Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T05:42:05.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paradigm economy: a reply to Nyman

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Andrew Carstairs
Andrew Carstairs
Affiliation:
Department of English Language and Literature, University of Canterbury, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , September 1988 , pp. 489 - 499
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aitchison, J. (1981). Language change: progress or decay? London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Bynon, T. (1977). Historical linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carstairs, A. (1983). Paradigm economy. JL 19. 115–128.Google Scholar
Carstairs, A. (1984a). Paradigm economy in the Latin third declension. TPhS 113–137.Google Scholar
Carstairs, A. (1984b). Constraints on allomorphy in inflexion. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Carstairs, A. (1984c). Inflexional complexity in relation to phonology. Te Reo 27. 29–46.Google Scholar
Carstairs, A. (1985a). Paradigm economy in Latin nouns. In Fisiak J. (ed.), Papers from the 6th International Conference on Historical Linguistics.Amsterdam/Poznan:John Benjamins/Adam Mickiewicz University. 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carstairs, A. (1985b). Review of Wurzel (1984). JL 21. 487–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carstairs, A. (1986). Macroclasses and paradigm economy in German nouns. ZPSK 39. 3–11.Google Scholar
Carstairs, A. (1987). Allomorphy in inflexion. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Carstairs, A. (1988). Nonconcatenative inflection and paradigm economy. In Hammond, M. T. & Noonan, M. (eds), Theoretical morphology. San Diego: Academic Press. 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U. (1985). Morphonology. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Hale, K. (1973). Deep-surface canonical disparities in relation to language change: an Australian example. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), Current trends in linguistics, vol. 11. The Hague: Mouton. 401–458.Google Scholar
Hooper, J. Bybee (1976). An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M. (1975). Phonology: theory and analysis. New York: Holt Rinehart.Google Scholar
Itkonen, E. (1983). Causality in linguistic theory. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, M. & Kisseberth, C. (1979). Generative phonology: description and theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1984). Phonology. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (1979). Principles ofdiachronic syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Mayerthaler, W. (1981). Morphologische Natürlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.Google Scholar
Meillet, A. (1906). Confusion des thèmes en -i- avec les autres thèmes consonantiques. In De quelques innovations de la déclinaison latine. Paris: Klincksieck. 27–44.Google Scholar
Niedermann, M. (1953). Historische Lautlehre des Lateinischen, 3rd ed.Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Nyman, M. (1987). Is the Paradigm Economy Principle relevant? JL 23. 251–267.Google Scholar
Plank, F. (1980). Encoding grammatical relations: acceptable and unacceptable non-distinctness. In Fisiak, J. (ed.), Historical Morphology. The Hague: Mouton. 289–325.Google Scholar
Wurzel, W. U. (1984). Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar