Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:04:36.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of amiloride on the endolymphatic sac

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

M. Takumida*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Karolinska Hospital, Karolinska Institute S-104 01 Stockholm, Sweden.
D. Bagger-Sjöbäck
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Karolinska Hospital, Karolinska Institute S-104 01 Stockholm, Sweden.
*
M. Takumida, M.D., Department of Otolaryngology, Hiroshima University School of Medicine, 1-2-3 Kasumicho, Minamiku, Hiroshima 734, Japan.

Abstract

The effect of amiloride on the murine endolymphatic sac was investigated. The amiloride caused collapse of the lateral intercellular spaces in the endolymphatic sac epithelium and a subsequent mild endolymphatic hydrops. These changes indicated a decreased absorption of endolymph in the endolymphatic sac. Amiloride is known to inhibit the transcellular fluid transport without inducing any changes in the paracellular fluid transport. It is therefore suggested that amiloride specially inhibits the fluid and ion exchange in the apical portion of the epithelial cells resulting a decrease in transcellular fluid transport across the endolymphatic sac epithelium. The transcellular fluid transport seems to be one of the main mechanisms in the endolymphatic sac fluid exchange system.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amano, H., Orsulakowa, A. and Morgenstern, C. (1983) Intracellular and extracellular ion content of the endolymphatic sac. Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 237: 273277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bagger-Sjöbäck, D., Rask-Andersen, H. and Lundquist, P. G. (1981) Intercellular junctions in the epithelium of the endolymphatic sac: A freeze fracture and TEM study on the guinea pig's labyrinth. In Vosteen, K-H et al. (eds.): Ménière's Disease. Stuttgart, Georg Thieme Verlag, pp. 99109.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. M. (1979) Osmotic water flow in leaky epithelia. Journal of Membrane Biology, 51: 195216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frederiksen, O. (1983) Effect of amiloride on sodium and water reabsorption in the rabbit gall-bladder. Journal of Physiology. 335: 7588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frizzell, R. A., Field, M. and Schultz, S. G. (1979) Sodium-coupled chloride transport by epithelial tissues. American Journal of Physiology, 236: F1–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Kimura, R. S. and Schuknecht, H. F. (1965) Membranous hydrops in the inner ear of the guinea pig after obliteration of the endolymphatic sac. Practica Oto-rhino-laryngologica, 27: 343354.Google Scholar
Lundquist, P. G. (1965) The endolymphatic duct and sac in the guinea pig: An electron microscopic and experimental investigation. Acta Otolaryngologica Supplement, 201: 1108.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, C, Miyamoto, H., Arnold, W. and Vosteen, K. H. (1982) Functional and morphological findings of endolymphatic sac. Acta Otolaryngologica 93: 187194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mori, N., Ninoyu, O. and Morgenstern, C. (1987) Cation transport in the ampulla of the semicircular canal and in the endolymphatic sac. Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 244: 6165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rask-Andersen, H., Bredberg, G., Lyttkens, L. and Lööf, G. (1981) The function of the endolymphatic duct. An experimental study using ionic lanthanum as a tracer. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 374: 1119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takumida, M., Bagger-Sjöbäck, D. and Rask-Andersen, H. (1988) Ruthenium red staining of the endolymphatic sac in the guinea pig. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 102: 760765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tormey, J. Mc.D. and Diamond, J. M. (1969) The ultrastructural route of fluid transport in rabbit gall bladder. Journal of General Physiology, 50: 20312060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar