Amalgamated Society of Engineers v. Adelaide Steamship Co. Ltd. (1920) 28 CLR 129 and Commonwealth v. Tasmania (1983) 158 CLR 1.Google Scholar

See Australian Government, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) Australia's Health 2014, available at <http://www.aihw.gov.au/australias-health/2014/health-system/> (last visited October 20, 2015). (last visited October 20, 2015).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=See+Australian+Government,+Australian+Institute+of+Health+and+Welfare+(AIHW)+Australia's+Health+2014,+available+at++(last+visited+October+20,+2015).>Google Scholar

S.128 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, 1900.Google Scholar

Id., at S.51 (xxiiiA).Google Scholar

See <http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/work-nras> (last visited October 20, 2015).+(last+visited+October+20,+2015).>Google Scholar

See Australian Government, Department of Human Services, Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) <http://www.medicareaustralia.gov.au/provider/medicare/mbs.jsp> (last visited April 24, 2015).+(last+visited+April+24,+2015).>Google Scholar

See NHMRC, Research Funding Facts Book for 2013, available at <https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/nh167_funding_facts_book_2013.pdf> (last visited October 20, 2015).+(last+visited+October+20,+2015).>Google Scholar

These are figures for 2010 to 2011, available at <http://www.researchaustralia.org/health-medical-research/funding-hmr> (last visited October 20, 2015).+(last+visited+October+20,+2015).>Google Scholar

See Research Australia, “Major Australia Health & Medical Research,” available at <http://www.researchaustralia.org/health-medical-research/major-australian-health-medical-research-achievements> (last visited October 20, 2015).+(last+visited+October+20,+2015).>Google Scholar

See Strategic Review of Health & Medical Research, available at <http://www.mckeonreview.org.au/downloads/Strategic_Review_of_Health_and_Medical_Research_Feb_2013-Summary_Report.pdf> (last visited Feb. 25, 2015).+(last+visited+Feb.+25,+2015).>Google Scholar

See The Virtuous Cycle - Working Together for Health and Medical Research, 2000 available at <https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/nh28> (last visited October 20, 2015).+(last+visited+October+20,+2015).>Google Scholar

Chalmers, D. Nicolm, D., “Human Genetic Research Databases and Biobanks -Towards Uniform Terminology and Australian Best Practice,” Journal of Law and Medicine 15, no. 4 (2008): 538–554.Google Scholar

Green, E. D. Guyer, M., “Charting a Course for Genomic Medicine from Base Pairs to Bedside,” Nature 470, no. 7333 (2011): 204–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greely, H. quoted in Longtin, R. “Canadian Province Seeks Control of Its Genes,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute 96, no. 21 (2004): 1567–1569.Google Scholar

See ABNA, available at <http://abna.org.au/> (last visited October 20, 2015).+(last+visited+October+20,+2015).>Google Scholar

The Australian Biospecimen Network provides a list of links to Australasian biobanks at <http://abrn.net/contact/links/> (last visited October 20, 2015): Australian Ovarian Cancer Study; Australian Brain Bank Network; Australian Breast Cancer Tissue Bank-NSW; Australasian Leukaemia & Lymphoma Group; Queensland Institute Medical Research Cell Line Bank; Brisbane Breast Bank; Australian Leukaemia and Lymphoma TB-QLD; Qld Children's Tumour Bank; Wesley Tissue Bank part of the Wesley Private Hospital-Qld; Australian Prostate Cancer Bioresource (APCC)-Qld; Cart-Wheel; Lifepool; Peter Mac Tissue Bank; Victorian Cancer Biobank (VCB); Australian Brain Bank Network; Australian Breast Cancer Tissue Bank-NSW; Cancer Lifestyle & Evaluation of Risk (CLEAR); New South Wales Pancreatic Cancer Network (NSWPCN); Genetic Repositories Australia; Gynecological Oncology Biobank at Westmead; Paediatric Tissue bank; Cellbank Australia; Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research (formerly Western Australia Institute of Medical Research); Western Australian DNA Bank; Western Australian Research Tissue Network- St. John of God Pathology; Australian Mesothelioma Tissue Bank.+(last+visited+October+20,+2015):+Australian+Ovarian+Cancer+Study;+Australian+Brain+Bank+Network;+Australian+Breast+Cancer+Tissue+Bank-NSW;+Australasian+Leukaemia+&+Lymphoma+Group;+Queensland+Institute+Medical+Research+Cell+Line+Bank;+Brisbane+Breast+Bank;+Australian+Leukaemia+and+Lymphoma+TB-QLD;+Qld+Children's+Tumour+Bank;+Wesley+Tissue+Bank+part+of+the+Wesley+Private+Hospital-Qld;+Australian+Prostate+Cancer+Bioresource+(APCC)-Qld;+Cart-Wheel;+Lifepool;+Peter+Mac+Tissue+Bank;+Victorian+Cancer+Biobank+(VCB);+Australian+Brain+Bank+Network;+Australian+Breast+Cancer+Tissue+Bank-NSW;+Cancer+Lifestyle+&+Evaluation+of+Risk+(CLEAR);+New+South+Wales+Pancreatic+Cancer+Network+(NSWPCN);+Genetic+Repositories+Australia;+Gynecological+Oncology+Biobank+at+Westmead;+Paediatric+Tissue+bank;+Cellbank+Australia;+Harry+Perkins+Institute+of+Medical+Research+(formerly+Western+Australia+Institute+of+Medical+Research);+Western+Australian+DNA+Bank;+Western+Australian+Research+Tissue+Network-+St.+John+of+God+Pathology;+Australian+Mesothelioma+Tissue+Bank.>Google Scholar

