Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:53:06.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Temporary obturator using high-density polyurethane foam following maxillectomy during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2022

G Aparna
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
A Alexander*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
G Sivaraman
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
R Kalaiarasi
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
*
Author for correspondence: Prof Arun Alexander, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India E-mail: arunalexandercmc@gmail.com

Abstract

Background

Rhino-orbital mucormycosis was seen in epidemic proportions during the second wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Many of these post-coronavirus rhino-orbital mucormycosis patients underwent maxillectomy for disease clearance. Rehabilitating such a large number of patients with surgical obturators as an emergency in a low-income setting was challenging.

Methods

High-density polyurethane foam was used to make a temporary obturator for patients who underwent maxillectomy. These obturators helped alleviate functional problems like dysphagia and nasal regurgitation, improving nutritional outcomes and shortening the hospital stay.

Conclusion

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic gave physicians time-sensitive challenges, for which immediate alternatives to established care were required. A maxillary obturator made of high-density polyurethane foam is an innovative solution to rehabilitate maxillectomy patients in the immediate post-operative period.

Type
Short Communications
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Prof A Alexander takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Pruthi, G, Parkash, H, Vijaya Bharathi, P, Jain, R, Gupta, A, Rai, S. Comprehensive review of guidelines to practice prosthodontic and implant procedures during COVID-19 pandemic. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2020;10:768–75CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohamed, K, Mahesheswaran, R FB, Mohanty, S. Delayed surgical obturator—case series. Indian J Surg Oncol 2020;11:154–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inbarajan, A, Natarajan, S, Thangarajan, ST, Seenivasan, M, Banu, F, Kumar, VA. Impact of prosthodontic treatment on the oral health-related quality of life in mucormycosis patient: a case report. Cureus 2018;10:e3493Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, C. Lyofoam. Br J Nurs 1996;5:757–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanaka, Y, Gold, HO, Pruzansky, S. A simplified technique for fabricating a lightweight obturator. J Prosthet Dent 1977;38:638–42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed