Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T13:33:37.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Charles Jones, A history of English phonology. London & New York: Longman Linguistics Library, 1989, Pp. xi + 318.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Donka Minkova
Donka Minkova
Affiliation:
Department of English, UCLA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , September 1991 , pp. 542 - 550
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. (1986). Suprasegmental dependencies. In Durand, J. (ed.) Dependency and nonlinear phonology. London: Croom Helm. 55–135.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. & Durand, J. (1986). Dependency phonology. In Durand, J. (ed.) Dependency and non-linear phonology. London: Croom Helm. 1–54.Google Scholar
Bliss, A. J. (1952–1953). Vowel quantity in Middle English borrowings from Anglo-Norman. In Lass, R.. (ed.), (1969) Approaches to English historical linguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 164–207.Google Scholar
Luick, K. (1964). Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache. Stuttgart: Bernhard Tauchnitz.Google Scholar
Minkova, D. (1982). The environment for Open Syllable Lengthening in Middle English. Folia Linguistica Historica 3(1). 29–58.Google Scholar
Minkova, D. & Stockwell, R. P. (forthcoming). Homorganic clusters as moric busters in the history of English: the case of -ld, -nd, -mb. In Rissanen, M. et al. (eds) Papers from the sixth international conference on English historical linguistics, Helsinki, May 1990.Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Samuels, M. L. (1952). The study of Old English phonology. Transactions of the Philological Society 50. 15–47.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. P. (1985). Assessment of alternative explanations of the Middle English phenomenon or high vowel lowering when lengthened in the open syllable. In Eaton, R., Fischer O., Koopman, W. & van der Leek, F. (eds) Papers from the fourth international conference on English historical linguistics.Amsterdam:John Benjamins. 303–319.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. P. & Barritt, C. (1951). Some Old English graphemic-phonemic correspondences: æ, ea, e. Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers. 4.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. & Minkova, D. (1988). The English vowel shift: problems of coherence and explanation. In Kastovsky, D. & Bauer, G. (eds) Luick revisited. Tübingen: Gunter Narr. 355–394.Google Scholar