COSA Submission to the Cancer Research Leadership Forum on “Towards a National Cancer Research Plan,” April 2012, available at <https://www.cosa.org.au/media/1075/cosa_submission_towards-a-national-cancer-research-plan_april2012.pdf> (last visited October 20, 2015).+(last+visited+October+20,+2015).>Google Scholar

Australasian Biospecimen Network-Oncology (ABN-Onc): (with Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, kConFab, Westmead Children's Hospital, Westmead Gynaecological Oncology Biobank, WARTN, QEII Mesothelioma Bank, the Cell Bank at QIMR and Breast Tissue Bank, QIMR), <www.abrn.net>; <http://www1.petermac.org/allg/NewSite/>; Australian Ovarian Cancer Study (AOCS), <www.aocstudy.org>; Australian Prostate Cancer Consortium (APCC), <www.apccbioresource.org.au>; Australian Breast Cancer Tissue Bank (ABCTB), <www.abctb.org.au>; The Kathleen Cuningham Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer (kConFab), <www.kconfab.org> (all last visited October 20, 2015).; ; Australian Ovarian Cancer Study (AOCS), ; Australian Prostate Cancer Consortium (APCC), ; Australian Breast Cancer Tissue Bank (ABCTB), ; The Kathleen Cuningham Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer (kConFab), (all last visited October 20, 2015).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Australasian+Biospecimen+Network-Oncology+(ABN-Onc):+(with+Peter+MacCallum+Cancer+Centre,+kConFab,+Westmead+Children's+Hospital,+Westmead+Gynaecological+Oncology+Biobank,+WARTN,+QEII+Mesothelioma+Bank,+the+Cell+Bank+at+QIMR+and+Breast+Tissue+Bank,+QIMR),+;+;+Australian+Ovarian+Cancer+Study+(AOCS),+;+Australian+Prostate+Cancer+Consortium+(APCC),+;+Australian+Breast+Cancer+Tissue+Bank+(ABCTB),+;+The+Kathleen+Cuningham+Consortium+for+Research+into+Familial+Breast+Cancer+(kConFab),++(all+last+visited+October+20,+2015).>Google Scholar

NHMRC, Biobanks Information Paper (2010), available at <https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/your_health/egenetics/practioners/biobanks_information_paper.pdf> (last visited October 20, 2015).+(last+visited+October+20,+2015).>Google Scholar

Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research, Strategic Roadmap for Australian Research Infrastructure (2011), available at <http://www.industry.gov.au/science/Documents/2011StrategicRoadmapforAustralianResearchInfrastructure.pdf> (last visited October 20, 2015).+(last+visited+October+20,+2015).>Google Scholar

See list at supra note 18.Google Scholar

The NHMRC Cancer Biobank Working group presented 5 key advantages for a national network applicable not only to a cancer biobank network but that of other diseases: (1) closer interactions with clinicians, surgeons and other health professionals to open the way for Medicare number and/or the electronic medical record to facilitate the linking of clinical information and follow-up data to banked specimens; (2) a common approaches to governance, infrastructure and operational aspects of biobanking, particularly in IT; (3) high quality biospecimens; (4) rapid response for collecting tumour types or specific data; and (5) continuing support for biobanking, training and accreditation/certification.Google Scholar

OECD Council Recommendation on Human Biobanks and Genetic Research Databases October 22, 2009, available at <http://acts.oecd.org/Instruments/ShowInstrumentView.aspx?InstrumentID=218&InstrumentPID=214&Lang=en&Book=> (last visited October 20, 2015).+(last+visited+October+20,+2015).>Google Scholar

Chalmers, D. Nicol, D., “Human Genetic Research Databases and Biobanks: Towards Uniform Terminology and Australian Best Practice,” Journal of Law and Medicine 15, no. 4 (2008): 538–555.Google Scholar

See Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative, available at <https://cpmc.coriell.org/> (last visited October 20, 2015).+(last+visited+October+20,+2015).>Google Scholar

See <http://biospecimens.cancer.gov/programs/cahub/default.asp> (last visited 29 October 2015).+(last+visited+29+October+2015).>Google Scholar

See Early Detection Research Network, available at <http://edrn.nci.nih.gov> (last visited October 20, 2015).+(last+visited+October+20,+2015).>Google Scholar

See <http://cancergenome.nih.gov/> (last visited October 20, 2015).+(last+visited+October+20,+2015).>Google Scholar

See <www.redbiobancos.es> (last visited October 21, 2015).+(last+visited+October+21,+2015).>Google Scholar

See <www.eurobiobank.org> (last visited October 21, 2015).+(last+visited+October+21,+2015).>Google Scholar

See <www.ctrnet.ca/> (last visited October 21, 2015).+(last+visited+October+21,+2015).>Google Scholar

Hudson, T. et al. , “International Network of Cancer Genome Projects,” Nature 464, no. 7291 (2010): 993–998.Google Scholar

Vaught, J. et al. , “Biobankonomics: Developing a Sustainable Business Model Approach for the Formation of a Human Tissue Bank,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monograph no. 42 (2011): 24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See <www.hupo.org/> (last visited October 21, 2015).+(last+visited+October+21,+2015).>Google Scholar

Karapetis, C. et al. , “K-ras Mutations and Benefit from Cetuximab in Advanced Colorectal Cancer,” New England Journal of Medicine 359, no. 17 (2008): 1757–1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See <http://www.p3gconsortium.org/> (P3G motto is “transparency and collaboration”) (last visited October 21, 2015).+(P3G+motto+is+“transparency+and+collaboration”)+(last+visited+October+21,+2015).>Google Scholar

Norwegian Institute of Public Health, “Promoting Harmonisation of Epidemiological Biobanks in Europe,” available at <http://www.fhi.no/artikler/?id=73793> (last visited October 21, 2015).+(last+visited+October+21,+2015).>Google Scholar

The principles of Collection Limitation; Data Quality; Purpose Specification; Use Limitation; Openness; Individual Participation; Accountability.Google Scholar

95/46/EC, see also Directive on Telecommunications privacy (97/66/EC now 2002/58/EC).Google Scholar

See <http://www.oaic.gov.au/privacy/privacy-act/the-privacy-act> (last visited October 21, 2015).+(last+visited+October+21,+2015).>Google Scholar

Combined APP guidelines were published on April 1, 2015; see <https://www.oaic.gov.au/agencies-and-organisations/appguidelines/> (last visited December 14, 2015).+(last+visited+December+14,+2015).>Google Scholar

This legislation goes under a range of titles and can be accessed at <http://www.oaic.gov.au/privacy/other-privacy-jurisdictions/state-and-territory-privacy-law> (last visited October 21, 2015).+(last+visited+October+21,+2015).>Google Scholar

Gibbons, S. M. Kaye, J., “Governing Genetic Databases: Collection, Storage and Use,” King's Law Journal 18, no. 2 (2007): 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

For Your Information: Australian Privacy Law and Practice (ALRC Report 108) recommended that IPPs or NPPs be replaced by model Unified Privacy principles (UPPs). This recommendation was accepted with the nomenclature of Australian Privacy Principles (APPs).Google Scholar

See OECD, OECD Guidelines on Human Biobanks and Genetic Research Databases, available at <http://www.oecd.org/science/biotech/44054609.pdf> (last visited October 21, 2015).+(last+visited+October+21,+2015).>Google Scholar

Australasian Biospecimen Network Biorepository Protocols, 2012, available at <http://abrn.net/what-we-do/protocols/> (last visited October 21, 2015).+(last+visited+October+21,+2015).>Google Scholar

See ISBER, Best Practices for Repositories: Collection, Storage, Retrieval and Distribution of Biological Materials for Research (2011), available at <http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.isber.org/resource/resmgr/Files/ISBER_Best_Practices_3rd_Edi.pdf> (last visited October 21, 2015).+(last+visited+October+21,+2015).>Google Scholar

National Cancer Institute, NCI Best Practices for Biospecimen Resources, updated in 2011, at page 1, available at <http://biospecimens.cancer.gov/bestpractices/2011-NCIBestPractices.pdf> (last visited October 21, 2015).+(last+visited+October+21,+2015).>Google Scholar

The term is not precise, as has been noted by Knoppers, B. M. Saginur, M., “The Babel of Genetic Data Terminology,” Nature Biotechnology 23, no. 8 (2005): 925–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The National Statement states that human tissue samples should always be regarded as, in principle, re-identifiable. See National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council and Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee, National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007).Google Scholar

Milius, D. et al. , “The International Cancer Genome Consortium's Evolving Data-sharing Policies,” Nature Biotechnology 32, no. 6 (2014): 519–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See <http://www.abctb.org.au/abctbNew2/ApplicationProcedures.aspx> (last visited March 2, 2015).+(last+visited+March+2,+2015).>Google Scholar

Chalmers, D. et al. , “Marking Shifts in Human Research Ethics in the Development of Biobanking,” Public Health Ethics (2014).Google Scholar

The National Statement defines “unspecified” consent as “given for the use of data or tissue in any future research,” National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007), Paragraph 2.2.14 (c).Google Scholar

See Otlowski, M. F., “Tackling Legal Challenges Posed by Population Biobanks: Reconceptualising Consent Requirements,” Medical Law Review 20, no. 2 (2012): 191.Google Scholar

Schofield, et al. , “Post-Publication Sharing of Data and Tools,” Nature 461, no. 7261 (2009): 171–173.)Google Scholar

Petherick, A., “Biobanks Look to Software Solutions to Handle Data Deluge,” Nature Medicine 18, no. 7 (2012): 992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stein, L., “The Case for Cloud Computing in Genome Informatics,” Genome Biology 11, no. 5 (2010): 207–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

CHeReL operates in NSW and the ACT, available at <http://www.cherel.org.au/about-us> (last visited October 21, 2015).+(last+visited+October+21,+2015).>Google Scholar

The Australian Privacy Principles were introduced in March 2014 and are: APP 1: Open and transparent management of personal information; APP 2: Anonymity and pseudonymity; APP 3: Collection of solicited personal information; APP 4: Dealing with unsolicited personal information; APP 5: Notification of the collection of personal information; APP 6: Use or disclosure of personal information; APP 7: Direct marketing; APP 8: Cross-border disclosure of personal information; APP 9: Adoption, use or disclosure of government related identifiers; APP 10: Quality of personal information; APP 11: Security of personal information; APP 12: Access to personal information; and, APP 13: Correction of personal information. These APPs replaced the former Information Privacy Principles (IPPs) for the public sector and the National Privacy Principles (NPPs) for the private sector.Google Scholar

In considering this balance, HRECs should to consider matters including: The degree to which the personal information is necessary for the research; the public importance of the research and the likely contribution to the community; any likely benefits to individuals or groups; whether the research could be achieved within the terms of the IPPs and NPPs and the degree to which this would impact on the scientific value of the research; whether the risk of harm to the individual whose personal information is to be used is minimal; the study design and scientific credentials of those involved in the research; whether access to the information is restricted to appropriate personnel; the procedures to be followed to ensure that the information is permanently de-identified before the publication of results; and, the procedures to be followed at the completion of the study to protect or destroy the information.Google Scholar

