Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Editorial introduction to ‘Collectivist planning’ by Michael Polanyi (1940)

  • Geoffrey M. Hodgson (a1) and Michael Polanyi (a1)

Abstract

After an esteemed academic career as a chemist, Michael Polanyi switched to the social sciences and made significant contributions to our understanding of the nature and role of knowledge in society. Polanyi's argument concerning knowledge led him to emphasise the vital importance of decentralised mechanisms of adjustment and coordination, including markets. His article ‘Collectivist Planning’ (1940) enters into debates about the possibility (or otherwise) of centrally planning scientific and economic activity. This early article also foreshadows post-war debates within the Mont Pèlerin Socierty (formed in 1947) concerning the economic role of the state and the future of liberalism.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email: g.hodgson2@lboro.ac.uk

References

Hide All
Allen, R. T. (1998), Beyond Liberalism: The Political Thought of F. A. Hayek and Michael Polanyi, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Bladel, J. P. (2005), ‘Against Polanyi-Centrism: Hayek and the Re-emergence of “Spontaneous Order”’, Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 8(4): 1530.
Block, F. and Somers, M. (2014), The Power of Market Fundamentalism: Karl Polanyi's Critique, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burgin, A. (2012), The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free Markets since the Depression, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dale, G. (2010), Karl Polanyi: The Limits to the Market, Cambridge: Polity Press.
D'Amico, D. J. (2015), ‘Spontaneous Order’, in Boettke, Peter J. and Coyne, Christopher (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Austrian Economics, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 115142.
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993), ‘Coevolution of Neocortical Size, Group Size, and Language’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(4): 681694.
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2010), How many Friends does One Person Need? Dunbar's Number and other Evolutionary Quirks, London: Faber & Faber.
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011), ‘Constraints on the Evolution of Social Institutions and their Implications for Information Flow’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(3): 345371.
Gulick, L. and Urwick, L. (eds) (1937), Papers on the Science of Administration, New York: Columbia University.
Hayek, F. A. (1944), The Road to Serfdom, London: George Routledge.
Hodgson, G. M. (2007), ‘The Impossibility of Social Democracy by Albert E. F. Schäffle’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 3(1): 113125.
Hodgson, G. M. (2015), Conceptualizing Capitalism: Institutions, Evolution, Future, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hodgson, G. M. (2017), ‘Karl Polanyi on Economy and Society: A Critical Analysis of Core Concepts’, Review of Social Economy, 75(1): 125.
Hodgson, G. M. (2019a), ‘How Mythical Markets Mislead Analysis: An Institutionalist Critique of Market Universalism’, Socio-Economic Review, published online.
Hodgson, G. M. (2019b), Is Socialism Feasible? Towards an Alternative Future, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Hodgson, G. M. (2019c), Is There a Future for Heterodox Economics? Institutions, Ideology and a Scientific Community, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Jacobs, S. (2000), ‘Spontaneous Order: Michael Polanyi and Friedrich Hayek’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 3(4): 4967.
Jacobs, S. and Mullins, P. (2016), ‘Friedrich Hayek and Michael Polanyi in Correspondence’, History of European Ideas, 42(1): 107–30.
Jaques, E. (1988), Requisite Organisation, A Total System for Effective Managerial Organization and Managerial Leadership for the 21st Century, Gloucester, MA: Cason Hall.
Kitcher, P. (1993), The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lavoie, D. (1985), Rivalry and Central Planning: The Socialist Calculation Debate Reconsidered, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mackenzie, K. D. (1978), Organizational Structures, Northbrook, IL: AHM Publishing.
Mirowski, P. (1998), ‘Economics, Science and Knowledge: Polanyi vs. Hayek’, Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical, 25(1): 2942.
Mirowski, P. and Plehwe, D. (eds) (2009), The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nye, M. J. (2011), Michael Polanyi and His Generation: Origins of the Social Construction of Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Oğuz, F. (2010), ‘Hayek on Tacit Knowledge’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 6(2), June: 145165.
Polanyi, M. (1940), The Contempt of Freedom: The Russian Experiment and After, London: Watts.
Polanyi, M. (1941), ‘The Growth of Thought in Society’, Economica (new series), 8(32): 428456.
Polanyi, K. (1944), The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, New York: Rinehart.
Polanyi, M. (1944), ‘Patent Reform’, Review of Economic Studies, 11(2): 6176.
Polanyi, M. (1945), Full Employment and Free Trade, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Polanyi, M. (1948), ‘Planning and Spontaneous Order’, The Manchester School, 16: 237268. Reprinted in Polanyi (1951).
Polanyi, M. (1951), The Logic of Liberty: Reflections and Rejoinders, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Polanyi, M. (1957), ‘The Foolishness of History: November 1917–November 1957’, Encounter, 9(5): 3337. Reprinted in Polanyi (1997).
Polanyi, M. (1958), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Polanyi, M. (1962a), ‘The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory’, Minerva, 1(1): 5473.
Polanyi, M. (1962b), ‘Tacit Knowing: Its Bearing on Some Problems of Philosophy’, Reviews of Modern Physics, 34(4): 601615.
Polanyi, M. (1967), The Tacit Dimension, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Polanyi, M. (1997), Society, Economics and Philosophy: Selected Papers, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Röpke, W. (1960), A Humane Economy: The Social Framework of the Free Market, Chicago: Henry Regnery.
Rosenblatt, H. (2018), The Lost History of Liberalism: From Ancient Rome to the Twenty-First Century, Princeton NJ and Oxford UK: Princeton University Press.
Schäffle, A. E. F. (1870), Kapitalismus und Sozialismus: mit besonderer Riicksicht auf Geschäfts und Vermögensformen, Tübingen: Laupp.
Schäffle, A. E. F. (1892), The Impossibility of Social Democracy: Being a Supplement to ‘The Quintessence of Socialism’, London: Swan Sonnenschein and New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
Schäffle, A. E. F. (1908), The Quintessence of Socialism, London: Swan Sonnenschein and New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
Simon, H. A. (1947), Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization, New York: Free Press.
Simon, H. A. (1957), Models of Man: Social and Rational. Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting, New York: Wiley.
Steele, D. R. (1992), From Marx to Mises: Post-Capitalist Society and the Challenge of Economic Calculation, La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Vatiero, M. (2010), The Ordoliberal notion of market power: an institutionalist reassessment’, European Competition Journal, 6(3): 689707.
Vaughn, K. I. (1980), ‘Economic Calculation under Socialism: The Austrian Contribution’, Economic Inquiry, 18(4): 535554.
Webb, S. J. and Webb, B. (1935), Soviet Communism: A New Civilisation? London: Longmans Green and Left Book Club.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Editorial introduction to ‘Collectivist planning’ by Michael Polanyi (1940)

  • Geoffrey M. Hodgson (a1) and Michael Polanyi (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.