Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T10:19:12.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politicization of the Brazilian Catholic Church: The Catholic Electoral League

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Margaret Todaro Williams
Margaret Todaro Williams*
Affiliation:
Department of History, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90007
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the most curious phenomena ever to be recorded in the annals of Latin American church history was a peculiarly Brazilian institution known as the Catholic Electoral League. Lofty in its ideals but confused in their practice, disclaiming political party status yet directly involving the Church in every political campaign of the day, the League functioned between 1932 and 1937 as a political pressure group under the direct auspices of the Roman Catholic Church. It operated on a more national scale than the political parties themselves, which were still basically regional.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , August 1974 , pp. 301 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amoroso Lima, A. (1958a) “Notas para a história do Centro Dom Vital-VIH.” A Ordem (June): 50-58.Google Scholar
Amoroso Lima, A. (1958b) “Notas para a história do Centro Dom Vital-IX.” A Ordem (July): 62-68.Google Scholar
Amoroso Lima, A. (1958c) “Notas para a história do Centro Dom Vital-X.” A Ordem (August): 60-69.Google Scholar
Amoroso Lima, A. (1934a) “O espirito do nosso voto.” A Ordem (October): 231-238.Google Scholar
Amoroso Lima, A. (1934b) “O sentido da nossa victoria.” A Ordem (June): 417-432.Google Scholar
Amoroso Lima, A. (1934c) To the Secretary-Generals of the Juntas Estaduaes of LEC, June 7. (hereinafter cited as Sumaré)Google Scholar
Amoroso Lima, A. (1933) To Archbishop Dom João Becker, Porto Alegre, March 23. Private collection of Cardinal Dom Jayme de Barros Câmara. (Sumaré)Google Scholar
Annais da Assembléia Constituinte (1934) Rio de Janeiro: Imprensa Nacional.Google Scholar
Aragao, C. B. (1933) To Archbishop Dom João Becker, Porto Alegre, June 3. (Sumaré)Google Scholar
“Actas das sessoes da Confederacao Cathólica do Rio de Janeiro” (1923) In Catholic Confederation headquarters in Rio de Janeiro, February 4.Google Scholar
“Ata da sessao plenária da Confederaçao Cathólica” (1932) In Catholic Confederation headquarters in Rio de Janeiro, October 31.Google Scholar
Becker, J. (1933) To Conego Benjamin Aragáo, June 20.Google Scholar
Cardoso, M. (1933) Comissao Central do Partido Republicano Riograndense to Junta Estadual da Liga Eleitoral Cathólica, April 24. (Sumaré)Google Scholar
Cardoso, M. (1932) Comissão Mixta da Frente Única Riograndense to Amaya de Gusmão, Porto Alegre, December 2. (Sumaré)Google Scholar
Correa de Oliveria, P. (1933a) To the Juntas Regionais de São Paulo, April 24. Circular letter. (Sumaré)Google Scholar
Correa de Oliveria, P. (1933b) Alceu Amoroso Lima, April 29. (Sumaré)Google Scholar
Correio do Povo (1933) “Manifesto da Liga Eleitoral Cathólica da Diocese de Santa Maria.” (April 28): 2. (Porto Alegre)Google Scholar
“Dispositivos que a consciencia católica rejeita por colidirem com os que apoia” (1933) November. Confidential mimeograph. (Sumaré)Google Scholar
“Estatutos da Liga Eleitoral Cathólica” (1932) Original draft. (Sumaré)Google Scholar
Estrella do Sul (1933) “Declaração da LEC.” (April 26): 1. (Porto Alegre)Google Scholar
Fernandes, C. (1948) “A religião nas Constituições Republicanas no Brasil.” Revista Eclesiástica Brasileira 8 (December): 830–858.Google Scholar
Fiori, H., Pires, N., and da Rocha, E. J. (1933) Junta Estadual da Liga Eleitoral Cathólica de Rio Grande do Sul to Dom João Becker, April 29. (Sumaré)Google Scholar
Furtado, A. (1933) “Bases jurídicas das reivindicações católicas.” (confidential LEC pamphlet, Sumaré)Google Scholar
Furtado, A. (1932) To Sr. Dr. Joaquim Mauricio Cardoso, Presidente da Comissao Mixta da Frente Única Riograndense, Porto Alegre, November 17. (Sumaré)Google Scholar
Gusmao, A. de (1933) To Alceu Amoroso Lima, June, report. (Sumaré)Google Scholar
Leme, S. (1938) A carta pastoral de S. Em. Sr. Dom Leme, quando arcebispo de Olinda saudando os seus diocesanos. Petróplis: Ed. Vozes.Google Scholar
Macedo so Ares, J. C. de (1933a) Confidential letter to Alceu Amoroso Lima, March 18. (Sumaré)Google Scholar
Macedo so Ares, J. C. de (1933b) Confidential Letter to Alceu Amoroso Lima, March 26. (Sumaré)Google Scholar
Maria Regina do Santo Rosario, I. (1962) O cardeal Leme. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. José OlympicGoogle Scholar
Mello, O. de (1959) “O cardeal Leme e a LEC,” Jornal do Brasil (September 6): 2.Google Scholar
Pattee, R. (1951) El Catolicismo en Hispanoamérica. Buenos Aires: Ed. Fides.Google Scholar
“Plano para a execução da Liga Eleitoral Cathólica” (1932) Confidential memo. (Sumaré)Google Scholar
“Recommendações da Junta Nacional da LEC às Juntas Estaduaes de todo o Brasil” (1933) Confidential recommendations. (Sumaré)Google Scholar
“Recommendações da Junta Nacional da LEC às Juntas Estaduaes de todo o Brasil” (1932) Confidential recommendations. (Sumaré)Google Scholar
“Reivindicaçõses Políticas” (1931) April 15. (Sumaré)Google Scholar
Salgado, P., Paranhas, U., and Castro Rodrigues, J. B. de (1933) To Sebastião Cardeal Leme, February 18. (Sumaré)Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. (1971) Interest Conflict and Political Change in Brazil. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Semana Religiosa (1934) “A Victõria da LEC.” (June 2). (Porto Alegre)Google Scholar
Vianna, J. M. (1933) Juíz de Fora to Sebastião Cardeal Leme, February 18. (Sumaré)Google Scholar
Whitaker, A. (1964) “Nationalism and religion in Argentina and Uruguay,” pp. 73–90 in W. D'Antonio and F. Pike (eds.) Religion, Revolution, and Reform. New York: Frederick A. Praeger.Google Scholar