Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Characterising and quantifying outcomes in rhinology out-patients: measurements in the ‘real world’

  • J C L Yeo (a1), O J Hilmi (a1) and G W McGarry (a1)

Abstract

Aims:

We aimed to evaluate a practical, computerised database for collection of patient-reported and clinical outcome data, introduced as a means of characterising our patient population and assessing the effect of our interventions.

Methods:

A prospectively updated, computerised database was used to detail each patient's coded and structured diagnosis and clinical findings. Response to treatment was recorded using the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 and changes in graded clinical examination findings.

Results:

Data for 770 patients were prospectively entered into the database. Patients were grouped diagnostically as follows: rhinitis (20.4 per cent), chronic rhinosinusitis (12.2 per cent), chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps (24.7 per cent), anatomical anomaly (22.7 per cent), epistaxis (3.4 per cent) and ‘other’ (18.4 per cent). Following initial medical intervention, the greatest improvement in the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 score was seen in the chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps group (−11.3), followed by the rhinitis group (−6.1) and the chronic rhinosinusitis group (−5.4).

Conclusions:

The tested rhinology database provides a simple, effective and practical tool for integrating the recording of clinical and patient-reported outcome measures during the out-patient visit. It enables characterisation of the patient population, and accurately monitors and records treatment responses.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Characterising and quantifying outcomes in rhinology out-patients: measurements in the ‘real world’
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Characterising and quantifying outcomes in rhinology out-patients: measurements in the ‘real world’
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Characterising and quantifying outcomes in rhinology out-patients: measurements in the ‘real world’
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Mr J C L Yeo, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow G4 0SF, Scotland, UK. E-mail: j_yeo@doctors.org.uk

References

Hide All
1 Hopkins, C. Patient reported outcome measures in rhinology. Rhinology 2009;47:1017
2 Benninger, MS, Ferguson, BJ, Hadley, JA, Hamilos, DL, Jacobs, M, Kennedy, DW et al. Adult chronic rhinosinusitis: definitions, diagnosis, epidemiology, and pathophysiology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129(Suppl 3):S132
3 Morley, AD, Sharp, HR. A review of sinonasal outcome scoring systems – which is best? Clin Otolaryngol 2006;31:103–9
4 Hopkins, C, Browne, J, Slack, R, Lund, VJ, Topham, J, Reeves, B et al. The national comparative audit of surgery for nasal polyposis and rhinosinusitis. Clin Otolaryngol 2006;31:390–8
5 Hopkins, C, Gillett, S, Slack, R, Lund, VJ, Browne, JP. Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test. Clin Otolaryngol 2009;34:447–54
6 Gillett, S, Hopkins, C, Slack, R, Browne, JP. A pilot study of the SNOT 22 scores in adults with no sinonasal disease. Clin Otolaryngol 2009;34:467–9
7 Holmstrom, M, Scadding, GK, Lund, VJ, Darby, YC. Assessment of nasal obstruction. A comparison between rhinomanometry and nasal inspiratory peak flow. Rhinology 1990;28:191–6
8 Lund, V, MacKay, I. Staging in rhinosinusitis. Rhinology 1993;31:183–4
9 Patel, RS, Wallace, AM, Hinnie, J, McGarry, GW. Preliminary results of a pilot study investigating the potential of salivary cortisol measurements to detect occult adrenal suppression secondary to steroid nose drops. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2001;26:231–4
10 Electronic Basic Rhinology Database Guidance Notes. In: http://www.entuk.org/audits/guidance_notes [20 January 2010]
11 Rhinology Minimum Electronic Dataset. In: http://www.rhinodataset.co.uk/ [20 January 2010]
12 Larsen, K. The clinical relationship of nasal polyps to asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc l996;17:243–9
13 Seybt, MW, McMains, KC, Kountakis, SE. The prevalence and effect of asthma on adults with chronic rhinosinusitis. Ear Nose Throat J 2007;86:409–11

Keywords

Characterising and quantifying outcomes in rhinology out-patients: measurements in the ‘real world’

  • J C L Yeo (a1), O J Hilmi (a1) and G W McGarry (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed