Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:38:56.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cartilage tympanoplasty: how to reduce surgery time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2010

E De Seta ,
E Covelli ,
D De Seta ,
P Mancini  and
R Filipo
E De Seta*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Neurology & Otolaryngology, ‘La Sapienza’ University of Rome, Italy
E Covelli
Affiliation:
Dept. of Neurology & Otolaryngology, ‘La Sapienza’ University of Rome, Italy
D De Seta
Affiliation:
Dept. of Neurology & Otolaryngology, ‘La Sapienza’ University of Rome, Italy
P Mancini
Affiliation:
Dept. of Neurology & Otolaryngology, ‘La Sapienza’ University of Rome, Italy
R Filipo
Affiliation:
Dept. of Neurology & Otolaryngology, ‘La Sapienza’ University of Rome, Italy
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Elio De Seta, University ‘La Sapienza’ Rome, Piazzale A. Moro, 5 00185 Rome, Italy. Fax: +39 06 4454864 E-mail: edeseta@yahoo.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the last few years, cartilage has been the preferred material for reconstruction of the tympanic membrane, particularly in the case of allergy, re-perforation, or total or subtotal perforation. The mechanical characteristics of cartilage offer the advantage of high resistance to retraction and re-perforation. This paper describes two original techniques which reduce cartilage tympanoplasty surgery time, involving a 0.3 mm thick cartilage–perichondrium composite graft to repair the tympanic membrane.

Keywords

TympanoplastyMyringoplastyOtologic Surgical ProceduresCartilage
Type
Short Communications
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 124 , Issue 7 , July 2010 , pp. 784 - 785
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Utech, H. Tympanotomy in disorders of sound conduction; its diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities [in German]. Ztschr Laryng Rhinol Otol 1959;38:212–21Google ScholarPubMed
2Salen, B. Myringoplasty using septum cartilage. Acta Otolaryngol 1963;188(suppl 188):82–93Google Scholar
3Goodhill, V. Tragal perichondrium and cartilage in tympanoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol 1967;85:36–47CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Anderson, J, Cavè-Thomasen, P, Tos, M. A comparison of cartilage palisades and fascia in tympanoplasty after surgery for sinus or tensa retraction cholesteatoma in children. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:856–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Kazikdas, KC, Onal, K, Boyraz, I, Karabulut, E. Palisade cartilage tympanoplasty for management of subtotal perforations: a comparison with the temporalis fascia technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007;264:985–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Tos, M. Cartilage tympanoplasty methods: proposal of a classification. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;139:747–58CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Murbe, D, Zahnert, T, Bornitz, M, Huttenbrink, KB. Acoustic properties of different cartilage reconstruction techniques of the tympanic membrane. Laryngoscope 2002;112:1769–76CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed