Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T11:06:17.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Joseph Aoun, A grammar of anaphora. (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs, 11.) Cambridge, Mass, and London: MIT Press, 1985. Pp. 190.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Christopher Lyons
Christopher Lyons
Affiliation:
University of Salford.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , March 1987 , pp. 231 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aoun, J. (1981). The formal nature of anaphoric relations. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Aoun, J. (1986). Generalized binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Belletti, A. (1982). On the anaphoric status of the reciprocal constructions in Italian. The Linguistic Review 2. 101–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borer, H. (1984). Parametric syntax: case studies in Semitic and Romance languages. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Bouchard, D. (1984). On the content of empty categories. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1982). Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, Mass. & London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Finer, D. L. (1985). The syntax of switch-reference. LIn 16. 35–55.Google Scholar
Koster, J. (1978). Locality principles in syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, T. (1983). Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London & Canberra: Croom Helm.Google Scholar