Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T12:28:08.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Minimality Condition in phonology1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Monik Charette
Monik Charette
Affiliation:
McGill University and School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

With a few honourable exceptions, phonologists have, until recently, generally assumed the phonological component to be organized along completely different lines from the other components of the grammar. Phonological phenomena were mainly viewed as accidental, language specific, and unprincipled. Whereas some theoretical parallels between syntax and phonology have been drawn (cf. the role of the cycle in both domains and the extensive literature on ordering), there have been few attempts to see if principles of Universal Grammar could be found in phonology as well as in syntax and semantics. Increasingly, however, phonology is now being regarded as a system of principles along with parameters defining the class of human phonological Systems. In such a framework there are no rules of the sort: A → B/C→D. Phonological phenomena result from principles and parameters governing phonological representations and structures present in a particular language. Along these lines, recent work in phonology has suggested that Phonological Form (PF), like the other components of the grammar, is subject to certain fundamental principles. For example, it was proposed by Andersen and Jones in the early 1970s (and pursued by Ewen, Durand and others) that the relations of dependency that determine how syntactic constituents are organized, also determine how segments are grouped together in a given structure. For their part Lowenstamm & Kaye (1982) proposed that a theory of government could account for certain phonological processes such as vowel shortening in closed syllables. Stephen Anderson (1982) and Levin (1985) have proposed that X-bar principles govern the representation of syllables. Specifically, they have proposed that the Rhyme and the syllable as a whole are projections of the syllabic head, the Nucleus.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , March 1989 , pp. 159 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. & Ewen, C. (1987). Principles of dependency phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, S. (1982). The analysis of French schwa: or, how to get something from nothing. Lg 58. 534–573.Google Scholar
Belletti, A. & Rizzi, L. (1981). The syntax of ne: some theoretical implications. The Linguistic Review 1. 117–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charette, M. (1985). The appendix in parametric phonology. In Schuh, R. (ed.) Studies in African Linguistics, supp. 9, UCLA.Google Scholar
Charette, M. (1986). On leveling asymmetry in the consonantal System of Wolof. Ms. McGill University.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1982). Compensatory lengthening and consonant gemination in Luganda. Paper presented at the Minifestival on compensatory lengthening, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1986). Compensatory lengthening and consonant gemination in Luganda. In Wetzels, L. & Sezer, E. (eds).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, C. (1987). Processus harmoniques en pulaar. Mémoire de maîtrise, UQAM.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Vergnaud, J. R. (1980). Three-dimensional phonology. Journal of Linguistic Research 1. 83–105.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1981). A metrical theory of stress rules. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1986). Inalterability in CV phonology. Lg 62. 321–351.Google Scholar
Jeong, B. (1987). Umlaut en Coréen. Ms. Paris 7.Google Scholar
Kaisse, E. M. (1985). Connected speech: the interaction of syntax and phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. D. (1985). On the syllable structure of certain West African languages. In Goyvaerts, D. (ed.), African linguistics: Essays in memory of M. W. K. Semikenke. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, J. D. (1987). Phonological government: the case of Moroccan Arabic. Ms. UQAM.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. D. & Lowenstamm, J. (1984). De la syllabicité. In Dell, F., Hirst, D. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (eds), Forme sonore du langage. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. D. & Lowenstamm, J. (1985). A metrical treatment of Grassmann's law. Proceedings of the 15th NELS Conference. University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. D., Lowenstamm, J. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (1985). The internal structure of phonological elements: a theory of Charm and Government. Phonology Yearbook 2. 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, J. D., Lowenstamm, J. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (to appear). Constituent structure and phonological government. To appear in Linguistischer Berichte.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. S. (1984). Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, R. D. (1969). Historial linguistics and generative grammar. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1965). Phonological change. Unpublished dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1968). Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. T. (eds), Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston. 171–202.Google Scholar
Levin, J. (1985). A metrical theory of syllabicity. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, J. & Kaye, J. D. (1982). Compensatory lengthening in Tiberian Hebrew. Paper presented at the Minifestival on Compensatory Lengthening, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, J. & Kaye, J. D. (1986). Compensatory lengthening in Tiberian Hebrew. In Wetzels, L. & Sezer, E. (eds), Studies in Compensatory lengthening. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Nieves, R. (1987). Consonant assimilation in Spanish of Cordoba. Ms. Paris 7.Google Scholar
Paradis, C. (1986). Phonologie et morphologie lexicales: les classes nominales en pulaar (Fula). Unpublished PhD dissertation, Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Piggott, B. L. & Singh, R. (1985). The phonology of epenthetic segments. Revue Canadienne de Linguistique. 415–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prunet, J. F. (1986). Spreading and locality domains in phonology. PhD dissertation. McGill University.Google Scholar
Prunet, J. F. & Tellier, C. (1984). Autonomie des niveaux et gouvernement en phonologie: l'abrègement vocalique en pulaar. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics. McGill University.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (1983). Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Reuland, E. (1983). Governing -ing. LIn 14. 101–136.Google Scholar
Rouveret, A. & Vergnaud, J. R. (1980). Specifying reference to the subject: French causatives and conditions on representations. LIn 11. 97–202.Google Scholar
Schein, B. & Steriade, D. (1986). On geminates. LIn 17. 691–744.Google Scholar
Stowell, T. (1981). Origins of Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Wetzels, L. & Sezer, E. (eds) (1986). Studies in Compensatory lengthening. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar