Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T15:27:30.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on ‘rank’ and ‘delicacy’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

John Anderson
John Anderson
Affiliation:
Department of English Language, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh 8
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , April 1969 , pp. 129 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. M. (1968). Ergative and nominative in English. JL 4. 1–32.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. M. (forthcoming a). Some proposals concerning the modal verb in English.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. M. (forthcoming b). On the status of ‘lexical formatives’. FL 4 (1968).Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1963). Linguistic Science and Logic. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1961). Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17. 241–292.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1964). Syntax and the consumer. MSLL 17. 11–24.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1966 a). Some notes on ‘deep’ grammar. JL 2. 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1966 b). The concept of rank: a reply. JL 2. 110–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1966). Language, mathematics and linguistics. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics, III: Theoretical Foundations, 155–304. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. D. (1965). Rank and depth. Lg 41. 574–586.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. A. (1967). Constituency in a systemic description of the English clause. Lingua 18. 225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J. (1966). Contribution to General Discussion. In Lyons, J. & Wales, R. J. (eds.), Psycholinguistics Papers, 129–132. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. (1966). The concept of rank in ‘Neo-Firthian’ grammar. JL 2. 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postal, P. M. (1964). Constituent Structure: A Study of Contemporary Models of Syntactic Description. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Postal, P. M. (1966). On so-called ‘pronouns’ in English. MSLL 19. 177–206.Google Scholar
Regamey, C. (1946–1947). Considérations sur le système morphologique du tibétain littéraire. CFS 6. 26–46.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1966). Explorations in semantic theory. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics, III: Theoretical Foundations, 395–477. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar