttering. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42, 329344.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0022-2267
  • EISSN: 1469-7742
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

A correction has been issued for this article: