Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Blake, Valarie K.
McGowan, Michelle L.
and
Levine, Aaron D.
2015.
Conflicts of Interest and Effective Oversight of Assisted Reproduction Using Donated Oocytes.
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 2,
p.
410.
Dickens, Bernard M.
and
Cook, Rebecca J.
2015.
Types of consent in reproductive health care.
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics,
Vol. 128,
Issue. 2,
p.
181.
Klitzman, Robert
2016.
Buying and selling human eggs: infertility providers’ ethical and other concerns regarding egg donor agencies.
BMC Medical Ethics,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 1,
Fauser, Bart CJM
and
Garcia Velasco, Juan
2017.
Breast cancer risk after oocyte donation: should we really be concerned?.
Reproductive BioMedicine Online,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 5,
p.
439.
Levine, Aaron D.
Boulet, Sheree L.
Berry, Roberta M.
Jamieson, Denise J.
Alberta-Sherer, Hillary B.
and
Kissin, Dmitry M.
2017.
Assessing the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States by non–United States residents.
Fertility and Sterility,
Vol. 108,
Issue. 5,
p.
815.
von Tigerstrom, Barbara
2017.
Regulating the Advertising and Promotion of Stem Cell Therapies.
Regenerative Medicine,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 7,
p.
815.
Kool, E M
Bos, A M E
van der Graaf, R
Fauser, B C J M
and
Bredenoord, A L
2018.
Ethics of oocyte banking for third-party assisted reproduction: a systematic review.
Human Reproduction Update,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 5,
p.
615.
Olesen, Angelina Patrick
Amin, Latifah
and
Mahadi, Zurina
2018.
Researchers experience of misconduct in research in Malaysian higher education institutions.
Accountability in Research,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 3,
p.
125.
Hartman, Anna E.
and
Coslor, Erica
2019.
Earning while giving: Rhetorical strategies for navigating multiple institutional logics in reproductive commodification.
Journal of Business Research,
Vol. 105,
Issue. ,
p.
405.
Tober, Diane
Garibaldi, Christina
Blair, Alden
and
Baltzell, Kimberly
2021.
Alignment between expectations and experiences of egg donors: what does it mean to be informed?.
Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online,
Vol. 12,
Issue. ,
p.
1.
Mikkelsen, Christina
Mori, Gaia
van Walraven, Suzanna M.
Castrén, Johanna
Zahra, Sharon
MacLennan, Sheila
Seidel, Kirsten
Fontana, Stefano
Veropalumbo, Eva
Cannata, Livia
Pupella, Simonetta
Kvist, Maria
Happel, Marjan
Korkalainen, Piia
Wulff, Birgit
Fernandez‐Sojo, Jesus
Eguizabal, Cristina
Urbano, Fernando
Vesga, Miguel Angel
Pozenel, Primoz
van Kraaij, Marian
Hansen, Morten Bagge
Slot, Ed
and
Ullum, Henrik
2021.
Putting the spotlight on donation‐related risks and donor safety – are we succeeding in protecting donors?.
Vox Sanguinis,
Vol. 116,
Issue. 3,
p.
313.
Molas, Anna
and
Whittaker, Andrea
2022.
Beyond the making of altruism: branding and identity in egg donation websites in Spain.
BioSocieties,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 2,
p.
320.
Banker, Manish
Arora, Parul
Banker, Jwal
Gupta, Reena
and
Shah, Sandeep
2022.
Follicular phase cycle programming using estradiol in oocyte donors–a convenient and effective approach.
F&S Reports,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 1,
p.
20.
Jacxsens, L.
Coveney, C.
Culley, L.
Lafuente-Funes, S.
Pennings, G.
Hudson, N.
and
Provoost, V.
2024.
The representation of medical risks and incentives concerning egg donation: an analysis of the websites of fertility clinics of Belgium, Spain and the UK.
Human Fertility,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 1,
Hammond, Kathleen
2024.
The plurality of norms that factor into Canadians’ decisions to engage in transnational egg transactions.
Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis,
p.
1.