Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T10:11:45.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variation in paediatric tonsillectomy rates between Scottish health board areas, 2001–2018: is socio-economic deprivation to blame?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2022

H Kubba*
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
L S Downie
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Scottish Public Health Observatory, Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Mr Kubba, Department of ENT, Royal Hospital for Children, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow G51 4TF, Scotland, UK E-mail: haytham.kubba@glasgow.ac.uk

Abstract

Background

Tonsillectomy is one of the commonest operations in children. Routinely collected national data were used to assess variations in the paediatric tonsillectomy rate across Scotland, and to determine if socio-economic deprivation is the cause.

Method

The Scottish Morbidity Records were reviewed for all children (0–16 years) undergoing tonsillectomy from 2001 to 2018.

Results

The mean annual tonsillectomy rate was 2.64 per 1000 children. Rates in each health board area varied from 1.24 to 3.9 per 1000. Half of this variation resulted from transfers between regions. There was a 1.75-fold difference between tonsillectomy rates in the most and least deprived population quintiles, but this did not account for the geographical variation.

Conclusion

Half the variance in paediatric tonsillectomy rates is associated with children being transferred between regions for treatment. After accounting for this, there is a 1.5-fold difference in rate between health board areas, which is not related to socio-economic deprivation and is currently unexplained.

Type
Main Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Mr H Kubba takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Paradise, JL, Bluestone, CD, Bachman, RZ, Colborn, DK, Bernard, BS, Taylor, FH et al. Efficacy of tonsillectomy for recurrent throat infection in severely affected children. N Engl J Med 1984;310:674–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paradise, JL, Bluestone, CD, Colborn, DK, Bernard, BS, Rockette, HE, Kurs-Lasky, M. Tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy for recurrent throat infection in moderately affected children. Pediatrics 2002;110(1 Pt 1):715CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Staaij, BK, Akker, EH, Rovers, MM, Hordijk, GJ, Hoes, AW, Schilder, AGM. Effectiveness of adenotonsillectomy in children with mild symptoms of throat infections or adenotonsillar hypertrophy: open, randomised trial. BMJ 2004;329:651CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lock, C, Wilson, J, Steen, N, Eccles, M, Mason, H, Carrie, S et al. North of England and Scotland Study of Tonsillectomy and Adeno-tonsillectomy in Children (NESSTAC): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial with a parallel non-randomised preference study. Health Technol Assess 2010;14:1164, iii–ivGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. SIGN 117. Management of Sore Throat and Indications for Tonsillectomy: A National Clinical Guideline. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, 2010Google Scholar
Boss, EF, Marsteller, JA, Simon, AE. Outpatient tonsillectomy in children: demographic and geographic variation in the United States, 2006. J Pediatr 2012;160:814–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Close, GR, Rushworth, RL, Rob, MI, Rubin, GL. Variation in selected childhood surgical procedures: the case of tonsillectomy and management of middle ear disease. J Paediatr Child Health 1993;29:429–33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Croxford, R, Friedberg, J, Coyte, PC. Socio-economic status and surgery in children: myringotomies and tonsillectomies in Ontario, Canada, 1996–2000. Acta Paediatr 2004;93:1245–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suleman, M, Clark, MPA, Goldacre, M, Burton, M. Exploring the variation in paediatric tonsillectomy rates between English regions: a 5-year NHS and independent sector data analysis. Clin Otolaryngol 2010;35:111–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koshy, E, Bottle, A, Murray, J, Sharland, M, Saxena, S. Changing indications and socio-demographic determinants of (adeno)tonsillectomy among children in England – are they linked? A retrospective analysis of hospital data. PLoS One 2014;9:e103600CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bisset, AF, Russell, D. Grommets, tonsillectomies, and deprivation in Scotland. BMJ 1994;308:1129CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clement, WA. Day-case tonsillectomy for children in Glasgow: the impact of changing indications and deprivation. J Laryngol Otol 2013;127:392–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kubba, H, Downie, LS. Trends in tonsillectomy surgery in children in Scotland 2000-2018. Clin Otolaryngol 2021;46:146–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Public Health Scotland. Data Support and Monitoring: SMR Completeness. In: https://www.isdscotland.org/products-and-Services/Data-Support-and-Monitoring/SMR-Completeness/ [24 November 2020]Google Scholar
ICD-10 Version:2010. In: https://icd.who.int/browse10/2010/en [24 November 2020]Google Scholar
Steel, D, Cylus, J. United Kingdom (Scotland): health system review. Health Syst Transit 2012;14:xvxxii, 1–150Google ScholarPubMed