Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T09:18:56.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pressure injection demonstrates points of weakness in the posterior nasal arteries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2010

T W Chiu  and
J Shaw Dunn
T W Chiu*
Affiliation:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China
J Shaw Dunn
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Human Anatomy, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr Tor Wo Chiu, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, China. Fax: 852 26377974 E-mail: torchiu@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To test the hypothesis that potential sites of weakness within normal nasal arteries, when stressed, contribute to the mechanism of epistaxis, we ‘stress-tested’ nasal arteries in unfixed cadaveric heads, using pressure injection of feeding arteries.

Materials and methods:

Indian ink with latex was injected into maxillary arteries under high pressure (620 mmHg). Stepwise dissection was carried out and areas showing ink leakage were examined. Control heads were injected at standard embalming pressures (375 mmHg).

Results:

Ink leakage was found in all heads injected at higher pressure, and was restricted to the nasal mucosa. Histological examination of leakage points demonstrated vessel disruption consistent with dissecting aneurysm formation.

Discussion:

Results showed that high pressure injection caused leakage from arteries in the posterior nose; the distribution of leakage points was consistent with many clinical investigations. The lesions produced were comparable with our best histopathological model of epistaxis, i.e. dissecting aneurysm formation. This suggests that pre-existing weaknesses in the arterial configuration may exist.

Keywords

EpistaxisNasal CavityArteryAnatomy
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 124 , Issue 7 , July 2010 , pp. 750 - 752
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Browning, GG. Updated ENT, 3rd edn.Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1994Google Scholar
2Burton, M. Hall and Colman's Diseases of the Ear, Nose and Throat, 15th edn.Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2000Google Scholar
3Shaheen, OH. Arterial epistaxis. J Laryngol Otol 1975;89:17–34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Padgham, ND, Parham, DM. Haemorrhagic nasal nodules. Clin Otolaryngol 1993;18:118–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Christensen, NP, Smith, DS, Barnwell, SL, Wax, MK. Arterial embolization in the management of posterior epistaxis. Otol Head Neck Surg 2005;133:748–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6ATSM D1598 Standard Method for Test for Time-to-Failure of Plastic Pipe under Long-Term Hydrostatic Pressure. Philadephia: ATSM 2009Google Scholar
7Tucker, WN. The investigation and treatment of epistaxis: a report of one hundred and sixty-four cases. N Z Med J 1963;62:283–7Google ScholarPubMed
8McGarry, GW. Nasal endoscope in posterior epistaxis: a preliminary evaluation. J Laryngol Otol 1991;105:428–431CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9El-Simily, O. Endonasal endoscopy and posterior epistaxis. Rhinology 1993;31:119–20Google Scholar
10Chiu, TW, McGarry, GW. Prospective clinical study of bleeding sites in idiopathic adult posterior epistaxis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;137:390–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed