Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T19:41:29.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interpersonal Violence and Public Policy: What about the Victims?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Extract

Violence is an extremely prevalent problem in the United States and throughout the world, and it is a major contributing factor to increased mortality and mortalityty. These facts are well documented in the recent Report on violence and Health published by the World Health Organization. This report, which is likely to become a landmark document in the public health community, defines violence broadly as: The intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, that either results in or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, maldevelopment or deprivation. This World Health Organization definition encompasses three types of violence: 1) suicide and selfharm, 2) collective violence, and 3) interpersonal violence.

Interpersonal violence is defined asviolence inflicted by an individual or small group of individuals and includes youth violence, violence between intimate partners, other forms of family violence such as abuse of children and the elderly, rape and sexual assault by strangers, and violence in institutional settings such as schools, workplaces, nursing homes and prisons.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

World Health Organization, Report on Violence and Health: A Summary, at <http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/media/en/559.pdf> (last visited September 29, 2003).+(last+visited+September+29,+2003).>Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, D.G., “What Is Violence Against Women: Defining and Measuring the Problem, Journal of Interpersonal Violence (in press).Google Scholar
Rantala, R., Effects of NIBRS on Crime Statistics, Special Report, NCJ178890, (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2000).Google Scholar
Saltzman, L.E. Fanslow, J.L. McMahon, P.M. Shelley, G.A., Intimate Partner Violence Surveillance: Uniform Definitions and Recommended Data Elements, Version 1.0 (Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 2000).Google Scholar
See World Health Organization supra note 1 at 15.Google Scholar
See Saltzman, supra note 6.Google Scholar
Keane, T. Gerrity, E. Tuma, F., eds., Mental Health Consequences of Torture (New York: Kluwer Publishing, 2001): 317331 at 317.Google Scholar
Id. at 318.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, D.G. Acierno, R.E., “Mental Health Needs of Crime Victims: EpIdemiology and Outcomes,” Journal of Traumatic Stress 16, no. 2 (2003): 119132 at 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnick, H.S. Acierno, R. Kilpatrick, D.G., “Health Impact of Interpersonal Violence: Section II: Medical and Mental Health Outcomes,” Behavioral Medicine 23, no. 2 (1997): 6578 at 65;Schnurr, P. Green, B., ends,Trauma and Health: Physical Health Consequences of Exposure to Extreme Stress. (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Costs of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in the United States. (Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2003): 12 at 2.Google Scholar
PresIdent’s Task Force on Victims of Crime, Final Report (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1982): at 16.Google Scholar
Id. at 118.Google Scholar
Caspi, A. McClay, J. Moffitt, T.E. et al. , “Role of Genotype in the Cycle of Violence in Maltreated Children.” Science 297 (2002): 851854 at 851;Widom, C. S., “The Cycle of Violence,”Science 244 (1989): 160–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Kilpatrick supra note 4; See World Health Organization supra note 1.Google Scholar
Freedy, J.R. Hobfoll, S.E., eds., Traumatic Stress From Theory to Practice (New York: Plenum Press, 1995): 129161 at 151.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, D.G. Seymour, A.K. Boyle, J., America Speaks Out: Citizens Attitudes About Victims’ Rights and Violence (Arlington, VA: National Victim Center, 1991).Google Scholar
McCall, G.J., “Risk Factors and Sexual Assault Prevention,” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 8 (1993); at 223–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, A.J. Roth, J.A., Understanding and Preventing Violence (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1993).Google Scholar
See Freedy supra note 19 at 152.Google Scholar
Zawitz, M.W., ed. Report to the Nation on Crime and Justice, 2nd ed. (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, 1988).Google Scholar
Davis, R.C. Lurigio, A.J. Skogan, W.G. eds. Victims of Crime 2nd ed. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997): At 232.Google Scholar
Office of the Surgeon General, U.S. Surgeon General’s Workshop on Violence and Public Health (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1995).Google Scholar
See World Health Organization supra note 1 Rosenberg, M.L. Mercy, J.A., eds. Violence in America (New York:Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
See Freedy supra note 19 at 153.Google Scholar
See World Health Organization supra note 1 at 31–34.Google Scholar
See National Center for Injury Prevention in Control supra note 14 at 48; See World Health Organization supra note 1 at 35.Google Scholar
See World Health Organization supra note 1.Google Scholar
See Davis, R.C. Lurigio, A.J. Skogan, W.G. supra note 29 at 183.Google Scholar
Id at 231;See Keane, T. Gerrity, E. Tuma, F., eds. supra note 10 at 319; See Davis, R.C. Lurigio, A.J. Skogan, W.G. supra note 29 at 195.Google Scholar
Id at 195.Google Scholar
See PresIdent’s Task Force on Victims of Crime supra note 15 at 5.Google Scholar
Id at 114.Google Scholar
Id at 114.Google Scholar
See Davis, R.C. Lurigio, A.J. Skogan, W.G. supra note 31 at 236 for a discussion of why many criminal justice system officials are reluctant to provIde victims with enforceable rights.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office for Victims of Crime, New Directions from the Field: Victims’ Rights and Services for the 21st Century (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, 1998).Google Scholar
See Davis, R.C. Lurigio, A.J. Skogan, W.G. supra note 31 at 236.Google Scholar
See Keane, T. Gerrity, E. Tuma, F., eds. supra note 9 at 322.Google Scholar
See New Directions supra note 43: 325353 at 330. More information about crime victim’s compensation is provIded in chapter 14 of New Directions.Google Scholar
Urban Institute, The National Evaluation of State Victims of Crime Act Assistance and Compensation Programs: Trends and Strategies for the Future (San Diego, CA: Urban Institute, 2003).Google Scholar
See Kilpatrick, Seymour, Boyle, supra note 22.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice, The Rights of Crime Victims — Does Legal Protection Make a Difference?’(Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, 1998) at 1.Google Scholar
See Davis, R.C. Lurigio, A.J. Skogan, W.G. supra note 29 at 232;See U.S. Department of Justice supra note 51 at 1–2; See New Directions supra note 43 at 8; See Davis, R.C. Lurigio, A.J. Skogan, W.G. supra note 29 at 196.Google Scholar
Id at 232.Google Scholar
Id at 241.Google Scholar
Id at 232.Google Scholar
See U.S. Department of Justice supra note 51 at 3–11 for a summary of project methodology and findings.Google Scholar
See U.S. Department of Justice supra note 51 at 10.Google Scholar
See New Directions supra note 43: 9–12 at 9.Google Scholar
See PresIdent’s Task Force on Victims of Crime supra note 15 at 114 See New Directions supra note 43: at 9.Google Scholar
Id at 210, 234, and 337.Google Scholar
See World Health Organization supra note 31.Google Scholar
Id at 28–29.Google Scholar