Wolf, S. M. et al. , “Managing Incidental Findings and Research Results in Genomic Research Involving Biobanks and Archived Data,” Genetics in Medicine 14, no. 4 (2012): 361–384; Wolf, S. M., “The Role of Law in the Debate over Return of Research Results and Incidental Findings: The Challenge of Developing Law for Translational Science,” Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 13, no. 1 (2012): 435–448; Levesque, E. et al. , “Return of Research Results: General Principles and International Perspectives,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39, no. 4 (2011): 583–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, R. C. et al. , “ACMG Recommendations for Reporting of Incidental Findings in Clinical Exome and Genome Sequencing,” Genetics in Medicine 15, no. 7 (2013): 565–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berg, J. S. Khoury, M. J. Evans, J. P., “Deploying Whole Genome Sequencing in Clinical Practice and Public Health: Meeting the Challenge One Bin at a Time,” Genetics in Medicine 13, no. 6 (2011): 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Health Council of the Netherlands, “The ‘Thousand-Dollar Genome’: An Ethical Exploration,” Monitoring Report Ethics and Health 2010/2 (2010): 21.Google Scholar

Essentially Yours: The Protection of Human Genetic Information in Australia Report 96 2003 Recs 18–1 to 18–3 and 14–1 to 14–5. Dr. Francis Collins, then Head, US National Human Genome Research Institute, described the Report as “a truly phenomenal job, placing Australia ahead of what the rest of the world is doing, described this Report,” News release during the XIX International Congress of Genetics Melbourne July 5–9 2003.Google Scholar

National Health and Medical Research Council, Use and Disclosure of Genetic Information to a Patient's Genetic Relative under Section 95AA of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth): Guidelines for Health Practitioners in the Private Sector (October 27, 2009).Google Scholar

Due to jurisdictional issues, these Guidelines are stated to only apply to medical practitioners who work in the private sector: The ALRC/AHEC report Essentially Yours had recommended that States and Territories enact parallel amendments to their privacy legislation to ensure uniform coverage.Google Scholar

Notably, the legislation and guidelines do not provide protection from breach of the common law duty of confidentiality. However, by indicating that disclosure should, where possible, be made without identifying the patient (see Guideline 7), the guidelines seek to minimise the risk of a breach of confidentiality.Google Scholar

See National Health and Medical Research Council, Guidelines Approved under Section 95AA of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), available at <https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/pr3> (last visited October 21, 2015).+(last+visited+October+21,+2015).>Google Scholar

Rogers, A. Durand de Bousingen, D., Bioethics in Europe (Council of Europe Press 1995): At 64–67 citing Professor Alain Pompidou Souviens-toi de l'Homme Paris, 1990.Google Scholar

This has been a central focus for the Tasmania Biobank planning, McWhirter, R. et al. , “Community Engagement for Big Epidemiology: Deliberative Democracy as a Tool,” Journal of Personalized Medicine 4, no. 4 (2014): 459–474. See also Chalmers, D. Nicol, D., “Commercialisation of Biotechnology: Public Trust and Research,” International Journal of Biotechnology 6, no. 2/3 (2004): 116–133.Google Scholar

Australian Law Reform Commission, Essentially Yours report 96, 2003 at para 5.2.Google Scholar

In Australia and New Zealand, the voluntary, not-for-profit Australasian Biospecimen Network is developing standardization advice. See the website at <http://www.abrn.net/> (last visited October 21, 2015).+(last+visited+October+21,+2015).>Google Scholar

Australasian Biospecimen Network Biorepository Protocols, 2012, available at <http://abrn.net/what-we-do/protocols/> (last visited October 21, 2015).+(last+visited+October+21,+2015).>Google Scholar

Beyleveld, D., “Data Protection and Genetics: Medical Research and the Public Good,” King's Law Journal 18, no. 2 (2007): 275–289; Campbell, A. V., “The Ethical Challenges of Genetic Databases: Safeguarding Altruism and Trust,” King's Law Journal 18, no. 2 (2007): 227–245; Brownsword, R., “Genetic Databases: One for All and All for One?” King's Law Journal 18, no. 2 (2007): 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See, for example, GA4GH, “Framework for Responsible Sharing of Genomic and Health-Related Data,” available at <http://genomicsandhealth.org/about-the-global-alliance/key-documents/framework-responsible-sharing-genomic-and-health-related-data> (last visited October 21, 2015).+(last+visited+October+21,+2015).>Google Scholar