Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T13:53:52.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reviews in Medical Ethics: One Goal? One Consensus? One More Trip to the Drawing Board: A Review of Global Bioethics: The Collapse of Consensus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Andrea Ott
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
JLME Column
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , Winter 2007 , pp. 748 - 750
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Researchers have found that the life span in Japan is roughly 80 years while a mere 40 years in Malawi. See Dwyer, J., “Teaching Global Bioethics,” Bioethics 17, no. 5/6 (October 2003): 432–46, available at <http://ssrn.com/abstract=452745> (last visited October 3, 2007). Furthermore, Blackwell publishes a journal entitled Developing World Bioethics. Clearly, what was once a sub-specialty within bioethics is now mainstream.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See, e.g., Kass, N. Dawson, L. Loyo-Berrios, N. I., “Ethical Oversight of Research in Developing Countries,” IRB: Ethics & Human Research 25, no. 2 (March-April 2003): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tristram Engelhardt, H. Jr., ed., Global Bioethics: The Collapse of Consensus (Salem, MA: M&M Scrivener Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Favorite targets of the authors are the Oviedo Bioethics Convention and the UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) Declaration.Google Scholar
See Engelhardt, Jr., supra note 3, at 20.Google Scholar
Id., at 41.Google Scholar
Delkeskamp-Hayes, C., “Implementing Health Care Rights Versus Imposing Health Care Cultures: The Limits of Tolerance, Kant's Rationality, and the Moral Pitfalls of International Bioethics Standardization,” in Engelhardt, Jr., ed., supra note 3, at 50.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals, Patton, H. J., trans. (New York: Harper & Row, 1964): At 89–90.Google Scholar
Capaldi, N., “Manifesto: Moral Diversity in Health Care Ethics,” in Engelhardt, Jr., ed., supra note 3, at 131.Google Scholar
Id., at 135.Google Scholar
Boyle, J., “The Bioethics of Global Biomedicine: A Natural Law Reflection,” in Engelhardt, Jr., ed., supra note 3, at 300.Google Scholar
Id., at 300.Google Scholar
Id., at 301.Google Scholar
Id., at 302.Google Scholar
Id., at 325.Google Scholar
Id., at 302.Google Scholar
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, General Assembly Resolution 217 A (III), adopted December 10, 1948.Google Scholar
Solomon, D., “Domestic Disarray and Imperial Ambition: Contemporary Applied Ethics and the Prospects for Global Bioethics,” in Engelhardt, Jr., ed., supra note 3, at 335.Google Scholar
See Engelhardt, Jr., supra note 3, at 41.Google Scholar