Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T17:46:56.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Like subject verbs and causal clauses in English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Janet Dean Fodor
Janet Dean Fodor
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Perlmutter claimed (Perlmutter, 1968) that the like subject constraint in English is a deep structure constraint. Apart from being a contribution to a theory of filtering devices in natural languages, this claim is of interest because it is based on the assignment of abstract deep structures containing causal clauses which do not appear in surface structure. For example, Perlmutter proposed deriving the sentence:

(1) ( = (7)) I tried to be arrested.

from the deep structures:

rather than from the more conservative:

(3) ( = (9)) I tried [Pro arrest I]

Like other proposed abstract deep structures, (2) brings out the meaning of the sentence; it predicts paraphrase relations between (1) and the sentences:

Perlmutter presented independent evidence for this analysis, but he also used it to explain away what would otherwise have been counterexample to the claim that the like subject constraint holds over deep structures (the ‘deep subject hypothesis’).

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , March 1974 , pp. 95 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. T. (eds), Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Fischer, S. D. & Marshall, B. (1969). The examination and abandonment of the theory of begin of D. M. Perlmutter. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1965). On the nature of syntactic irregularity. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University. Published as Irregularity in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 1971.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1968). Instrumental adverbs and the concept of deep structure. FL 4. 4–29.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J. (1969). The underlying structure of the begin-class verbs. In Binnick, R. I. et al. (eds), Papers front the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. M. (1968). Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, M.I.T.Google Scholar
Postal, P. M. (1971a). iTough Movement Si, Tough Deletion No!. Lin 2. No. 4.Google Scholar
Postal, P. M. (1971b). Crossover phenomena. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar