Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T22:45:05.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on the viability of metacercariae of Fasciola gigantica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2024

A. Prasad*
Affiliation:
Division of Parasitology, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar 243 122, India
S. Ghosh
Affiliation:
Division of Parasitology, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar 243 122, India
P.K. Santra
Affiliation:
Division of Parasitology, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar 243 122, India
*
*Fax: 0091 581 457284

Abstract

The viability of metacercariae of Fasciola gigantica was tested by in vitro and in vivo methods. In vitro testing was based upon the motility of juvenile flukes within the inner cyst as examined under the light microscope. In vivo testing was undertaken through experimental infections of rabbits (two groups) and natural definitive hosts, lambs (one group). In the first group, out of six rabbits each given 25 metacercariae, worm establishment only took place in one rabbit with a single fluke recovery on 60 days post infection. In the second group of six rabbits each given 200 metacercariae, five were infected, with two or three flukes per host. All the lambs given 250 metacercariae became infected showing prevalences of 7.2–40% in comparison with rabbits in which low prevalences (0–4%) were recorded. The results indicated that even viable metacercariae which were already tested in vitro could not readily establish in rabbits. Such variability in worm establishment suggests that immunological and chemotherapeutic studies in rabbits infected with F. gigantica are likely to be unreliable.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coyle, T.J. (1959) Control of fascioliasis in Uganda. In IACED Symposium on Helminthiasis in Domestic Animals. Nairobi, July, 1959.Google Scholar
El-Bahy, M.M. (1997) Concerning “Comparative studies on the effect of bithionol, praziquantel and triclabendazole in rabbit's fascioliasis”. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology 27, 615616.Google Scholar
Graber, M. (1974) Fasciola gigantica in rabbits. Revue de Élevage et de Médecine Vétérinaire des Pays Tropicaux 27, 195201.Google Scholar
Guobadia, E.E. & Fagbemi, B.O. (1995) Time-course analysis of antibody response by EITB and ELISA before and after chemotherapy in sheep infected with Fasciola gigantica . Veterinary Parasitology 58, 247253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanna, R.E.B., Baalawy, S.S. & Jura, W. (1975) Methods of in vitro study of the invasive processes of Fasciola gigantica . Research in Veterinary Science 19, 9697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harlow, E. & Lane, D. (1988) Antibodies. A laboratory manual. 726 pp. New York, Cold spring Harbor Laboratory.Google Scholar
Khajuria, J.K. & Bali, H.S. (1987) Experimental Fasciola gigantica (Cobbold, 1855) infection in various animal species. Cheiron 16, 8185.Google Scholar
Kimura, S. & Shimizu, A. (1978) Viability of Fasciola gigantica metacercaria. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Science 40, 357359.Google Scholar
Malek, E.A. & Cheng, T.C. (1974) Medical and economic malacology. 361 pp. New York and London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mango, A.M., Mango, C.K.A. & Esamol, D. (1972) A preliminary note on the susceptibility, prepatency and recovery of Fasciola gigantica in small laboratory animals. Journal of Helminthology 46, 381386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poitou, I., Baeza, E. & Boulard, C. (1992) Humoral and cellular immune responses in rats during a primary infestation with Fasciola hepatica. Veterinary Parasitology 45, 5971.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prasad, A. (1989) Experimental infection of Lymnaea auricularia race rufescens for mass harvesting of metacercariae of Fasciola gigantica . Journal of Veterinary Parasitology 3, 3134.Google Scholar
Srivastava, P.S. & Singh, K.S. (1974) On the susceptibility of three species of laboratory animals for experimental infection with Fasciola gigantica Cobbold, 1955. Indian Journal of Animal Research 8, 1520.Google Scholar
Thapar, G.S. & Tandon, R.S. (1952) On the life history of liver fluke, Fasciola gigantica Cobbold, 1955 in India. Indian Journal of Helminthology 4, 136.Google Scholar
Yoshihara, S. & Goto, N. (1993) Distribution of antigens of Fasciola gigantica at various stages of development. Research in Veterinary Science 54, 252255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoshihara, S., Hazeyama, M., Kato, H. & Goto, N. (1995) Separation of outer cysts from metacercariae of Fasciola gigantica in an aqueous two-phase system. Journal of Helminthology 69, 8587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, G.L., Jen, L.W., Cerro, J.E., Fransworth, K.L. & Wescott, R.B. (1982) Diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in sheep by an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. American Journal of Veterinary Research 43, 20972100.Google ScholarPubMed