Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T09:24:43.266Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the primacy of economic property rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2022

Douglas W. Allen*
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
*
Corresponding author. Email: allen@sfu.ca

Abstract

Bart Wilson suggests that economists interested in property rights have it all backwards when they define ownership as a bundle of rights. Rather he argues that ownership comes first in the form of an abstract concept. I claim there is a small element of truth to this, but the bulk of what he argues is already understood through the concept of economic property rights. Wilson's consternation is mostly the result of a failure to appreciate this latter concept.

Type
Comment
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Millennium Economics Ltd.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Thanks to Geoffrey Hodgson for requesting this comment.

References

Allen, D. (2015), ‘On Hodgson on Property Rights’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(4): 711717, doi: 10.1017/S1744137415000132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, D. (2017), ‘Property as Sequential Exchange: Definition and Language Issues’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 13(4): 785792, doi: 10.1017/S1744137417000091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barzel, Y. (2015), ‘What are ‘Property Rights’, and Why Do They Matter? A Comment on Hodgson's Article’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(4): 719723, doi: 10.1017/S1744137415000181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barzel, Y. and Allen, D. W. (forthcoming), Economic Analysis of Property Rights (3rd edn), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, D. (2015), ‘‘Economic Property Rights’ as ‘Nonsense upon Stilts’: A Comment on Hodgson’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(4): 725730, doi: 10.1017/S174413741500020XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F A (1978), ‘The Primacy of the Abstract’, New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics, and the History of Ideas, London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 3556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. (2015), ‘Much of the ‘Economics of Property Rights’ Devalues Property and Legal Rights’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(4): 683709, doi: 10.1017/S1744137414000630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holcombe, R. (2014), ‘The Economic Theory of Rights’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 10(3): 471491, doi: 10.1017/S1744137414000137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B. (2022), ‘The Primacy of Property; or, the Subordination of Property Rights’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 18: 117, doi: 10.1017/S1744137422000212.Google Scholar